Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree Paramedic practice questions · Clinical Judgment

9 free Paramedic practice questions: Ethical and High-Stakes Decision-Making

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT Paramedic content specifications and kept inside the Paramedic scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 9, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free Paramedic diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 9

Officers place a 34-year-old patient on a psychiatric hold after threats of self-harm and ask the crew to transport to the hospital. The patient is calm, answers every question, and states that the trip is unwanted. Which type of consent covers this transport?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Involuntary consent, because legal authority has already made the decision

This transport runs on involuntary consent. The type of consent depends on who holds the authority, not on how calm the patient sounds. Officers placed this patient on a psychiatric hold after threats of self-harm. A psychiatric hold is a legal authority that has already made the decision, and custody works the same way. Involuntary consent covers care given under that legal authority. The patient being calm and answering every question does not change who made the decision. Ask who is authorizing this contact. Here the hold authorizes the transport. You transport on the hold even though the patient sounds reasonable and says the trip is unwanted.

Why the others are wrong

Expressed consent, because the patient is calm enough to answer questions: A calm patient who answers every question looks like a patient giving expressed consent. Expressed consent is the patient saying yes, and this patient is saying no.

Informed consent, because the risks of staying home were explained on scene: Informed consent is the standard for a patient who is agreeing to care. Informed consent describes how that yes was obtained. There is no yes here for informed consent to describe.

Implied consent, because a threat of self-harm shows impaired judgment: A self-harm threat does raise a real concern about judgment. Implied consent covers a patient who cannot communicate a decision at all. This patient is communicating a decision clearly.

Question 2 of 9

A 29-year-old patient who swung at the crew during loading is restrained for transport. Ten minutes later the patient is quiet, apologizes, and lies still. A crew member wants the restraints left on for the rest of the trip so the patient learns not to swing at people. What is wrong with that reasoning?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Restraint is justified by the reasonable prevention of harm, not by punishment

Restraint is only justified to reasonably prevent harm to the patient or to someone else. Restraint can never be a punishment. This patient swung at the crew, so restraint made sense during loading. Ten minutes later, the patient is quiet, apologizes, and lies still. Keeping the restraints on so the patient learns a lesson is punishment. Once the reason for restraint is gone, the justification is gone too. Keeping a patient restrained without a safety reason opens you up to abandonment, false imprisonment, assault, and battery. Keep reassessing a restrained patient the whole time. At every check, document why the restraints are still on. The reason always has to be safety.

Why the others are wrong

Restraint is lawful only after a patient has been formally placed on a hold: A formal hold does change what you can do with a patient who wants to leave. Restraint to prevent harm does not have to wait for a hold. A hold would not make punishment okay either.

Restraint authority passes to law enforcement the moment an officer boards: Officers often help make restraint physically possible. Once the patient is in your ambulance and in your care, the medical decision to keep the restraints on stays with you.

Restraint may continue only while medical direction stays on the radio: Calling medical direction about a restrained patient is good practice, and many systems want that call. Staying on the radio is not what makes restraint lawful. The reason for the restraint is what makes restraint lawful.

Question 3 of 9

A 68-year-old patient in cardiac arrest has been worked for twenty-eight minutes with an initial rhythm of asystole, four doses of epinephrine given, and a confirmed advanced airway. The rhythm is still asystole and the crew is considering stopping. What governs whether this resuscitation may be terminated?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The system's own criteria, which usually require online medical control

Stopping this resuscitation depends on your own system's criteria, and most systems require online medical control. Withholding and terminating both end with no resuscitation, but they are different decisions. Withholding uses universal criteria. Death is obvious, and no clinical judgment is involved. Terminating is the opposite. Each system builds its own termination criteria. The criteria include the initial rhythm, whether a pulse ever came back, and how long the arrest has run. Whether the arrest was witnessed, bystander CPR, and the care already delivered count too. Your medical director sets those criteria. An option that hands you one exact number, like three doses of epinephrine or twenty minutes, is going to be the least correct. The right answer depends on protocol, with medical control involved.

Why the others are wrong

The same universal criteria that govern withholding a resuscitation: Universal criteria are the rules for withholding a resuscitation. Those criteria describe a patient who was obviously dead before you arrived. This patient has been worked by your crew for twenty-eight minutes.

The crew's judgment at the scene, which is what autonomy is built for: Paramedic autonomy is real, and it is broader than at any level below. Autonomy works inside protocol. Termination is one of the decisions the system keeps shared on purpose.

A fixed national rule, which sets termination at three doses of epinephrine: Some systems do put a dose count in their termination criteria. A number from one system is not a national rule. No national rule sets termination at three doses of epinephrine.

Question 4 of 9

A paramedic is handed two documents for a 79-year-old patient, a health care proxy form and a signed POLST form. A partner asks what the difference between the two actually is. Which statement is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A proxy names a person to decide, and a POLST is a physician's medical order

A health care proxy names a person to make decisions. A POLST is a physician's medical order. The proxy is somebody the patient chose ahead of time to decide for them when they cannot decide. The POLST is signed by the patient and a physician. The POLST tells field providers which life-sustaining treatments to give or hold. MOLST is the same idea under a different name, and states use one or the other. A do-not-resuscitate order is another physician order like the POLST. On scene, you carry out a POLST like any other physician order.

Why the others are wrong

A proxy expires each year, and a POLST is permanent once it has been signed: Expiration is a real thing to check. Whether a document is current is one of the four validity questions. Neither a proxy nor a POLST expires each year on its own. Calling a POLST permanent also skips the question of whether it was revoked.

A proxy takes effect at arrest, and a POLST covers every hospital admission: Cardiac arrest is when these papers usually come out of a drawer. A proxy applies any time the patient cannot make a decision. Plenty of those times are nowhere near an arrest.

A proxy is a legal document, and a POLST is a guideline the crew may weigh: A proxy is a legal document, so the first half of option C is right. The second half is wrong. A POLST is not a guideline you weigh against your own read of the scene. A POLST is a physician's medical order, and you follow an order.

Question 5 of 9

A 74-year-old patient is in cardiac arrest at home. On the counter is a POLST form directing no resuscitation, signed by the patient and a physician eight months ago, matching the patient's name, and applicable to cardiac arrest. The patient's spouse is distraught and asks the crew to do everything. What governs the crew's action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The signed form, because it records the patient's own verified wishes

The signed POLST form governs, because the form records the patient's own verified wishes. Check four things before you follow any directive. The form has to be properly filled out and signed, and the form cannot be expired or revoked. The form has to match this patient and apply to this situation. All four check out here. The patient and a physician signed the form eight months ago, the name matches, and the form covers cardiac arrest. The spouse did not sign the form, and a family member's wishes at the bedside do not override a valid form. The spouse's distress is real, and the distress is still not a competing order. Stay with the family, confirm death per protocol, and explain plainly what is happening. Give the family the time they need.

Why the others are wrong

The crew's own read, because the patient is dying in front of them right now: A crew with a dying patient does have real authority to act, and holding back feels wrong. Your judgment is for questions the patient has not already answered. This patient answered this one in writing, with a physician.

A call to medical control, because a family objection makes the form unclear: Call medical control the moment any of the four checks comes back unclear. Nothing on this form is unclear. A family objection is not one of the four checks.

The spouse's request, because a family member present can revoke the document: Whether the form was revoked is one of the four things you check. Only the patient who signed the form can revoke it. A family member asking at the bedside is not the patient revoking anything.

Question 6 of 9

A paramedic faces a decision on a call that no protocol addresses and that the crew has not met before, with no clean rule to apply. Which three questions make up the ethical tests used for a case like this?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Am I doing no harm, acting in good faith, and in the patient's best interest?

The three ethical tests are no harm, good faith, and the patient's best interest. Ask yourself: Am I doing no harm? Am I acting in good faith? Is this in the patient's best interest? When no protocol or rule covers a hard call, you still have these three questions to work from. They are simple on purpose, so you can use them at three in the morning with a family watching you. Scope, protocol, and credentialing tell you what you are allowed to do. Documentation matters after the call, not while you are making the decision. Both are real duties, and neither one is the ethical test.

Why the others are wrong

Is it billable, is it defensible in court, and is my service protected from it?: Liability does come up on hard calls. A test that starts with billing and protecting the service puts the patient last. An ethical test is supposed to put the patient first.

Have I documented the call, notified medical control, and filed a report on it?: Documenting the call and notifying medical control are real duties, and a hard call gets reviewed based on the record you leave. These are things you do about a decision after you make it. They are not the questions you use to make the decision.

Am I inside my scope, inside protocol, and credentialed for this specific skill?: Scope, protocol, and credentialing are the three layers of authority, and all three have to line up before you act. These three tell you whether you are allowed to do something. They do not tell you whether you should do it.

Question 7 of 9

The paramedic responds to a witnessed cardiac arrest at home. Family is present and distressed, and hands the paramedic a document they say is a do-not-resuscitate (DNR), but it is unsigned, undated, and does not clearly name this patient. They insist it reflects the patient's wishes and ask the paramedic to honor it. What is the most appropriate action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Because the document's validity cannot be reasonably confirmed, begin resuscitation and contact medical control rather than withholding care

You cannot confirm this DNR is valid. The document is unsigned, undated, and does not clearly name this patient. When a DNR cannot be reasonably confirmed, the standard default is to start resuscitation. Contact medical control for guidance while you work. You do not withhold care based on a document you cannot confirm.

Why the others are wrong

Honor the family's account of the patient's wishes, and withhold resuscitation, since they know the patient best: The family may know the patient's wishes. Their word alone does not make this document a valid directive. Withholding resuscitation on their account risks withholding it from a patient who has no confirmed valid directive.

Withhold resuscitation because any DNR-like document should be honored regardless of whether it can be verified: A valid DNR that applies to this patient should be honored. This document cannot be verified as valid or as belonging to this patient. An unverified document is not treated as a confirmed directive.

Delay any decision, neither beginning resuscitation nor declining to do so, until the family is able to produce a fully valid document: Waiting for a fully valid document means doing nothing for a patient in cardiac arrest. The standard default is to start resuscitation while you get guidance, instead of putting off every decision.

Question 8 of 9

A paramedic is caring for a critically ill patient when a bystander produces identification showing they are a licensed physician and directs the paramedic to give a medication that is not carried in the regional protocol. The physician has not examined the patient and is not the patient's treating physician. What should the paramedic do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Contact online medical direction before acting

Contact online medical direction before you act on the order. A paramedic practices under a specific medical director's license and that system's protocols. That delegation is the only thing that gives you the authority to give a drug. A bystander physician does not take over that role by showing a license. This physician has not examined the patient and is not the treating physician. The drug is not even carried in the regional protocol. Put the physician in contact with online medical direction, because online medical direction is your actual medical authority. If medical direction agrees, care can go forward under that direction. The physician then formally takes over care, documents the care, and goes with the patient to the hospital. If you cannot reach medical direction, or medical direction does not agree, keep following your existing protocol.

Why the others are wrong

Ask the physician to leave the patient care area: Asking a bystander to leave is right when the bystander is getting in the way of care, acting abusive, or making the scene unsafe. In those cases, removal is appropriate, with law enforcement if needed. This physician is offering help and showed valid identification. Sending the physician away skips the one step that could make the order usable. Call medical control first. Removal is the fallback if the physician refuses to work inside the system.

Follow the physician's order without further steps: Following an order without further steps is right when the order comes from your own online medical direction or is already in standing protocol. A bystander physician's license does not extend your scope. This drug is not carried in the region at all. Giving the drug puts you outside the system that authorizes you to practice, and you are personally exposed. A physician who is willing to help still has no authority to direct your care.

Give the medication if the physician documents it: The physician documenting the order and taking over care is a real part of this process. Documenting and taking over come after medical direction agrees, not in place of that call. Documentation only records what happened. A signature on the run form does not create authority that was not there before. A signature also does not put the drug inside your protocol.

Question 9 of 9

The crew is dispatched for an unresponsive worker inside a grain storage building. On arrival, two workers are lying motionless on the floor about 30 feet inside the single doorway, and a third worker who entered to help them has staggered back out and is sitting near the door, confused and unable to answer questions. The building has no windows. No trauma, fire, or spilled product is visible. The time of the call is 1420. What should the paramedic do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Stage outside and request a rescue team

Assume the air inside this building is low in oxygen or toxic. Two workers are down in the same enclosed space with no visible injury, fire, or spilled product. A windowless grain storage building is a classic place for bad air. Stored grain uses up oxygen as it ferments and can give off toxic gases, and with no windows the air does not get replaced. The third worker walked in healthy and staggered back out confused. The air inside is doing to the third worker what it already did to the first two. Going in safely takes air monitoring, supplied-air breathing equipment with training to use it, and a confined space rescue plan. This crew has none of those. Stage outside, set up a perimeter, and keep bystanders from going in. Request a rescue team that can enter, and be ready to treat patients the moment they are brought out.

Why the others are wrong

Enter and remove the patients quickly: Going in to pull the patients out fast is the most common way rescuers die at these scenes. Moving fast does not protect you from bad air. The third worker only got about 30 feet in and came out unable to answer questions. A crew that goes down inside turns two patients into four, and then nobody is left to give care.

Enter wearing an NRB: A nonrebreather mask (NRB) gives a patient oxygen from a tank while the patient still breathes the air around the mask. An NRB is a treatment device, not breathing protection. The mask does not seal the wearer off from the air in the building. An NRB is the right device for these patients after they are brought out. Only a supplied-air system with a sealed facepiece protects someone going in, and the rescue team brings one.

Enter after propping the door open: Opening the door is a step toward ventilation, and ventilation is part of making a confined space safe. Real ventilation means mechanical ventilation, followed by air monitoring that shows the atmosphere is safe. One open door in a windowless building moves almost no air. Nothing here shows the air inside has changed. Someone has to measure the air before anyone goes in.

Find out which Paramedic topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every Paramedic topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free Paramedic diagnostic

More free Paramedic practice questions by topic