Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree EMT practice questions · Secondary Assessment

10 free EMT practice questions: Focused Physical Exam

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A 45-year-old patient was struck across the chest by a falling steel beam at a construction site. During the chest exam the EMT sees a section of the left chest wall move inward as the patient breathes in and outward as the patient breathes out. Breath sounds are present on both sides. The vital signs are BP 134/82 mmHg, P 112/min, R 26/min, and SpO₂ 93% on room air. What does this finding indicate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Flail chest

A segment of chest wall that moves opposite to the rest of the chest has lost its bony connection to the rib cage, which happens when at least two side-by-side ribs are each broken in at least two places. That free-floating segment is pulled inward by the negative pressure of inhalation instead of expanding with the chest. The movement itself is the diagnostic finding, and it tells the EMT the patient will need ventilatory support as the underlying lung injury declares itself.

Why the others are wrong

Simple rib fracture: A simple rib fracture doesn't produce paradoxical chest wall movement. That specific finding requires a free-floating segment, which needs multiple ribs broken in multiple places.

Open chest wound: An open chest wound would show air moving through a hole in the chest wall with a sucking or bubbling sound, not a segment of chest wall moving opposite the rest of the chest.

Pulmonary contusion: A pulmonary contusion is a lung tissue injury that doesn't by itself cause the chest wall to move paradoxically. That finding specifically indicates the chest wall has lost its normal bony connection to the rib cage.

Question 2 of 10

During a secondary assessment of a 22-year-old patient injured in a motor vehicle crash, the EMT auscultates the left thorax and notes absent breath sounds on the left side compared to clear breath sounds on the right. The patient reports left-sided chest pain and is mildly short of breath. Skin is slightly pale but perfusion is intact. Which finding is most significant in this presentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The asymmetric breath sounds indicate a pneumothorax and justify urgent transport

Asymmetric breath sounds, absent on one side and present on the other, are a hallmark of pneumothorax. In a trauma patient with mechanism (MVC), chest pain, and absent left-sided breath sounds, pneumothorax is the leading diagnosis. A simple pneumothorax can worsen into tension pneumothorax during transport if not monitored closely, making urgent transport and high-flow oxygen essential. The patient's young age and currently intact perfusion are reassuring but do not rule out progression; the finding of absent breath sounds on one side is the critical recognition point. Mild respiratory distress does not exclude pneumothorax. Early or simple pneumothorax can present with minimal symptoms, but the absence of breath sounds on one side is definitive for alveolar collapse or air in the pleural space. Young age is not a protective factor. Pneumothorax can occur at any age, and a patient with this mechanism and this finding must be transported urgently, not observed at home without advanced life support available. Perfusion status (intact skin color and temperature) reflects the patient's current hemodynamic state, not the integrity of the lungs. A patient can have normal perfusion with a simple pneumothorax; progression to tension pneumothorax would compromise perfusion.

Why the others are wrong

The mild respiratory distress rules out a serious lung injury: Mild respiratory distress doesn't rule out a serious lung injury. Early or simple pneumothorax can present with minimal symptoms, and the absent breath sounds on one side are the definitive finding here regardless of how mild the distress looks.

The patient's age means pneumothorax is unlikely and can be observed at home: The patient's young age doesn't make pneumothorax unlikely, and this mechanism plus this specific finding requires urgent transport with advanced life support available, not observation at home.

The intact skin perfusion rules out any involvement of the circulatory system: Intact skin perfusion reflects the current hemodynamic state, not the integrity of the lung itself. A patient can have completely normal perfusion with a simple pneumothorax that could still progress to tension physiology.

Question 3 of 10

An EMT is examining a 29-year-old patient who fell from a ladder onto a concrete floor. While palpating the left elbow the EMT feels a grating sensation under the fingertips. The patient reports no pain at that elbow, moves the arm fully, and has no swelling or deformity there. The vital signs are BP 128/76 mmHg, P 90/min, and R 18/min. What should the EMT do before recording this finding as crepitus?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Palpate the right elbow and compare the two findings

Comparing one side of the body with the other is an integral part of the physical examination, and it is what makes a one-sided finding meaningful. A grating sensation is what crepitus describes, but the other arm is checked before the EMT determines that the sensation is caused by fractured bone ends or joints rubbing together. With no pain, swelling, or deformity at the elbow, the EMT has no other evidence of injury, so the matching elbow on the opposite side is checked before the sensation is attributed to injury and recorded as crepitus.

Why the others are wrong

Record it as crepitus and continue the head-to-toe exam: A student picks this because grating and crepitus sound like the same thing. Crepitus means fractured bone ends or joint surfaces rubbing, which is a conclusion about the cause; some joints grate at baseline, and the finding is not established until the other side has been checked.

Palpate the left elbow again using firmer pressure: A student picks this because they think a doubtful finding is settled by pressing harder. More pressure produces the same sensation more strongly and still cannot separate an injury from a joint that grates normally.

Palpate the left shoulder and wrist for the same sensation: A student picks this because they know to compare but compare along the same limb. Comparison is made with the matching site on the opposite side of the body; the shoulder and wrist are different joints and tell the EMT nothing about whether this elbow is normal for this patient.

Question 4 of 10

An EMT is examining a 62-year-old patient who fell down a flight of stairs. The patient is alert and reports numbness. During the extremity exam the patient cannot feel a gentle pinch on either hand or either foot and cannot move the fingers or the toes. No extremity is deformed or swollen, and the distal pulses are strong in all four. The vital signs are BP 108/66 mmHg, P 62/min, and R 18/min. What do these extremity findings most likely indicate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Spinal cord injury

Deficit distribution is what localizes the injury. An inability to move a single extremity points to a bone, muscle, or nerve injury in that limb, and an inability to feel sensation in one extremity points to a local nerve injury; when several extremities lose movement and sensation together, the finding points to the spinal cord instead. Here all four limbs have lost both pinch sensation and voluntary movement while the distal pulses are strong and no limb is deformed, so no local limb explanation covers the pattern. Loss of sensation in several extremities is the finding the source attributes specifically to spinal cord injury.

Why the others are wrong

Local nerve injury in each limb: A student picks this because they read each limb on its own and a single limb that cannot feel or move does suggest a local nerve injury. Four limbs failing at once is not four separate local injuries; loss of sensation and movement in several extremities points to the spinal cord, where one lesion accounts for all of them.

Fractures of both wrists and both ankles: A student picks this because they attribute an inability to move to broken bones. The question states that no extremity is deformed or swollen, and fractures would not explain loss of sensation to pinch in all four limbs.

Impaired circulation to all four extremities: A student picks this because pale or poorly perfused limbs can lose feeling. Strong distal pulses in all four extremities are stated, so circulation to the limbs is intact and cannot be the explanation.

Question 5 of 10

An EMT is examining a 71-year-old patient who is unresponsive after being found at the bottom of a staircase. The airway is clear, breathing is adequate, and spinal motion restriction is being maintained. There is no external bleeding and no obvious deformity of any extremity. The vital signs are BP 138/86 mmHg, P 78/min, R 14/min, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. Which part of the extremity assessment can the EMT still complete on this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Distal pulses, skin color, and temperature

Most of the sensory and motor examination depends on the patient's cooperation: grip strength has to be squeezed on request, sensation has to be reported, and movement of the fingers and toes has to be performed on command. None of that is available in an unresponsive patient. What remains are the findings the EMT can obtain by touching and looking, so the extremity assessment is reduced to the circulatory portion: palpating the distal pulses and evaluating the color and temperature of the hands and feet, comparing one side with the other.

Why the others are wrong

Grip strength compared between the two hands: A student picks this because grip strength is part of the extremity exam they have practiced. Comparing grip strength requires the patient to squeeze on request, so an unresponsive patient cannot produce the finding.

Sensation reported after a gentle pinch of a toe: A student picks this because the pinch is something the EMT does and therefore feels available. The finding is the patient's report of what was done to which finger or toe, and that report cannot come from an unresponsive patient.

Movement of the fingers and toes on command: A student picks this because moving the fingers and toes seems like the simplest test in the set. It is a command, and the patient has to follow it for the result to mean anything.

Question 6 of 10

An EMT is examining a 55-year-old patient who reports difficulty breathing and is seated on the edge of a bed wearing a thick sweatshirt. The EMT places the stethoscope on top of the sweatshirt and hears faint, scratchy sounds over both sides of the chest. The room is quiet. The vital signs are BP 142/88 mmHg, P 104/min, R 24/min, and SpO₂ 92% on room air. What should the EMT do about these breath sounds?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Place the stethoscope against the bare skin and listen again

Breath sounds are muted by clothing, and a stethoscope placed on fabric mostly transmits the sound of its own head sliding on the cloth, which is what faint and scratchy describes. The clothing is lifted or the stethoscope is slid underneath it, and the diaphragm is placed firmly against the bare skin. With the patient seated, the back is accessible, and matched sites on both sides can then be compared. Until the diaphragm is on skin the EMT has no usable breath sound finding to record or act on.

Why the others are wrong

Record faint breath sounds over both sides of the chest: A student picks this because a reading was obtained and they document what they heard. Breath sounds are muted by clothing, and what the stethoscope picked up over the sweatshirt is largely the sound of the head sliding on the fabric, so the finding does not describe this patient's air movement.

Press the stethoscope harder onto the sweatshirt: A student picks this because more pressure usually means a better seal. Pressing harder on fabric increases the rubbing noise rather than removing it; the diaphragm has to be against the skin.

Move the patient to the ambulance and listen there: A student picks this because they attribute unclear breath sounds to a noisy scene. The question states the room is quiet, so ambient noise is not the problem, and moving the patient delays a finding that can be obtained where the patient is sitting.

Question 7 of 10

An EMT is examining a 43-year-old patient who reports two days of feeling hot and weak. The EMT needs to judge whether the skin is unusually warm and also to determine whether a swollen area on the left calf feels firm or soft. The patient is alert, and the vital signs are BP 118/72 mmHg, P 104/min, R 18/min, and T 101°F. How should the EMT use the hands for these two parts of the exam?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The back of the hand for temperature and the fingertips for the swelling

The two halves of this exam call for different surfaces of the same hand. The fingertips are best suited to detecting texture and consistency, so they are what tells the EMT whether the swollen calf is firm or soft. The back of the hand is best suited to noting temperature, so it is what tells the EMT whether the skin is unusually warm. Choosing correctly requires both pairings, since either one alone leaves half the exam being done with the wrong surface.

Why the others are wrong

The fingertips for temperature and the back of the hand for the swelling: A student picks this because they remember that the two surfaces have different jobs but invert which is which. The fingertips are the sensitive surface for texture and consistency, and the back of the hand is the surface used to judge temperature, so this reverses both halves.

The fingertips for both the temperature and the swelling: A student picks this because the fingertips are the part of the hand used for almost everything else in the exam. Fingertips are correct for the swelling, but the back of the hand is the surface suited to noting temperature, so half of this pairing is wrong.

The back of the hand for both the temperature and the swelling: A student picks this because they learned the back of the hand as the skin-assessment surface and apply it to the whole skin exam. The back of the hand is correct for temperature but cannot resolve texture and consistency, which is what the swollen calf question requires.

Question 8 of 10

What does the C in DCAP-BTLS stand for?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Contusions

DCAP-BTLS is the memorized checklist for the physical exam, and the C in it stands for contusions, meaning bruising or a collection of blood under the skin. That's why you call out contusions when you reach the C during the exam.

Why the others are wrong

Cyanosis: describes bluish skin from poor oxygenation, a real finding you watch for, but it belongs to skin assessment, not to this particular mnemonic.

Crepitus: a genuine finding you palpate for, a grating sensation from broken bone ends, and it's close because it's also a physical-exam term for trauma, but it still isn't one of the letters spelled out in DCAP-BTLS.

Crackles: a lung sound heard on auscultation, a real finding you're trained to listen for, but DCAP-BTLS is a mnemonic for inspecting and palpating injury sites, not an auscultation checklist, so crackles doesn't fit it either.

Question 9 of 10

EMS responds to an industrial accident where heavy machinery cannot be immediately shut off, creating continuous loud noise at the scene. A 58-year-old patient struck by falling equipment is confused and restless, with pale, cool, diaphoretic skin. The EMT cannot hear Korotkoff sounds through the stethoscope over the machinery noise, and transport is about to begin. Given this equipment limitation, how should the EMT obtain a blood pressure reading?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Palpate the radial pulse while deflating the cuff and record that systolic value

When Korotkoff sounds cannot be heard, such as in a loud environment or in a hypotensive, poorly perfused patient, blood pressure should be measured by palpation: inflate the cuff, then palpate the radial pulse while slowly deflating it, and record the pressure at which the pulse returns as the systolic pressure. This method does not determine the diastolic pressure and should be documented as a palpated reading.

Why the others are wrong

Move to a quieter area before auscultating a blood pressure: Relocating sounds reasonable, but this patient shows signs of poor perfusion and needs a blood pressure reading now to guide care; a validated field alternative exists and should be used immediately instead of moving the patient first.

Estimate blood pressure from the radial pulse's strength and rate, without a cuff: Pulse strength and rate can suggest perfusion is poor, but this is not the palpation method, which specifically uses the cuff to identify the actual systolic pressure at which the pulse returns, rather than a subjective impression of the pulse.

Estimate the systolic pressure using capillary refill time instead of a cuff: Capillary refill reflects peripheral perfusion, not a numeric systolic pressure, and it is not the recognized substitute for auscultation when Korotkoff sounds cannot be heard.

Question 10 of 10

An EMT is performing a focused history and physical exam on a patient with an isolated wrist injury after a fall. What is the appropriate scope of this exam?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · An exam focused on the wrist and the mechanism of injury

For a patient with an isolated injury and no significant mechanism of injury or altered mental status, the secondary assessment is a focused exam of the injured area and the history surrounding it, rather than a full head-to-toe exam reserved for patients with multi-system trauma.

Why the others are wrong

A full head-to-toe exam, since any trauma patient requires one: Incorrect. A full head-to-toe exam is reserved for patients with a significant mechanism of injury, an altered mental status, or multi-system trauma, not an isolated, non-significant injury with a clear mechanism.

A repeat of the primary assessment in its entirety: Incorrect. The primary assessment addresses immediate life threats and is not repeated as the secondary assessment; the secondary assessment is a distinct, focused step.

Vital signs only, with no physical exam of the injury: Incorrect. Vital signs alone skip the physical exam of the injured area, which is needed to assess for deformity, distal pulse, and sensation.

Find out which EMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free EMT diagnostic

More free EMT practice questions by topic