Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree EMT practice questions · Patient Treatment and Transport

10 free EMT practice questions: Head, Spinal & Nervous System Trauma

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A patient was rear-ended at low speed and self-extricated from the vehicle without difficulty. The patient is alert and oriented, denies any alcohol or drug use, and has no other painful injuries. On examination, there is no midline cervical or thoracic spine tenderness, and the patient has normal strength and sensation in all extremities. Which of the following is the most appropriate action regarding spinal motion restriction?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Withhold spinal motion restriction, since clearance criteria are met

The patient meets every item of the prehospital selective spinal motion restriction criteria at once: alert and oriented, no alcohol or drug use, no distracting painful injury, no midline cervical or thoracic tenderness, and normal strength and sensation in both arms and legs, following a mechanism too low-risk to override a clean exam. Physiologically, an intact neuro exam with no midline tenderness in a reliable patient rules out clinically significant unstable injury without imaging. That total clearance is what lets you withhold the collar and board, since immobilizing a patient who needs none only adds pressure injury, pain, and aspiration risk.

Why the others are wrong

Apply restriction, since any collision mechanism requires it: Applying restriction to any collision mechanism regardless of exam is the older mechanism-based standard EMTs trained under before selective criteria replaced it. This patient's full negative exam, no tenderness, no deficits, alert and sober, already answers what that mechanism concern is for, so mechanism alone can't override it. It treats a step contained inside the broader exam as a separate rule.

Apply a cervical collar for comfort only: A cervical collar for comfort fits a patient who reports neck pain and finds the support soothing. This patient has no neck complaint and no midline tenderness on exam, so there's no pain for the collar to relieve. It applies a device to a symptom the question says isn't present.

Withhold restriction only if neck range of motion is also pain-free: Testing pain-free neck range of motion is a real step in some clearance rules, like the Canadian C-Spine Rule. This patient meets every item of the prehospital criteria already: alert, sober, no distracting injury, no midline tenderness, normal strength and sensation. Requiring an extra step those criteria never contain keeps a cleared patient restricted for nothing.

Question 2 of 10

A 35-year-old patient struck in the face during an assault has significant bleeding from both nostrils. The patient is alert and oriented. Blood is trickling down the back of the throat. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate management?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Have the patient lean forward, pinch both nostrils, and monitor for airway patency

Two goals run at once with a nosebleed: stop the bleeding and keep it out of the airway. Pinching the soft part of the nose puts direct pressure on the anterior septum, where most nosebleeds originate, and leaning forward lets blood drain out the front instead of down the throat. The question already tells you blood is trickling down the back of the throat, which is exactly why airway monitoring is written into the answer: swallowed blood irritates the stomach and causes vomiting, and a patient vomiting blood with a face injury is the airway emergency you are trying to prevent. Facial trauma from an assault also earns ongoing attention for associated facial and head injury.

Why the others are wrong

Have the patient tilt the head back and apply pressure to the bridge of the nose: Head back with pressure on the bridge is the folk version of nosebleed care, and half of it is right: pressure is correct. Two things are wrong: the pressure belongs on the soft cartilage below the bony bridge, where the bleeding vessels actually are, and tilting the head back drains blood straight into the posterior pharynx. In a patient who already has blood running down his throat, that turns a controllable bleed into an airway problem.

Have the patient lie flat and apply ice to the forehead: Lying flat with ice fits a different injury: a facial contusion without active bleeding, where cold limits swelling. Supine is the worst position for an actively bleeding nose in an alert patient, because gravity now carries the blood toward the airway rather than out of it, and ice on the forehead addresses neither the bleeding site nor the aspiration risk.

Pack the nostrils tightly with gauze to stop the bleeding before transport: Nasal packing is real definitive care. It is what the ED does for bleeding that direct pressure will not control and for posterior bleeds. It is not an EMT skill, and packing a nose after a blow to the face risks forcing material where it does not belong if there is an underlying facial or skull fracture. Right treatment, wrong provider and wrong setting.

Question 3 of 10

A patient fell and struck the lower face. The patient now has swelling in the mandibular region and reports pain with swallowing and speaking. The patient's airway is currently patent. Saliva is draining slightly from the corner of the mouth. Which of the following is the most appropriate management to prevent airway compromise?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Manually support the jaw in a neutral position and monitor airway patency closely

Work the mandible backwards to the airway: the tongue is anchored to the jaw, so when the mandible is fractured and unstable, the structure that holds the tongue forward is gone and the tongue can fall back into the pharynx. That is the airway threat here, and it is why the pain with swallowing and speaking plus the saliva draining from the corner of the mouth matter. This patient is already having trouble managing their own secretions. Manual support holds the jaw in a neutral, anatomically correct position so the tongue stays forward and the airway stays open, and it leaves the mouth free so saliva and any blood drain out rather than pool. Just as important, it is instantly reversible: your hands come off in a second if the patient vomits or you need to suction, and the airway is patent right now, so continuous monitoring for a change is half the treatment.

Why the others are wrong

Immobilize the jaw with a tight circumferential bandage to prevent any movement: A circumferential bandage under the jaw and over the head is a real technique for supporting a fractured mandible in a fully alert patient with an intact airway and no active bleeding. Applied tightly in the field it becomes a hazard: it holds the mouth shut in a patient who is already drooling and finds swallowing painful, so if that patient vomits, common after facial trauma with swallowed blood. You have bound the airway closed and have to cut the bandage off before you can suction. Support the jaw with something you can remove instantly.

Position the patient upright and encourage speaking to ensure the airway is open: Sitting a facial-trauma patient upright is often good thinking, because it lets blood and saliva drain forward instead of down the throat. The error is the second half. Encouraging the patient to keep speaking makes a painful, unstable jaw move repeatedly, risks aspirating pooled secretions mid-sentence, and confirms nothing you cannot learn by watching the patient breathe. Assess the airway; do not exercise it.

Apply ice packs to reduce swelling, then transport without additional jaw support: Ice is a reasonable adjunct for facial swelling and would fit an isolated, stable jaw injury with no airway concern: a straightforward mandibular contusion. It fails here on two counts: it treats swelling over the next hour while the threat is instability over the next few minutes, and the option explicitly transports without jaw support, which means nothing at all is holding the tongue forward if this patient's mental status drops en route.

Question 4 of 10

An EMT is performing manual in-line stabilization on a patient with a suspected cervical spine injury. Which hand placement best prevents rotation and lateral movement of the head during stabilization?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Hands on either side of the head, fingers positioned to prevent rotation and lateral movement

The question specifies rotation and lateral movement, and that phrase points to the one placement that blocks motion in the coronal and transverse planes directly. Hands set on either side of the skull, over the ears, with fingers spread onto the mandible and occiput, act as a mechanical cage: any rotational or side-bending force meets resistance immediately at the temporal bones and jaw, before it can reach the cervical spine. This is stabilization, not traction, so no pulling force is applied. It matters because a second EMT can now work airway or immobilization equipment around a head that will not shift, keeping the neck in neutral alignment throughout.

Why the others are wrong

Hands placed under the patient's chin and supporting the jaw: This grip belongs to opening an airway with a jaw-thrust, the correct airway maneuver in suspected spinal injury. The question asks specifically about blocking rotation and lateral movement, and hands on the mandible alone cannot resist a turning force at the skull; pressure under the chin can also push soft tissue into the airway in facial trauma. Airway control and head stabilization are separate tasks.

Hands grasping the patient's shoulders while using the arms to immobilize the head: Squeezing the head between the forearms while gripping the shoulders is the bracing technique used during a standing takedown or seated rapid extrication, not a general answer to what stops rotation. The head can still rotate inside the forearms while the hands stay fixed on the shoulders, since the hold controls the torso, not the skull directly.

One hand on the forehead, one hand on the occiput, applying gentle traction: A hand on the forehead and one on the occiput controls flexion and extension, so this option can look right at first, but it leaves rotation and lateral bending unopposed, the motions this question asks about. Adding traction compounds it: axial pull can distract an unstable spine, and current teaching calls for neutral stabilization with no pulling force.

Question 5 of 10

During the log-roll of a trauma patient with a suspected spinal cord injury, the EMT assigned to the head maintains manual in-line stabilization while team members perform the roll. The patient suddenly vomits. What is the EMT's immediate priority?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Maintain in-line stabilization, coordinate a smooth roll to the recovery position, and suction as needed

The decisive finding is that the patient vomits while already mid-roll with manual in-line stabilization intact and the torso already turning as a unit. Physiologically, the roll itself is the airway solution: moving head and torso together to the recovery position lets gravity clear the oropharynx without any independent head rotation that would shear a possibly unstable cervical segment against the cord. This changes nothing about your sequence, it tells you to finish the roll you're already doing, keep the hold, and add suction, so you protect the airway and the spine in the same motion instead of treating them as competing problems.

Why the others are wrong

Stop the log-roll immediately and turn the patient's head to the side to allow vomit to drain: Turning the head to the side is the correct reflex for a supine patient who vomits and has no suspected spine injury, since gravity alone clears the mouth. Here the torso is being manually held in-line during an active roll, so rotating the head independently against that held torso is the exact motion in-line stabilization exists to prevent; the roll to the recovery position already achieves the same drainage without that risk.

Pause the roll, apply a cervical collar to secure the airway, and then resume movement: Applying a cervical collar is normal log-roll sequencing and belongs later in this same maneuver, but a collar limits flexion and extension only, it does not clear an airway or suction vomit. Stopping mid-roll to fasten one while the patient is actively vomiting delays the airway management the moment actually requires.

Call for paramedics to intubate the patient before continuing care: Advanced airway placement is correct once suctioning and positioning fail to protect the airway, but intubation is beyond EMT scope and paramedics aren't present yet. Waiting on another crew while vomit sits in the airway is not immediate care; suction and the roll already underway are the EMT's own tools right now.

Question 6 of 10

An EMT assesses a patient with head trauma and notes that the left pupil is noticeably larger than the right and responds more sluggishly to light, while the right pupil is normal. What is the most important implication of this finding for EMT care?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The patient may have elevated intracranial pressure or hemorrhage, warranting urgent transport

Unequal pupils (anisocoria) with one pupil dilated and sluggish to light in the setting of head trauma is a classic sign of elevated intracranial pressure or mass effect (hemorrhage, contusion, or edema). This is a critical finding requiring immediate notification of the receiving facility and expedited transport, even if other vital signs appear stable. This neurological finding indicates a time-sensitive, potentially life-threatening condition.

Why the others are wrong

The patient has a corneal abrasion that can be managed with a protective eye covering during routine transport: A corneal abrasion produces pain, tearing, and a foreign-body sensation; it does not dilate the pupil or slow its reaction to light. Attributing a new pupil asymmetry after head trauma to a surface eye injury misses the intracranial process the finding is warning about.

The pupil difference reflects physiologic anisocoria, which occurs naturally in a portion of the population: Physiologic anisocoria does occur in a portion of the healthy population, but it is not a call the field can make in a patient with acute head trauma: a newly unequal, sluggishly reactive pupil in this context must be treated as serious intracranial pathology until proven otherwise.

The patient needs serial pupil checks, with transport upgraded only if both pupils become fixed and dilated: Serial pupil checks are appropriate, but reserving the upgrade for bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils means waiting for a late sign of herniation. The unilateral change already present is the early warning, and it calls for expedited transport now, not a higher threshold for concern.

Question 7 of 10

A patient is transported with moderate blunt head trauma and worsening mental status. The EMT has ensured an open airway and adequate oxygenation. To help minimize additional increases in intracranial pressure during transport, which position is most appropriate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Supine with the head elevated approximately 30 degrees

The worsening mental status here signals rising intracranial pressure, and jugular venous outflow drops off once the head sits flat or lower. Elevating the head about 30 degrees keeps the internal jugular veins draining downhill without dropping cerebral perfusion pressure the way a head-down position would. This is the position you hold through transport once airway and oxygenation are secured, so you don't let ICP climb further on the way to definitive care.

Why the others are wrong

Flat on the stretcher with the head supported by a pillow: Flat positioning is what you'd default to for spinal immobilization concerns, but it removes the gravity assist on venous drainage, so the worsening mental status in this patient keeps climbing instead of stabilizing.

Trendelenburg position (head lower than feet) to maintain cerebral perfusion: Trendelenburg gets pulled in for shock states where you need blood returning to the core, but head-down here pools venous blood in the cranium and drives ICP up, the opposite of what a head injury with altered mental status needs.

Right lateral recumbent to improve venous drainage: Right lateral recumbent is the correct move for an unprotected airway at risk of aspiration, and this patient's airway is already secured, so that concern is handled; this position doesn't address the venous drainage problem the falling mental status is telling you about.

Question 8 of 10

What is a GCS, and what score indicates severe cognitive dysfunction?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The Glasgow Coma Scale measures a patient's level of consciousness across eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, and 8 or below is severe.

The Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS, scores a patient's level of consciousness across three findings: eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, added together for a total that runs from 3 to 15. A score of 8 or below means the patient has lost the ability to protect their own airway, since the brainstem reflexes that keep the airway clear start failing at that level. That 8-or-below line is why you hear "less than eight, intubate": once a patient drops into that range, the treatment priority shifts to airway control before anything else.

Why the others are wrong

The Glasgow Coma Score measures an infant's mental capacity across eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, and below 10 is severe.: This describes a pediatric-specific tool that grades mental capacity, but the GCS applies to any patient regardless of age and grades level of consciousness, not mental capacity; the severe cutoff is 8 or below, not below 10, and the tool is the Glasgow Coma Scale, not Score.

The Glasgow Coma Scale measures an infant's mental capacity across eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, and below 8 is severe.: This one gets the name right, Scale, and lands close to the true cutoff, but it still limits the tool to an infant's mental capacity instead of level of consciousness in any patient. It also draws the line at "below 8" rather than "8 or below," which would wrongly place a score of exactly 8 in the moderate range instead of severe.

The Glasgow Coma Score measures a patient's level of consciousness across eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, and 10 or below is severe.: This one keeps level of consciousness and the three components correct but drifts the cutoff to 10 or below, which actually spans the moderate range of 9 to 12; severe starts at 8 and counts down, and the tool's proper name is the Glasgow Coma Scale, not Score.

Question 9 of 10

The EMT is providing manual cervical spine stabilization for a trauma patient with a suspected cervical spine injury. The patient is lying supine on the ground. Which of the following best describes the correct hand position for manual cervical spine stabilization?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Place both hands on either side of the head, holding it in neutral alignment

Manual cervical spine stabilization is the first step in spinal motion restriction, performed as soon as spinal injury is suspected and held continuously until a collar and a device take over. A hand on each side of the head holds the head still in neutral alignment, holding, not squeezing, and not pulling, so the goal is that the head simply does not move relative to the torso. Symmetric hands on the sides of the skull are what make that possible: force applied evenly from both sides cancels out, so there is no direction for the head to be pushed, and no leverage applied to a spine that may be unstable.

Why the others are wrong

Place both hands on the sides of the head, pressing firmly against the face: Hands on the sides of the head is right. That half of the option describes the correct technique. The failure is in the second half, "pressing firmly against the face," because pressure across the face covers the mouth and nose and loads the mandible, which is the one structure you cannot afford to compromise in a patient whose airway you may need. The key beats it because C describes the same hand placement doing the correct job: holding the head still rather than compressing it.

Support the neck from underneath, lifting slightly to align the airway: Supporting the neck from underneath and lifting to align the airway is a real maneuver in the right patient, a medical patient with no suspected spinal injury, where repositioning the head to open the airway carries no spinal cost. This question states a suspected cervical spine injury, which makes lifting the neck the exact movement spinal motion restriction exists to prevent. The key beats it because neutral alignment already is an airway-open position, so C gets the airway without moving the spine.

Place one hand under the neck and one on the forehead: One hand under the neck and one on the forehead is the head-tilt/chin-lift family of positioning, correct for opening the airway of an unresponsive patient with no trauma. Here the patient is a trauma patient with a suspected cervical injury lying supine, and a hand under the neck both extends the head and creates a fulcrum the spine can pivot over. The key beats it because two hands on the sides of the head apply force symmetrically, which holds the spine still instead of levering it.

Question 10 of 10

The EMT is preparing to apply a cervical collar to an adult patient with suspected cervical spine injury. The patient is alert, cooperative, and maintaining a neutral head position with manual stabilization. Which of the following is the correct sequence for cervical collar application?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Maintain manual stabilization; place the chin piece, then the back

The patient already has manual stabilization holding a neutral head position, and that stabilization has to continue without interruption through the entire collar application. Manual in-line stabilization is what actually protects the cervical spine from movement of an unstable fracture segment; the collar itself only limits gross flexion and extension once fitted. Placing the chin piece first anchors the collar against the mandible, letting the back piece slide behind the neck without lifting or shifting the head. Stabilization stays in the EMT's hands until the patient is fully secured to a backboard or stretcher with head immobilization.

Why the others are wrong

Apply the collar, then establish manual stabilization afterward: The collar alone sounds like what stops spinal movement, so applying it fast would matter most. The patient already has manual stabilization holding neutral alignment, and releasing that before the collar is fully seated risks shifting an unstable fracture.

Apply the collar after the patient is secured to the stretcher: This matches the full sequence where the collar goes on before the log roll and the patient is strapped to a backboard or stretcher. Waiting until after that strapping to place the collar leaves an alert patient's neck unsupported during every move in between.

Release manual stabilization to place the collar, then resume it: The collar wraps around the neck, and it seems like the hands holding the head must come off to make room. That's backward: stabilization stays on the head the whole time, chin piece first, then the back piece slides in behind the neck, releasing only once the patient is secured to a board.

Find out which EMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free EMT diagnostic

More free EMT practice questions by topic