Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree Paramedic practice questions · EMS Operations

10 free Paramedic practice questions: Critical Care and Interfacility Transport

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT Paramedic content specifications and kept inside the Paramedic scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free Paramedic diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A paramedic is transporting a 66-year-old patient between hospitals with a unit of packed red blood cells infusing that was started at the sending facility. Fifteen minutes after departure the patient reports chills and low back pain, and the skin becomes flushed. The vital signs are BP 88/54, P 124, R 24, T 101.8°F, and SpO₂ 95% on room air. What should the paramedic do first?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Stop the transfusion and keep the line open with normal saline

Fever, chills, low back or flank pain, flushing and hypotension beginning shortly after a transfusion starts is the presentation of an acute hemolytic reaction, in which recipient antibodies destroy the transfused red cells, releasing free hemoglobin that loads the kidneys and setting off a systemic inflammatory response. The clinching feature is the combination of fever and back pain with hypotension rather than isolated itching or hives. Severity tracks the volume of incompatible blood delivered, so every additional milliliter adds injury, which makes stopping the infusion the single action that changes the outcome. The line itself is preserved and maintained with normal saline, the standard companion fluid for blood administration, because this hypotensive patient still needs access for volume resuscitation. The unit and tubing are kept and handed over so the receiving facility can investigate.

Why the others are wrong

Administer diphenhydramine and continue the transfusion: Diphenhydramine with continued transfusion is the right response to a mild allergic transfusion reaction, meaning urticaria and itching alone, with no fever and no hemodynamic change, where the transfusion may be paused, treated and resumed. This patient's findings are different in exactly the ways that matter: fever at 101.8, low back pain, and a pressure of 88/54. Those are hemolysis, not histamine, so this option treats the least dangerous possibility while leaving the cause running into the vein.

Slow the transfusion rate and continue monitoring: Slowing the rate and monitoring is the correct response to transfusion-associated circulatory overload, where the problem is the speed and volume rather than the product itself. It does not fit a hemolytic reaction, where the dose of incompatible cells determines severity, so a slower rate still delivers them and still worsens the injury. The key removes the cause completely; this option only reduces it and waits.

Complete the unit rapidly and reassess at the receiving facility: Finishing the unit and sorting it out at the hospital has surface appeal when transport is short, and there are interventions that reasonably get completed en route. This is the most harmful choice available here, because it delivers the entire remaining volume of incompatible product as fast as possible into a patient who is already hypotensive and febrile, maximizing hemolysis and renal injury. Every principle behind the key is inverted.

Question 2 of 10

During an interfacility transport, the transport ventilator on an intubated 52-year-old patient alarms for low peak inspiratory pressure and low exhaled tidal volume. The chest rise has become minimal and the EtCO₂ has fallen sharply. What is most likely causing these findings?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A leak or disconnection in the circuit

Ventilator alarms sort into two families that point in opposite directions. Low pressure with low exhaled volume means delivered gas is escaping before it reaches or returns from the lungs, which is a leak, a loose connection, a cuff problem, or a frank disconnection. High pressure with low exhaled volume means gas cannot get in, which is obstruction, bronchospasm, or reduced compliance such as a pneumothorax. Because the alarm here is low pressure, the paramedic traces the circuit from the tube to the machine before considering any cause inside the chest, and the minimal chest rise with a sharply falling EtCO₂ fits gas that never reached the alveoli at all.

Why the others are wrong

A developing tension pneumothorax: A tension pneumothorax genuinely does drop the EtCO₂ and flatten the chest rise, and it belongs at the top of the list for a ventilated patient who deteriorates suddenly, but it comes with unilateral absent breath sounds, jugular venous distention, tracheal deviation, and hypotension, and it alarms in the other direction. As the affected side collapses, the ventilator has to push against it, so the peak pressure rises. The question reports a low-pressure alarm, which is the finding that sends the paramedic to the circuit rather than to the chest.

A mucus plug in the endotracheal tube: a real and common cause of a sudden alarm with falling chest rise and a falling EtCO₂, so the presentation overlaps at first glance. The clinching difference is again the direction of the pressure: an obstruction means the ventilator is pushing a set volume against a blockage, so the peak inspiratory pressure climbs. Low pressure with low exhaled volume is a gas-escaping problem, not a gas-blocked problem, so a plug does not explain this alarm.

Bronchospasm from an airway irritant: raises resistance in the small airways and would come with wheezing, and it is a fair answer for a ventilated patient with a rising airway pressure. It belongs to the same can't-get-in family as the mucus plug and alarms high for the same reason. The key belongs to the can't-keep-it-in family, and reading which alarm fired tells the paramedic which family to search before ever laying hands on the patient.

Question 3 of 10

During transport, a 28-year-old patient who is severely agitated is secured face down on the stretcher with the wrists and ankles restrained behind the back. The patient continues to struggle against the restraints. The vital signs are BP 152/94, P 138, R 36, and SpO₂ 93% on room air. What should the paramedic do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Reposition the patient supine on the stretcher

A patient restrained face down with the limbs drawn behind the back cannot expand the chest wall or drop the diaphragm normally, and the weight of the torso against the stretcher adds to that load. A struggling patient is already producing a large metabolic acid load and needs a high minute volume to compensate, so restricting chest excursion at exactly that moment is what turns agitation into restraint asphyxia. The rising respiratory rate of 36 with a falling oxygen saturation of 93% on room air in a 28-year-old shows a patient working against that restriction and losing. Prone restraint is not a monitored position in any system, so the patient is repositioned supine or lateral with the airway visible, monitored continuously, and chemical sedation is considered so the struggle itself stops driving the acid load.

Why the others are wrong

Add a strap across the upper back and shoulders: A strap across the upper back and shoulders is standard, appropriate securing for an agitated patient lying supine on a stretcher, where it keeps the patient from sitting up without touching the chest's ability to expand. Applied to a patient who is already face down, it adds a second compressive load directly onto the part of the chest that cannot expand in the first place, which is the precise mechanism behind restraint asphyxia. The key removes the restriction while this choice deepens it, so they move in opposite directions on the finding that is killing the patient.

Continue transport and monitor the patient closely: Close monitoring is the correct answer for a properly restrained supine patient whose vital signs are stable, because the risk in that situation is a change over time and monitoring is what detects it. Here monitoring only documents a deterioration it cannot reverse, and a respiratory rate of 36 with a saturation of 93% in a young patient on room air is a body already failing to keep up. The key removes the mechanical cause, and no amount of watching changes a mechanical restriction.

Loosen the wrist restraints and continue transport: Checking and adjusting limb restraints is required care, since a restraint that is too tight compromises distal circulation, and loosening it is right when the wrists are cool, cyanotic, or pulseless. Loosening the wrists while the patient stays face down leaves the chest exactly as compressed as it was, and it also gives back the control that made the restraint necessary. The key targets the actual source of the danger, which is the prone position and the load on the torso, not the tension at the wrist.

Question 4 of 10

A paramedic requests a helicopter for a critically injured patient at a rural scene. The pilot declines the flight because of weather in the area. Ground transport to the trauma center will take 50 minutes. What should the paramedic do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Begin ground transport to the trauma center

A weather turndown is an aircraft and crew safety decision made by the pilot, and it is made without knowledge of the patient so that the severity of the injury cannot pressure the decision. Once a flight is declined, the transport clock is still running for a critically injured patient, so the available mode is used rather than waiting for an uncertain change in conditions. Calling one service after another until someone accepts, without disclosing the previous turndown, is helicopter shopping, and it is the behavior air medical safety programs exist to prevent, because it puts a second crew into the same weather the first crew refused. A subsequent service must be told that a prior turndown occurred.

Why the others are wrong

Hold the patient on scene until the weather improves: Holding on scene for weather is defensible only when there is no ground option or when nothing about the patient is time-critical: an extrication still in progress, for instance, where the patient cannot be moved yet. Neither applies here: ground transport is available and the patient is critically injured. Waiting spends the one resource that is actually being consumed, which is time, in exchange for a change in conditions that may never come, while the key starts closing the 50-minute gap immediately.

Request a second service without stating the turndown: Calling a second service is legitimate on its own: a different operator may fly a different aircraft from a different base under different local conditions, and there is no rule against asking. The defect is the omission built into this option. A service that is not told about the prior turndown is being asked to make a safety decision with information deliberately withheld, which is how a second crew ends up launching into the weather the first crew refused. If a second service is called, the earlier turndown is disclosed, and either way the ground unit should already be moving.

Ask the pilot to reconsider and attempt the flight: Asking the pilot to reconsider feels like advocating for the patient, which is what makes it the most tempting wrong answer. Pilots are intentionally kept blind to patient condition precisely so that no argument about how sick the patient is can weigh on a weather call. Pressing for a second look reintroduces exactly the pressure that the blindness was designed to remove, and it still does not move the patient any closer to the trauma center. The key accepts the turndown as final and spends the time on transport instead.

Question 5 of 10

A paramedic is preparing to transport an intubated patient from a critical access hospital to a receiving facility 2 hours away by ground. Which action should the paramedic take before departure?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Calculate the cylinder duration against the transport time

Oxygen is a consumable on a long transport, and the failure mode is running the cylinder dry short of the receiving facility, where there is no way to obtain more. Duration is determined by the gauge pressure, the cylinder constant, and the delivered flow, and the calculation is made against the anticipated transport time with a reserve for delays, traffic, and a diversion. This is a routine part of the pre-departure check on any long or rural transfer, along with confirming battery power, medication supply, and a backup means of ventilation. It is done before departure precisely because it cannot be corrected once the unit is on a two-hour road with no resupply.

Why the others are wrong

Reduce the positive end-expiratory pressure setting: Positive end-expiratory pressure is reduced for a specific clinical reason: hypotension from impaired venous return, or a concern about barotrauma, as a deliberate, titrated decision on a patient who is showing a problem with it. Nothing in this question says the current setting is causing harm, and lowering it routinely before a transport gives up alveolar recruitment on a patient whose settings are working, which shows up as worsening hypoxemia an hour down the road. The key changes nothing about the patient's care and instead checks the one supply that cannot be replenished en route.

Increase the delivered oxygen concentration to 100%: Turning the oxygen up to 100% is the right move for pre-oxygenation before a procedure or for a patient who is deteriorating and needs the reserve. Applied routinely to a two-hour transfer, it multiplies oxygen consumption, which makes the cylinder-duration problem worse rather than better: the two options touch the same supply from opposite ends. Oxygen concentration is titrated to the patient's saturation, not raised as a departure ritual.

Ventilate the patient with a BVM device: A BVM is the mandatory backup for a ventilated patient, and confirming that one is on board is genuinely part of the pre-departure check. That much of the option is right. Using it as the plan for the whole trip is not: it surrenders the controlled rate, tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure the patient is already established on, and it occupies a provider's hands for two hours. The key is the item that actually cannot be fixed once the doors close.

Question 6 of 10

A paramedic responds for a patient who has a left ventricular assist device and is now weak and confused. No radial or carotid pulse can be palpated, and the pulse oximeter does not display a waveform. A continuous mechanical hum is heard over the chest, and the device controller shows no alarms and is connected to power. How should the paramedic assess this patient's perfusion?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Obtain a mean arterial pressure by Doppler

A left ventricular assist device is a continuous-flow pump, moving blood in a steady stream rather than in pulses, so a patient with a working device commonly has no palpable radial or carotid pulse and no pulse oximetry waveform while perfusing perfectly well. Those two findings are expected rather than alarming, and neither can be used to declare this patient pulseless. The continuous mechanical hum over the chest, with a controller that shows no alarms and is connected to power, tells you the pump is running. What replaces the pulse is a manual blood pressure cuff with a Doppler over the brachial artery, where the first sound heard as the cuff deflates corresponds to the mean arterial pressure, the number that means something in continuous flow. Judge perfusion by that mean arterial pressure together with mental status and skin findings, and remember that the weakness and confusion still need a cause, which in these patients is often dehydration, hypovolemia, bleeding on anticoagulation, or a stroke.

Why the others are wrong

Begin chest compressions for pulselessness: Chest compressions are indicated when the patient is truly unresponsive with no signs of life and the pump is not working, meaning no hum and an alarming controller. Starting them here means treating expected findings as an arrest in a patient who is awake enough to be described as weak and confused. Compressions on a running device also risk dislodging the outflow cannula, so the key establishes whether this patient is actually perfusing before anyone begins.

Obtain an automated blood pressure reading: An automated cuff works by detecting oscillations produced by pulsatile flow, which is the one thing this circulation does not generate, so it typically fails to read or returns an unreliable number. Reaching for it is understandable because it is the routine tool, but a failed or falsely low automated reading in a device patient invites exactly the wrong conclusion. The key uses a method that does not depend on pulsatility at all.

Disconnect and reconnect the device controller: Cycling the controller is a troubleshooting step for a device that is alarming or has stopped, and it is done in consultation with the patient's device coordinator, who should be contacted early on any call like this. This controller has no alarms, is on power, and the pump is audibly running, so there is nothing to reset, and interrupting a functioning pump can stop the circulation outright. The key assesses the patient, while this option risks creating the arrest it is meant to prevent.

Question 7 of 10

A paramedic is transporting a 2-day-old neonate from a rural hospital to a children's hospital. The transport isolette failed shortly after departure, and the neonate has been covered with a blanket. Thirty minutes later the neonate is jittery and feeding poorly, the skin is mottled, the T is 95.2°F, and the blood glucose level is 32 mg/dL. The P is 168 and the SpO₂ is 96% on room air. What should the paramedic administer?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Dextrose 10% at 2 milliliters per kilogram

A cold neonate burns glucose rapidly to generate heat and has very little stored glycogen to draw on, so a failed isolette leads predictably to hypoglycemia. The two problems travel together, and the jitteriness, poor feeding, and mottled skin are what that combination looks like, confirmed by a temperature of 95.2 degrees Fahrenheit and a glucose of 32 mg/dL. Dextrose is the treatment and the concentration is the tested point: neonates receive a 10% solution, because the concentrated preparations used in adults are hypertonic enough to injure small peripheral veins and to cause dangerous fluid shifts in a neonate's circulation, including a risk of intraventricular hemorrhage. The standard neonatal dose is 2 mL/kg of 10% dextrose. Rewarming still has to happen, and the hypothermia is why this occurred at all, but the glucose is the deficit that has to be corrected right now.

Why the others are wrong

Dextrose 50% at 1 milliliter per kilogram: Dextrose 50% is the adult concentration, the correct drug at five times the strength this patient can tolerate. That hypertonicity is what damages small veins, shifts fluid across the fragile vessels of the neonatal brain, and carries the intraventricular hemorrhage risk, and 1 mL/kg of it is not a recognized neonatal dose. Right molecule and wrong concentration is the most common way this item is missed, and the key matches both the concentration and the volume to the patient's age.

Dextrose 25% at 4 milliliters per kilogram: Dextrose 25% is the pediatric concentration used in older infants and children, so it is a real preparation with a real indication, just not in a 2-day-old. Neonates specifically step down to 10%, and 4 mL/kg of a 25% solution delivers about five times the grams of glucose the key does. The trap is that it looks like a sensible middle ground between the adult and neonatal options, when the correct choice is set by the patient's age rather than by splitting the difference.

Glucagon at 0.5 milligrams intramuscularly: Glucagon works by mobilizing stored glycogen from the liver, which is why it is useful in an adult diabetic with no vascular access. A 2-day-old has minimal glycogen to begin with and has spent the last half hour burning through it trying to stay warm, so there is very little left for glucagon to release. The key supplies glucose directly rather than asking a depleted liver to produce it.

Question 8 of 10

A paramedic is transporting a patient who has an arterial sheath in place in the right groin after a cardiac catheterization. Twenty minutes into the transport, bright red blood soaks the dressing over the site and a firm swelling is developing in the groin. The vital signs are BP 104/62 and P 108. What should the paramedic do first?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Apply firm manual pressure above the insertion site

The bleeding point is not where the sheath crosses the skin. It is the puncture in the femoral artery itself, and because the vessel is entered at an angle, that arteriotomy sits proximal to the skin entry. That is the whole reason firm manual pressure goes just above the skin site: it compresses the artery against the femoral head, and that bony backstop is what makes manual pressure work at all. Bright red blood soaking the dressing with a firm, growing groin swelling is arterial bleeding with an expanding hematoma, and a pulse of 108 against a narrowing pressure says it is already costing volume. The sheath stays in place, because it partially occupies and tamponades the hole it made and because removal is a deliberate procedure with its own hemodynamic consequences; the leg stays straight, and the swelling gets reassessed continuously, since the groin and retroperitoneum will hold a large volume of blood before it ever looks impressive from outside.

Why the others are wrong

Remove the sheath and apply a pressure dressing: Removing the sheath and dressing the site is what the receiving facility does under controlled conditions, with staff, monitoring, and a plan for sustained pressure. Pulling it in a moving ambulance opens the arteriotomy fully by removing the object partially plugging it, and sheath removal carries a well-described vagal response that this already tachycardic, borderline hypotensive patient cannot absorb. The key achieves hemostasis without enlarging the defect.

Flex the hip to slow the flow of blood through the vessel: Flexing the hip is exactly backwards. Patients with a femoral sheath are kept with the leg straight and the head of the bed low precisely because hip flexion kinks the sheath, disrupts the puncture site, and promotes bleeding. Flexion is a maneuver that opens this bleed rather than slowing it. There is also no vascular mechanism by which bending a hip reduces flow through an arterial puncture the way direct compression does.

Apply a tourniquet to the thigh above the swelling: A thigh tourniquet is the right tool for exsanguinating extremity hemorrhage when you can place it proximal to the bleeding and get circumferential occlusion. A common femoral puncture in the groin is proximal to any usable tourniquet site, so this is junctional hemorrhage by definition, and junctional bleeding is managed with direct or purpose-built junctional pressure. Placing a tourniquet below the bleeding point occludes outflow to a leg while doing nothing at all to the vessel that is actually bleeding.

Question 9 of 10

A paramedic is transporting an intubated patient who received a long-acting neuromuscular blocking medication immediately before departure. The transport ventilator is set at a rate of 14, but the displayed total rate is 32 and the EtCO₂ has fallen from 38 to 25 mmHg. The peak inspiratory pressure is unchanged, the exhaled tidal volume matches the set volume, and water has collected in a dependent loop of the ventilator circuit. What is most likely causing the increased rate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Condensate in the circuit is triggering extra breaths

A ventilator delivers an assisted breath whenever it senses the small drop in pressure or change in flow that a patient's inspiratory effort produces at the circuit. Water pooled in a dependent loop sloshes with every bump and turn in a moving ambulance and generates exactly that signal, so the ventilator auto-triggers and delivers breaths nobody asked for, which is why the total rate reads 32 against a set rate of 14. Those extra breaths raise minute ventilation, and minute ventilation is what clears carbon dioxide, so the EtCO2 falls from 38 to 25 just as it did here. The finding that proves the signal is artifact rather than patient effort is the long-acting neuromuscular blocking medication given immediately before departure, since a fully paralyzed patient cannot generate an inspiratory effort at all. The correction is to drain the condensate, reposition the tubing so it stops collecting in a dependent loop, and reduce the trigger sensitivity.

Why the others are wrong

A leak in the circuit is causing repeated breath delivery: A circuit leak is a genuine and common transport ventilator problem, and hunting for one is a reasonable early step in any ventilator troubleshooting. A leak announces itself with an exhaled tidal volume lower than the set volume and usually a falling peak inspiratory pressure or a low-pressure alarm, and this question hands you the opposite, with exhaled tidal volume matching the set volume and peak pressure unchanged, so the circuit is intact. The key beats it because condensate explains the extra breaths while leaving volumes and pressures normal, which is exactly the pattern described.

The patient is breathing above the set rate: A patient breathing above the set rate is by far the most common reason a total rate exceeds a set rate, and on nearly any other call this would be the answer. The long-acting neuromuscular blocker given immediately before departure is the clinching finding that rules it out, because a paralyzed patient has no diaphragmatic effort available to trigger with. The key beats it by explaining the same auto-triggering pattern using the one source of a trigger signal that paralysis does not remove, which is water in the circuit.

The endotracheal tube has migrated into a mainstem bronchus: A tube that has migrated into a mainstem bronchus is a real hazard in transport, especially with movement and repositioning, and it deserves a place on the differential. It presents with a rising peak inspiratory pressure as the set volume is forced into one lung and with unilaterally diminished breath sounds, neither of which is described here, and it has no mechanism at all for increasing the ventilator's rate. The key beats it because the abnormality being explained is the rate itself, and tube depth does not touch the trigger.

Question 10 of 10

A paramedic is transporting an intubated patient with a small, untreated pneumothorax by helicopter. As the aircraft climbs to cruising altitude, the peak inspiratory pressure rises from 22 to 41 cm H₂O, breath sounds diminish further on the affected side, and the vital signs change from BP 118/76 and P 96 to BP 78/44 and P 138. The trachea shifts away from the affected side. What should the paramedic do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Perform needle decompression of the affected side

Ambient pressure falls as altitude increases, and a gas's volume is inversely proportional to the pressure acting on it, so a trapped pocket of air, including an untreated pneumothorax, expands during ascent even with no change in the patient's underlying condition. Under positive pressure ventilation this expansion can progress rapidly to tension physiology, shown here by the rising peak pressure, worsening unilateral breath sounds, tracheal shift, and shock. This finding set is treated immediately with needle decompression, which releases the trapped, expanding air causing the tension. Requesting descent slows further expansion but does not evacuate the air already causing tension physiology.

Why the others are wrong

Request that the aircraft descend to a lower altitude: Requesting a lower altitude slows further expansion of the trapped air but doesn't evacuate the air that's already causing tension physiology right now.

Increase the positive end-expiratory pressure: Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure doesn't address a developing tension pneumothorax and can actually worsen intrathoracic pressure in this situation.

Disconnect the patient from the ventilator and ventilate manually: Disconnecting from the ventilator and manually ventilating doesn't relieve the trapped, expanding air causing the tension: decompression is what's needed.

Find out which Paramedic topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every Paramedic topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free Paramedic diagnostic

More free Paramedic practice questions by topic