Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree Paramedic practice questions · Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology

10 free Paramedic practice questions: Advanced Diabetic and Endocrine Emergencies

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT Paramedic content specifications and kept inside the Paramedic scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free Paramedic diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A 47-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes is confused and combative. A family member says the patient was completely normal 20 minutes ago. The skin is pale, cool, and moist, and breathing is quiet and unlabored. The vital signs are BP 132/84, P 116, R 16, and SpO₂ 98% on room air. Neither glucometer on the truck will power on. Which action best fits this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Treat for hypoglycemia, since the onset was fast and the skin is moist

When you cannot get a number on an altered diabetic patient, you treat for the low. The reasoning is a comparison of harms. Giving sugar to a patient who is actually hyperglycemic nudges a problem that has been building for hours or days and changes very little. Withholding sugar from a patient who is actually hypoglycemic lets a fast problem cause permanent brain injury while you wait. The clinical picture points the same way here: minutes rather than hours, pale cool moist skin, and quiet breathing. Hyperglycemia arrives over hours to days with warm dry skin and a deep breathing pattern, and neither of those is in front of you.

Why the others are wrong

Treat as a postictal state and transport without glucose correction: A postictal patient can be confused and combative, and an unwitnessed seizure is always possible. A postictal state gradually clears, hypoglycemia is itself a cause of seizures, and skipping glucose correction is the one move that can turn a reversible problem into a permanent one.

Treat for hyperglycemia with fluid, since the skin findings fit either: Fluid is the right treatment for a hyperglycemic emergency and it is never harmful in small amounts, so this feels safe. The onset over 20 minutes and the pale cool moist skin are a hypoglycemic picture, and a hyperglycemic crisis does not develop while a family member watches.

Withhold sugar until a reading confirms which problem this is: Wanting a number before you treat is good discipline in almost every other situation, and it is why this answer reads as careful. Waiting is itself a decision here, and the cost of waiting through a real hypoglycemia is permanent injury while the cost of treating a high patient is close to nothing.

Question 2 of 10

A 35-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes is drowsy, will not follow commands, and cannot be kept awake long enough to swallow, though the gag reflex is intact. An intravenous line is already established. The vital signs are BP 126/78, P 110, R 16, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. The blood glucose level reads 31 mg/dL. Which route best fits this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Intravenous dextrose, since the line is in and swallowing is unsafe

The hypoglycemia ladder has three rungs and the patient decides which one you are on. Oral glucose is for a patient who can protect the airway and swallow on command. Dextrose is for a patient who cannot, when you have access. Glucagon is the fallback for when the patient cannot swallow and you do not have access. This patient cannot swallow safely, which takes the top rung away, but the line is already in, so you never reach the fallback. Dextrose is also the fastest of the three, working within a minute or two, while glucagon takes ten to twenty even when it works.

Why the others are wrong

Intramuscular glucagon, since the patient cannot swallow: Glucagon is a legitimate rung on this ladder and the reasoning about swallowing is correct as far as it goes. It is the answer only when access has not been obtained, and choosing it here trades a drug that works in minutes for one that takes ten to twenty.

Glucose gel under the tongue, since it is absorbed without swallowing: Buccal and sublingual absorption gets taught as a workaround, so this sounds like a clever middle path. Glucose gel is absorbed poorly through the mucosa and still ends up somewhere it can be aspirated, and none of that is necessary when a line is already in place.

Oral glucose gel, since the gag reflex is intact: An intact gag reflex is genuinely reassuring and makes oral glucose look available. Protecting the airway and being able to swallow on command are two different abilities, and a patient who cannot stay awake long enough to swallow cannot take anything by mouth safely.

Question 3 of 10

A 41-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes is unresponsive with a blood glucose level of 26 mg/dL. The only access obtained is a 24 gauge catheter in the back of the hand, which flushes sluggishly and is tender at the site. The vital signs are BP 118/72, P 104, R 14, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. Which concern most shapes the choice of dextrose concentration here?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Fifty percent dextrose damages tissue badly if it leaks out

Fifty percent dextrose is a thick, strongly hypertonic solution. It is hard on small veins even when it goes where it is supposed to, and when it leaks into the tissue it causes serious injury that can outlast everything else about the call. A small catheter in the back of the hand that is already sluggish and tender is exactly the setup for that. That hazard is a large part of why many systems now carry ten percent dextrose and give 100 to 250 mL titrated to mental status instead. The concentration is a local protocol matter, so know what your service carries, and let the quality of the access weigh on the choice.

Why the others are wrong

Fifty percent dextrose is too slow to act through a small catheter: Speed does matter with a glucose of 26, and it is true that a small catheter slows any infusion. Concentration does not change onset time in a meaningful way here, and thicker solutions are actually harder to push through a small catheter rather than slower to act.

Ten percent dextrose requires a central line to run safely: Central access does get required for some concentrated infusions, so the idea has a real basis. It applies to concentrated solutions rather than to dilute ones, and ten percent dextrose is the option specifically chosen to be gentler on peripheral veins.

Ten percent dextrose cannot raise a glucose level this low: Doubting a weaker solution feels prudent when the number is this low. Ten percent dextrose corrects hypoglycemia reliably; it simply takes a larger volume, which is why it is given as 100 to 250 mL titrated to mental status.

Question 4 of 10

A paramedic is called for a newborn delivered at home about 20 minutes ago to a mother whose pregnancy was complicated by diabetes. The newborn has been dried and covered, feels warm, and is breathing well, but is jittery with poor tone and a weak cry. The blood glucose level reads 38 mg/dL. Why is this newborn at particularly high risk for a low blood glucose level?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The newborn's own insulin ran high against a maternal glucose supply now cut off

A newborn of a diabetic mother spent the pregnancy attached to a glucose supply that ran higher than normal, and the newborn's own pancreas answered that supply by producing insulin at a matching rate. Delivery cuts the supply off in a moment. The insulin does not stop at the same moment, so for a while there is a newborn producing insulin for a glucose load that is no longer arriving, and the glucose falls. That is why a newborn of a diabetic mother sits at the top of the risk list, along with preterm, small, cold, and stressed newborns whose glycogen runs out quickly. In a newborn, a blood glucose below roughly 45 mg/dL is hypoglycemia, so 38 mg/dL is low, and the signs are the non-specific ones this newborn is showing: jitteriness, poor tone, and a weak cry. Correction uses 10% dextrose rather than the concentrations kept for older children and adults.

Why the others are wrong

The newborn's kidneys spill glucose into the urine until feeding is established: Spilling glucose into the urine is a real way to lose it, and it is the mechanism behind ketoacidosis with a normal glucose in an adult on certain diabetes medications. It is not how a healthy newborn kidney behaves, and nothing here points at it.

The mother's insulin crossed the placenta and is still circulating in the newborn: This is the most understandable version of the right idea, because insulin really is at the center of what is happening. The insulin in question is the newborn's own, which ran high in response to the mother's glucose before delivery and keeps working now that the supply it was answering has been cut off.

The newborn burned through its glycogen making heat during and after the delivery: Glycogen burned for heat is a genuine mechanism and it puts cold newborns on the same risk list. This newborn was dried, covered, and feels warm, so the vignette has taken that mechanism off the table and left the maternal history standing.

Question 5 of 10

A 57-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes was found unresponsive with a blood glucose level of 29 mg/dL. After intravenous dextrose the repeat reading is 118 mg/dL. Ten minutes later the patient is still unresponsive with no change in the examination and no movement to pain. The vital signs are BP 130/78, P 96, R 14, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. Which action best fits this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Widen the differential and look for a second cause of the coma

A treatment that does not work is telling you something, and what it is telling you is that your impression was incomplete. The glucose was low, you corrected it, the number is now 118, and the patient has not changed. That means the low glucose was not the whole story, or was not the story at all. The move is to reconsider rather than to repeat. Run the wide differential again: a head bleed, a postictal state, an overdose, hypoxia, sepsis, a stroke. Repeating a treatment that is not working is doubling down on a hypothesis the patient has already disproved, and it costs you the minutes in which the real problem was still findable.

Why the others are wrong

Give intramuscular glucagon to hold the glucose level up: Keeping the glucose from falling again is a legitimate worry, especially with long acting agents on board. Glucagon raises a glucose that is already normal at 118, and it does not address the reason this patient is still unresponsive.

Assume a slow awakening and hold further assessment until arrival: Delayed awakening after a long period of a low glucose is real, so this is not an absurd thought. Deciding that in advance and holding further assessment turns a hypothesis into a conclusion, and any second cause goes unfound for the whole transport.

Give a second dose of dextrose and recheck in ten minutes: Giving more of something that should have worked is the most natural reflex there is, and dosing really can be inadequate. The repeat reading of 118 shows the dose was adequate, so a second one corrects a number that is already corrected and buys nothing.

Question 6 of 10

A 70-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes has been declining for two weeks with constant urination. The skin is cool and mottled, the radial pulse is weak, capillary refill is four seconds, and the patient answers only to a loud voice. The vital signs are BP 76/44, P 132, R 24, and SpO₂ 93% on room air. The blood glucose level reads 764 mg/dL. How should this shock state be described?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Decompensated hypovolemic shock from the osmotic fluid loss

Two questions settle any shock description, and they are asked in order. Which category, then which stage. The category here is hypovolemic, because two weeks of osmotic diuresis has poured volume out through the kidney just as surely as bleeding or vomiting would. The stage is decompensated, because the compensating mechanisms have failed: the pressure is down at 76 over 44, the peripheral pulse is weak, and the mental status is falling. Compensated means the body is still holding the pressure up. There are two stages and only two, and both of them apply to all four categories, so a shock patient is described as compensated or decompensated and never as anything else.

Why the others are wrong

Compensated hypovolemic shock, since the heart rate is holding output: Tachycardia really is the hallmark of compensation and a rate of 132 shows the body is trying. Compensated means the pressure is still being held up, and at 76 over 44 with a weak radial pulse and a falling mental status the compensation has already failed.

Decompensated distributive shock from an underlying infection: Distributive shock is worth considering because infection is a common trigger for a hyperglycemic crisis, and the staging is correct. The mechanism here is volume poured out through the kidney rather than vessels dilating and leaking, and cool mottled skin argues against a distributive picture.

Irreversible shock, since the pressure and mentation are both falling: Describing a patient this sick in the strongest terms available feels honest, and the term appears in older materials. This program stages shock as compensated or decompensated only; there is no irreversible stage to assign.

Question 7 of 10

A 22-year-old patient with a suspected diabetic ketoacidosis has been receiving isotonic crystalloid for 25 minutes. On scene the EtCO₂ was 14 mmHg with deep respirations at a rate of 34. It now reads 29 mmHg, the rate has fallen to 20, and the patient is harder to rouse than on scene. The vital signs are BP 96/56, P 124, R 20, and SpO₂ 96% on room air. What does this change indicate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The respiratory compensation is failing as the patient tires

Numbers moving toward normal are not automatically good news. Read the carbon dioxide together with the respiratory rate and the mental status, because the three of them tell one story. Here the rate has dropped from 34 to 20 and the mental status has gotten worse, which means the patient is no longer able to sustain the minute volume that was holding the pH up. The carbon dioxide is climbing because the compensation is failing, not because the acid is gone. Twenty five minutes of fluid does not reverse a ketoacidosis. A rising end-tidal reading paired with worsening mentation means a patient who is tiring, and that patient needs ventilatory support matched to the effort they were making on their own.

Why the others are wrong

The glucose has fallen enough to slow the breathing down: The glucose does fall with fluid, so linking that to calmer breathing has a certain logic. The breathing is driven by the acid rather than by the glucose, and a falling glucose would not slow a compensatory pattern while the mental status worsens.

The acidosis is resolving as the fluid takes effect: A number heading back toward normal really does look like improvement, and fluid is the right treatment, so this is the reading most crews reach for first. Fluid does not resolve a ketoacidosis in 25 minutes, and a patient whose acidosis was clearing would be waking up rather than getting harder to rouse.

The reading has drifted because the cannula has shifted: Equipment problems are always worth ruling out and a shifted cannula does change the reading. A drifting sensor would not also drop the measured respiratory rate by fourteen and would not explain a patient who has become harder to rouse.

Question 8 of 10

An 81-year-old patient is found obtunded three days after a hospital discharge for pneumonia. The skin is dry and scaly, and the respirations are slow and shallow. The vital signs are BP 104/62, P 46, R 8, SpO₂ 91% on room air, and T 94°F. The EtCO₂ is 62 mmHg. What is most likely causing this presentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Myxedema coma

Myxedema coma is decompensated hypothyroidism, and it is the mirror image of thyroid storm. Learn it as cold, slow, and obtunded with a rising carbon dioxide: hypothermia, bradycardia, hypoventilation, dry scaly skin, and depressed mentation, usually in an older patient after surgery, an infection, or a sedative. The hypoventilation is what actually kills these patients, which makes the EtCO₂ of 62 mmHg the vital sign you are fighting for. Support the ventilations, rewarm passively, check a blood glucose level, and handle the patient gently.

Why the others are wrong

Thyroid storm: the same gland failing in the other direction, so a student who spots a thyroid problem still has to pick which way it went. Storm runs hot, fast, and agitated, with hyperthermia and marked tachycardia. Every vital sign here points the opposite way.

Adrenal crisis: belongs on the list for any patient who is weak and deteriorating after an illness. Its signature is hypotension that does not respond to fluid and pressors, and this blood pressure is 104/62. Adrenal crisis also does not bring hypothermia with a rising carbon dioxide.

Septic shock: A recent pneumonia makes sepsis a fair thought, and a septic patient can be hypothermic. Septic patients are typically tachycardic and hypotensive, and this patient is bradycardic with a blood pressure of 104/62. The dry scaly skin and the slow, shallow breathing point at the thyroid instead.

Question 9 of 10

A 68-year-old patient with a history of hypothyroidism is found lethargic at home during a cold spell. The skin is cool and dry, and the face appears puffy. The pupils are 4 mm and reactive. The patient responds only to a loud voice with slow, mumbled speech. The vital signs are BP 96/58, P 46, R 8, SpO₂ 91% on room air, and T 93°F. The blood glucose level is 88 mg/dL. What condition should the paramedic most strongly suspect?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Myxedema coma

Severe untreated hypothyroidism slows every metabolic process at once, and the field picture is the sum of that slowing: hypothermia the patient cannot correct, bradycardia, hypoventilation, dry puffy skin, and a falling level of consciousness. No single finding is specific, but the combination in a patient known to have hypothyroidism is myxedema coma. The value of recognizing it early is that the hypoventilation, not the thyroid state, is what kills these patients in the field.

Why the others are wrong

Opioid overdose: doesn't explain the hypothermia, bradycardia, and puffy facial appearance together. Those findings point toward a metabolic process tied to the patient's known hypothyroidism, not an opioid toxidrome.

Thyroid storm: produces the opposite picture: a hypermetabolic state with fever, tachycardia, and agitation, not the hypothermia, bradycardia, and hypoventilation seen in this patient.

Adrenal crisis: doesn't typically produce this specific combination of hypothermia, puffy dry skin, and slowed everything. That pattern is the signature of severe untreated hypothyroidism rather than adrenal insufficiency.

Question 10 of 10

An 8-month-old infant (8 kilograms) has vomited for 2 days and is now limp and difficult to arouse. The skin is pale and cool. The vital signs are P 172, R 46, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. The blood glucose level is 26 mg/dL. Intravenous access has been established. What is the most appropriate way to correct the blood glucose level?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · 10% dextrose at a weight-based dose

Infants run out of stored glucose quickly and tolerate concentrated sugar solutions poorly. The dextrose dose for a child is calculated by weight in grams per kilogram, and it is delivered in a dilute concentration so that the same number of grams arrives without the osmotic load and vein injury that a 50% solution causes in a small peripheral vessel. Concentration and dose are separate decisions, and getting the dose right does not excuse getting the concentration wrong.

Why the others are wrong

50% dextrose by rapid push: too concentrated for a small peripheral vein in an infant and carries an osmotic load and vein injury risk that a more dilute pediatric concentration avoids.

Oral glucose gel in the cheek: contraindicated in a limp, difficult-to-arouse infant who can't reliably swallow and protect the airway.

Glucagon by the intramuscular route: depends on liver glycogen stores to mobilize glucose, and it's a slower, less direct correction than dextrose delivered through the intravenous access this infant already has.

Find out which Paramedic topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every Paramedic topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free Paramedic diagnostic

More free Paramedic practice questions by topic