10 free EMT practice questions: Reassessment & Trending
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 10
While transporting an adult patient with abdominal pain, the EMT obtains the following findings. First reassessment at 5 minutes: blood pressure 132/86 mmHg, heart rate 96, respirations 16, skin warm and dry. Second reassessment at 15 minutes: blood pressure 124/80 mmHg, heart rate 108, respirations 20, skin pale and cool to the touch. What does this trending pattern most likely indicate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The patient may be compensating for shock; transport emergently with frequent reassessment
This patient may be in compensated shock. By the 15 minute check, the skin has turned pale and cool. The heart rate climbed from 96 to 108, and the breathing rate went from 16 to 20. The blood pressure only dropped a little, from 132/86 to 124/80. In compensated shock, the body tightens the blood vessels in the skin and speeds up the heart to hold the blood pressure up. The pale, cool skin and the rising heart rate come from that compensation, and the pressure still looks normal. Do not wait for the blood pressure to drop. Transport emergently and reassess every 5 minutes instead of every 15.
Why the others are wrong
The patient is stable; these are normal variations within acceptable vital sign ranges: Normal variation means the numbers shift a little and the patient looks the same. A heart rate of 108 is already tachycardia in an adult. This patient's skin also went from warm and dry to pale and cool between the two checks. Those changes point toward shock, not stability.
The patient is improving, as evidenced by the decrease in blood pressure: A lower blood pressure would point to improvement only if the heart rate, breathing, and skin got better too. Here the pressure dropped from 132/86 to 124/80 while everything else got worse. The heart rate rose from 96 to 108, the respirations rose from 16 to 20, and the skin turned pale and cool. A dropping pressure with a rising heart rate and pale, cool skin is the pattern of shock, not recovery.
The vital signs are within normal limits, so no change in transport priority is needed: A patient whose vital signs hold steady between checks can keep the same transport priority. This patient's vital signs did not hold steady. The heart rate rose to 108, which is tachycardia in an adult, and the skin went from warm and dry to pale and cool. Those changes raise the transport priority to emergent.
Question 2 of 10
A 62-year-old patient with asthma calls 911 reporting difficulty breathing. Initial assessment reveals a respiratory rate of 26 with visible retractions and accessory muscle use, the patient speaking only two words at a time, and pulse oximetry reading 88%. The EMT applies high-flow oxygen via NRB. At reassessment 5 minutes later, the respiratory rate is 22, retractions are less pronounced, the patient is now speaking in four-word phrases, and pulse oximetry reads 92%. What does this trending pattern most likely indicate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The patient is responding positively to oxygen therapy
This patient is responding to the oxygen. The pulse oximetry went from 88% to 92%, and the respiratory rate went from 26 to 22. The patient went from two words at a time to four-word phrases. The retractions are less pronounced. The NRB puts more oxygen into the lungs, even with the airways still tight from the asthma. The hemoglobin in the blood can then load more oxygen. Low oxygen was driving the patient to breathe fast. With more oxygen in the blood, the patient does not need to breathe as fast. That's why the rate dropped and the retractions eased. Keep the patient on high-flow oxygen, reassess again on the way, and do not slow down transport because the patient looks better.
Why the others are wrong
The patient's condition is worsening despite oxygen therapy: The retractions and accessory muscle use are still there. Any visible distress can look like the patient is getting worse. Every finding moved the other way. The respiratory rate fell from 26 to 22, the retractions eased, and the pulse oximetry rose from 88% to 92%. Those are all signs of improvement.
The patient is improving and transport can be safely delayed: An improving patient can look stable enough to stay on scene. The better speech and the 92% saturation show the oxygen is helping. The asthma attack itself is not over. The patient can get worse again once the NRB comes off, or the bronchospasm can worsen on its own. Transport is still the priority, no matter how well the patient responds to one treatment.
The initial vital signs were unreliable and should be disregarded: The first reading of 88% and the rate of 26 can look like bad numbers now that the patient is better. Both sets of vital signs are accurate. The second set is the same patient after 5 minutes of high-flow oxygen, not a correction of the first set.
Question 3 of 10
An EMT is providing positive pressure ventilations with a bag-mask device to an unresponsive 58-year-old patient at a rate of 1 breath every 6 seconds. The airway was suctioned clear during the primary assessment and no foreign body is visible. At the reassessment 2 minutes later the chest rises only slightly with each ventilation, the abdomen has become visibly distended, and the vital signs are BP 106/64 mmHg, P 118/min, and SpO₂ 88%, down from 94%. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Reposition the head and re-establish the mask seal
The ventilations are not working. The chest rises only slightly, the abdomen is getting distended, and the SpO₂ has dropped from 94% to 88%. Those findings tell you the air is going into the stomach instead of the lungs. Air goes into the stomach for two reasons. Either you are ventilating too hard or too fast, or the airway is blocked or out of position. Your rate is already 1 breath every 6 seconds. The airway was suctioned clear and there is no foreign body. That leaves the head position and the mask seal. Reposition the head, get a good mask seal again, and watch for chest rise with the next breath. Fix the head position and the seal before you change the rate or the force.
Why the others are wrong
Apply firm pressure over the abdomen to relieve the distention: Pressing on the abdomen pushes the air back out of the stomach. In an unresponsive patient with an unprotected airway, that pressure can make the patient vomit and aspirate. Pressing on the abdomen is a last resort only. Keep ventilating slowly and do not try to push the stomach contents out.
Increase the rate to 1 breath every 3 seconds: Faster breaths sound like the answer to a dropping SpO₂. The rate of 1 breath every 6 seconds is already right for an adult. The problem is that too little air reaches the lungs with each breath, not that there are too few breaths. Ventilating too fast is one of the two causes of air in the stomach. A faster rate makes the distention and the poor chest rise worse.
Squeeze the bag more forcefully with each ventilation: Squeezing harder sounds like the fix for poor chest rise. Forceful ventilation is the other cause of air in the stomach. Each breath should be slow and gentle, given over 1 second, with just enough air to make the chest rise. More force pushes more air into the stomach. A stomach full of air also limits how far the diaphragm can move.
Question 4 of 10
An EMT is reassessing a 24-year-old patient every 5 minutes after a fall from a roof. The first set of vital signs is BP 126/74 mmHg, P 92/min, and R 18/min. The second set is BP 124/86 mmHg, P 108/min, and R 18/min. The third set is BP 122/98 mmHg, P 124/min, and R 18/min. The patient is alert and has become increasingly restless, and the skin is now pale and cool. There is no head injury and no external bleeding. Which interpretation of this trend is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Compensated shock, because the pulse pressure is narrowing
This patient is in compensated shock. You see it by comparing the three sets, not by reading only the newest one. Across the three sets, the systolic pressure barely moves, from 126 to 122. Over the same time, the diastolic pressure climbs from 74 to 98. Pulse pressure is the difference between those two numbers, and this patient's pulse pressure narrows from 52 to 38 to 24. Meanwhile the pulse climbs from 92 to 124. The patient is more restless, and the skin is now pale and cool. A narrowing pulse pressure, a rising pulse, restlessness, and pale, cool skin are signs of compensated shock. The blood vessels are tightening to hold the blood pressure up. A fall from a roof can cause bleeding inside the body that you cannot see. With no head injury and no outside bleeding, nothing else explains these changes.
Why the others are wrong
An anxiety reaction, because the respiratory rate has not changed: Anxiety can make a patient restless, and the breathing rate here has not changed. Anxiety does not make the skin pale and cool, and anxiety does not push the pulse from 92 to 124 over ten minutes. Restlessness is also one of the earliest signs of compensated shock.
Rising intracranial pressure, because the pulse pressure is widening: A widening pulse pressure goes with rising pressure inside the skull. This patient's pulse pressure is going the other way, from 52 down to 24. Rising pressure in the skull also slows the pulse, and this pulse is climbing. The question says there is no head injury.
Stable perfusion, because the systolic pressure has held: A systolic pressure in the normal range can look like perfusion is holding. Blood pressure is often the last number to change in shock. The tightening blood vessels are what keep the systolic pressure up. The same tightening raises the diastolic pressure, narrows the pulse pressure, and makes the skin pale and cool.
Question 5 of 10
EMTs gave intranasal naloxone to a 27-year-old patient who was found unresponsive and breathing slowly after a suspected opioid overdose. Within 3 minutes the breathing became adequate and the patient answered questions. The secondary assessment found no signs of injury, and the patient has taken nothing since EMS arrival and has no history of chronic lung disease. Forty minutes into transport the patient is again difficult to arouse, the pupils are again pinpoint, and the vital signs are BP 112/70 mmHg, P 62/min, R 6/min and shallow, and SpO₂ 84% on high-flow oxygen. The BGL is 104 mg/dL. Which explanation for this change is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The naloxone is wearing off while the opioid is still active
The naloxone is wearing off while the opioid is still working. Naloxone does not last as long as many opioids. A patient who wakes up after the first dose can start breathing slowly again once the naloxone wears off. This patient answered questions within 3 minutes of the naloxone. Forty minutes later the patient is hard to wake again. The pupils are pinpoint again. Respirations are 6 a minute and shallow, and the saturation is 84% on high-flow oxygen. Those are the same opioid signs from the start of the call. The question rules out the other causes. The patient has taken nothing since you arrived and has no signs of injury. The blood glucose is 104, so low blood sugar is not the cause. Assist ventilations with a bag-valve mask and oxygen right away. Then give another dose of naloxone per protocol.
Why the others are wrong
The patient has settled into ordinary sleep after the reversal: Ordinary sleep after a reversal would mean a patient who is resting and still breathing well. Sleep does not drop the respirations to 6 a minute or the saturation to 84% on high-flow oxygen. Sleep does not bring back pinpoint pupils either. These are signs of the opioid slowing the breathing down again.
The high-flow oxygen has suppressed the respiratory drive: Oxygen shutting down the drive to breathe is the old hypoxic drive theory, and hypoxic drive is not real. This patient's saturation is 84% on high-flow oxygen, so this patient is not getting too much oxygen. The pinpoint pupils and the slow, shallow breathing are the opioid signs from the start of the call. Never lower the oxygen on a patient who is hypoxic. Assist ventilations with a bag-valve mask instead.
An unrecognized head injury from the collapse is now progressing: A head injury that is getting worse can lower the level of consciousness a second time. Rising pressure inside the skull raises the blood pressure and can make one pupil dilate. This patient's blood pressure is 112/70, and both pupils are pinpoint. The secondary assessment also found no signs of injury.
Question 6 of 10
An EMT is reassessing a 71-year-old patient being treated for hypovolemic shock after 2 days of vomiting and diarrhea. The patient is drowsy but answers questions, is receiving high-flow oxygen by NRB, and the breathing is unlabored with good chest rise. The skin is cool and mottled and the radial pulse is weak. The fingertip pulse oximeter read 96% on the first assessment and now displays an intermittent 79% while repeatedly losing the signal. The vital signs are BP 88/56 mmHg, P 124/min, and R 22/min. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Move the sensor to the earlobe and continue treating for shock
This patient is in hypovolemic shock, and the 79% on the pulse oximeter is not a real oxygen saturation. A pulse oximeter only works where there is enough blood flow for the sensor to pick up a pulse. This patient has cool, mottled skin, a weak radial pulse, and a blood pressure of 88/56. In shock, the blood vessels in the hands tighten down, and very little blood reaches the fingertips. The fingertip sensor can no longer read. That's why the number flickers and keeps losing the signal. Move the sensor to a more central spot, like the earlobe or the bridge of the nose. The pulse oximeter only adds to your assessment and does not replace it. Keep treating the shock you found on your assessment: the skin, the pulse, and the blood pressure.
Why the others are wrong
Begin positive pressure ventilations for the falling reading: Positive pressure ventilations are for a patient who is not breathing well enough. This patient's breathing is unlabored at 22 with good chest rise, and the patient is still answering questions. The low number is coming from poor blood flow to the finger. Bagging this patient for a bad reading also takes your attention away from the shock.
Record 79% as the oxygen saturation and continue transport: A reading belongs in the chart when the device has a steady signal. This reading flickers and keeps dropping out, so the device has not measured anything. Writing down 79% puts a false number into the trend you are building with each reassessment.
Replace the pulse oximeter with a different device before rechecking: Swapping devices makes sense when the equipment is broken. Here the problem is the patient. The sensor needs a pulse in the fingertip, and the shock has taken that pulse away. A second device on the same cold finger gives you the same bad reading, and the swap costs time.
Question 7 of 10
An EMT assisted a 47-year-old patient with a prescribed albuterol metered-dose inhaler for difficulty breathing and applied high-flow oxygen. On the first assessment the patient was sitting forward with accessory muscle use, speaking three words at a time, with R 28/min, P 104/min, and SpO₂ 89% on room air. At the reassessment 6 minutes later the patient is sitting back and speaking full sentences, the accessory muscle use has stopped, the chest rise is full, and the vital signs are R 20/min, P 126/min, and SpO₂ 96% on oxygen. Which interpretation of this reassessment is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Improving, because the work of breathing has decreased
This patient is improving, and the work of breathing proves the improvement. Before the albuterol, the patient sat forward, used accessory muscles, and spoke three words at a time. Now the patient sits back and speaks full sentences. The accessory muscle use has stopped and the chest rise is full. The SpO₂ went from 89% on room air to 96% on oxygen. You reassess an intervention to see whether it worked, and a treatment that worked shows up as a better patient. The respiratory rate dropped from 28 to 20 because the patient is breathing easier. In a patient who is tiring out, the rate drops along with the effort and the chest rise. The pulse went up because albuterol is an inhaled beta-agonist, and beta-agonists raise the heart rate. Keep watching the pulse, but the pulse is not the reason the patient is better.
Why the others are wrong
Improving, because the pulse rate has increased: The patient is improving, but the pulse is not what shows the improvement. The pulse went from 104 to 126 because albuterol can raise the heart rate and cause palpitations. A faster pulse is a side effect to note and watch, not proof the albuterol is working.
Worsening, because the pulse rate has increased: A rising pulse can mean a patient is getting worse. Everything else here is better. The patient speaks full sentences, the accessory muscle use has stopped, the chest rise is full, and the SpO₂ went from 89% to 96%. A pulse that climbs right after a bronchodilator comes from the medication, not from the patient getting worse.
Worsening, because the respiratory rate has decreased: A falling respiratory rate is a bad sign in a patient who is tiring out. In a tiring patient, the effort drops too, the chest rise gets shallower, and the mental status gets worse. This patient has full chest rise and went from three words to full sentences. The slower rate means less air hunger, not exhaustion.
Question 8 of 10
The EMT initially assessed an adult patient as stable and began reassessing every 15 minutes. At the next reassessment the patient has become confused and the skin is now pale and clammy. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Begin reassessing every 5 minutes because the patient is now unstable
This patient is now unstable. The patient was stable at first. Now the patient is confused, and the skin is pale and clammy. The confusion means less blood is reaching the brain. The pale, clammy skin means the sympathetic nervous system is narrowing the blood vessels in the skin and sending blood to the core. Both are signs of shock. How often you reassess depends on how the patient is doing now, not on the plan you made earlier. Reassess an unstable patient every 5 minutes. Checking every 5 minutes lets you catch changes in the vital signs and mental status before the patient gets worse.
Why the others are wrong
Perform one final reassessment and then discontinue further reassessment: Documenting the change does not end your reassessments. You never stop reassessing a patient who is getting worse in the middle of a call. Keep reassessing at shorter intervals until you hand the patient off to a higher level of care.
Continue reassessing every 15 minutes as originally planned: Every 15 minutes was the right plan while this patient was stable. This patient is not stable anymore. The new confusion and the pale, clammy skin mean you check every 5 minutes now.
Stop rechecking vital signs because the patient is deteriorating: Getting worse is the reason to keep checking vital signs, not a reason to stop. Trending the vital signs and mental status matters most when a patient is getting worse. The trends show you further decline and help you set the transport priority.
Question 9 of 10
An EMT is transporting a stable adult patient with no complaints of deterioration. At what interval should the EMT reassess this patient during transport?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Every 15 minutes during transport
A stable patient gets reassessed every 15 minutes during transport. This patient is stable with no complaints of getting worse, and still gets that 15 minute recheck. Regular rechecks let you catch a change early.
Why the others are wrong
Every 5 minutes during transport: Every 5 minutes is the interval for an unstable or critical patient. This patient is stable, so every 15 minutes is the right interval.
Once, at the start of transport: One check at the start of transport is not enough for any patient. Reassessment continues the whole way to the hospital, whether the patient is stable or not.
Only when a new symptom is reported: Some changes are things the patient cannot feel, like a blood pressure that is slowly dropping. Waiting for the patient to report a new symptom misses those changes. You recheck on a set interval instead.
Question 10 of 10
You are transporting a 33-year-old patient from a motor vehicle collision who has a possible spinal injury. All immediate life threats have been addressed, and the estimated time to the hospital is 20 minutes. What should you do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Reassess vital signs every 5 minutes
This patient is potentially unstable because of the possible spinal injury. A potentially unstable patient gets vital signs reassessed every 5 minutes. A spinal injury can get worse without much warning. The blood pressure can fall while the heart rate stays normal. The weakness or numbness can spread. Checking every 5 minutes lets you catch those changes while you still have time on the road to act on them. On a 20 minute ride, checking every 5 minutes gives you four sets of vital signs instead of one.
Why the others are wrong
Reassess vital signs every 15 minutes: Every 15 minutes is the reassessment interval for a stable patient. The life threats are handled, so this patient can look stable. The possible spinal injury still keeps this patient in the potentially unstable group, no matter how good they look right now.
Wait until arrival at the hospital to reassess vital signs: Waiting until the hospital leaves you with no vital signs for 20 minutes. A patient can get worse in 20 minutes. Vital signs from the scene tell the hospital how this patient was, not how this patient is now.
Reassess vital signs only if the patient reports new symptoms: Waiting for new symptoms lets the patient decide when you check. A patient with a spinal injury may not feel what is happening below the injury. A falling blood pressure is also not something the patient is going to tell you about.
Find out which EMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free EMT diagnosticMore free EMT practice questions by topic
Scene Size-up and Safety
Primary Assessment
Secondary Assessment
- Focused History (SAMPLE / OPQRST)
- Focused Physical Exam
- Reassessment & Trending
Patient Treatment and Transport
- Cardiovascular Emergencies & Cardiac Arrest
- Respiratory Emergencies & Airway Management
- Shock (All Types) & Hemorrhage Control
- Neurological & EENT Emergencies
- Endocrine Disorders
- Abdominal, GI, GU & Renal Disorders
- Hematologic, Immunologic & Infectious Disorders
- Psychiatric & Behavioral Emergencies
- Toxicology & Substance Use Emergencies
- Head, Spinal & Nervous System Trauma
- Chest, Abdominal & Multi-System Trauma
- Orthopedic, Soft-Tissue & Burn Trauma
- Obstetric, Neonatal & Gynecologic Emergencies
- Pediatric, Geriatric & Special Populations
- Medication Administration
- Environmental Emergencies