10 free EMT practice questions: Medication & Supply Inventory
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 10
During a supply check on a unit assigned to cover a summer day camp, an EMT finds that the only epinephrine auto-injectors carried are the 0.3 mg strength. What is the concern with this finding?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · A small child could not be given the correct dose of epinephrine
An auto-injector delivers a fixed dose, so the strengths carried decide which patients the unit can treat. The adult strength is 0.3 mg and the pediatric strength is 0.15 mg for a small child, and there is no way to divide an auto-injector. An assignment to a day camp makes pediatric anaphylaxis a foreseeable call, so stocking one strength leaves a predictable gap that has to be closed before the unit goes in service.
Why the others are wrong
Epinephrine auto-injectors expire sooner than other medications: Epinephrine auto-injectors don't expire sooner than other medications specifically: expiration is a general stocking concern, not the specific gap created by carrying only one strength.
The 0.3 mg strength may be given only by an advanced provider: The 0.3 mg strength isn't restricted to advanced providers: the concern here is about matching the dose to the patient's size, not about who's allowed to give it.
Two auto-injectors would be needed for every adult patient: Needing two auto-injectors for every adult patient isn't accurate: the 0.3 mg adult strength delivers the correct adult dose in a single device.
Question 2 of 10
During a daily supply check, an EMT finds that the ambulance carries nasal cannulas and BVMs but no NRBs. Which capability does the unit lack until the masks are restocked?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Delivery of high-concentration oxygen to an adequately breathing patient
Stock is only sufficient if it covers each capability the unit is expected to have. A nasal cannula runs at 1 to 6 L/min and delivers roughly 24 to 44%, while an NRB runs at 10 to 15 L/min and delivers roughly 60 to 90%. A BVM with a reservoir approaches 100% but is a ventilation device for a patient whose breathing is inadequate. With the NRBs gone, the unit can still give low-flow oxygen and can still ventilate, and only the high-concentration option for a patient who is breathing on their own is missing.
Why the others are wrong
Delivery of low-flow oxygen to an adequately breathing patient: still covered by the nasal cannula that's on the unit. That capability isn't affected by the missing NRBs.
Measurement of the oxygen saturation of an adequately breathing patient: Measurement of oxygen saturation doesn't depend on oxygen delivery devices at all. That's a separate piece of equipment, a pulse oximeter, unrelated to what masks are stocked.
Ventilation of a patient whose breathing is inadequate: still covered by the BVMs on the unit, which is a completely different device from the NRBs that are missing.
Question 3 of 10
During a shift check at a station that covers an elementary school, an EMT finds that the automated external defibrillator case contains adult pads only. What is the correct interpretation of this finding?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Pediatric pads should be stocked, but adult pads may be used if needed
Two rules apply at once here. Pediatric pads with a dose attenuator are preferred for a child under 8 years, so a unit covering an elementary school is not properly stocked without them and the set has to be obtained. At the same time, that preference is not a prohibition: when pediatric equipment is unavailable, defibrillation with adult pads may be lifesaving and is used rather than withheld. Reading either rule alone produces a wrong answer, and the readiness failure is corrected without ever becoming a reason to withhold a shock.
Why the others are wrong
Pediatric pads are unnecessary, because adult pads fit every patient: Saying pediatric pads are unnecessary because adult pads fit every patient ignores that pediatric pads with a dose attenuator are the preferred choice for a child under 8, even though adult pads can be used if nothing else is available.
The defibrillator may not be used on a child until pediatric pads arrive: Saying the defibrillator can't be used on a child until pediatric pads arrive is overly restrictive: adult pads may be used and can be lifesaving when pediatric equipment isn't available.
Pediatric pads are needed only for patients under 1 year of age: Saying pediatric pads are only needed for patients under 1 year of age understates the recommended age range, which extends to under 8 years.
Question 4 of 10
During the morning equipment check, the EMT discovers that the epinephrine auto-injectors expire in 4 weeks. What is the appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Document the expiration date and initiate replacement before they expire
Inventory management is about the truck being ready for the call you have not been dispatched to yet, not about whether the drug is legal to carry today. An expiration date is the manufacturer's guarantee of full potency, so the goal is that the date never arrives while the auto-injector is still on the unit. Four weeks is a working window: document the date so it is tracked rather than remembered, and start the replacement now so new stock arrives before the old stock lapses. The point of all of it is that there is in-date epinephrine on board for the anaphylaxis call in week five.
Why the others are wrong
Continue using them until they expire; replacement is not needed until after expiration: Using stock right up to its expiration date is exactly what you do when replacements are already in motion: the drug is fully potent until that date, and pulling it early just wastes it. What fails is the second half of the option, that replacement is not needed until after expiration. Waiting for the date to pass guarantees a window where the unit carries an expired auto-injector or none at all. The key beats it because it keeps using the current stock while starting the replacement now, so there is never a shift without in-date epinephrine.
Inspect them for visible changes and use them if they appear normal: Visual inspection is a real and required check. You look through the window for discoloration and particulate matter, and cloudy or brown epinephrine gets pulled regardless of its date. What inspection cannot do is verify potency, because a drug degrades chemically long before it changes appearance. The key beats it because dating and inspection are two independent checks, and this option uses one of them to override the other.
Discard them immediately and report the supply shortage to administration: Immediate removal is correct for a medication that is already expired, damaged, discolored, or recalled. That stock cannot stay on the unit another shift. These auto-injectors are in date for four more weeks and are the epinephrine this unit is carrying, so discarding them now creates the shortage rather than reporting one. The key beats it because it keeps a usable drug available while the replacement is arranged, and epinephrine is not a drug you can afford to be without.
Question 5 of 10
During the morning equipment check, an EMT notices that one of the aspirin bottles is open and has a faint smell of moisture. The tablets look slightly discolored compared to a new bottle. What is the most appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Remove the bottle from service immediately, document the issue, and ensure it is replaced with a new supply
An open bottle, a damp smell, and tablets discolored next to a fresh bottle are three findings pointing the same direction: this aspirin has taken on moisture and started to break down. Aspirin is acetylsalicylic acid, and water hydrolyzes it back toward salicylic acid and acetic acid, which is why moisture-damaged aspirin picks up a faint vinegar smell, and why the potency you would be counting on for a chest-pain patient is no longer the potency on the label. A medication you cannot vouch for is not a medication: pull the bottle out of service now, document what you found and when, and get it replaced so the next crew is not reaching for it in the middle of an ACS call.
Why the others are wrong
Recap the bottle, add a desiccant packet, and return it to service with a note to monitor: Desiccant and a tight cap are the right approach to preventing this problem. That is exactly why the packet and the cotton are in the bottle to begin with. Prevention does not work retroactively: once the tablets have absorbed water and begun to hydrolyze, drying the air around them cannot reverse the chemistry or restore lost potency. Returning it to service with a note to monitor also leaves a questionable drug on the truck, where the next person to grab it will not stop to read the note.
Use the tablets for patients who refuse liquid medication; discard them if the patient declines: Matching the medication form to what a patient will accept is real clinical reasoning: chewable versus swallowed, oral versus sublingual. It has nothing to do with whether the product itself is safe to give. Degraded medication is off-limits for every patient regardless of preference, and discarding it if the patient declines concedes the whole point: if it is not good enough to keep, it was never good enough to administer.
Assume the discoloration is from normal storage and use the bottle until the expiration date passes: Expiration dating is the usual trigger for pulling stock, and checking dates belongs to the same rig check that caught this. The printed date assumes the drug was stored as intended: sealed, dry, within its temperature range, and this bottle was not. Degradation from moisture can outrun the date by a wide margin, so what you can see in the tablets outranks what is printed on the label.
Question 6 of 10
During the morning equipment check, an EMT discovers that all epinephrine auto-injectors in the ambulance expired 3 weeks ago. The ambulance is the only unit currently available in the response area. The EMT's supervisor advises that the ambulance is needed in service immediately. What is the most appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Do not place the ambulance in service until the expired epinephrine is replaced with unexpired medication
Expired medications must never be carried on the ambulance or administered to patients under any circumstances, regardless of operational pressure or unit availability. Expired medications cannot be relied upon for effectiveness: their chemical composition may have changed, and may pose a safety risk. The EMT must never compromise medication safety to meet operational demands. The ambulance cannot be placed in service until all medications are current and within their expiration dates. This is a non-negotiable patient safety standard.
Why the others are wrong
Place the ambulance in service immediately with the expired epinephrine and replace it during the next scheduled equipment maintenance: Incorrect. Expired medications are not acceptable and cannot be deferred to later maintenance. They must be replaced immediately before any patient care is rendered.
Place the ambulance in service with expired epinephrine but notify dispatch that this unit cannot respond to anaphylaxis calls: Incorrect. Restricting certain response types does not solve the core problem: expired medications must not be carried on the ambulance at all.
Contact medical control to request permission to carry and administer expired epinephrine in life-threatening emergencies: Incorrect. Medical control would not authorize the use of expired medications. Medication expiration is a safety requirement, not a clinical decision that can be delegated or approved as an exception.
Question 7 of 10
While restocking at the station, an EMT carries a full spare oxygen cylinder to the ambulance and finds that the fixed housing that holds the spare has broken loose from the wall and is awaiting repair. No other bracket or commercially manufactured securing device is available on the unit. The unit is due back in service. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Leave the spare at the station and report the broken housing
This item sets a real supply obligation against a safety rule and the safety rule wins. The unit is expected to carry a spare portable cylinder, so leaving it behind creates a genuine gap, which is what makes the improvised restraints tempting. Portable oxygen tanks are secured by fixed clasps or housings regardless of where they are carried, and securing a tank to the stretcher or bench is permitted only with a commercially manufactured device designed for that purpose, which this unit does not have. An unsecured cylinder is not a lesser version of a secured one; it is a projectile in a collision and its valve-gauge assembly can be damaged in a fall. With no compliant way to secure it, the correct move is the one the shift-check process is built for: leave the cylinder at the station and report the broken housing on the written checklist so the deficiency is documented and repaired, rather than carrying the cylinder in a way no standard permits.
Why the others are wrong
Strap the cylinder to the stretcher frame with the patient straps: This is the misconception that any strong strap will hold a cylinder. Securing a tank to the stretcher or bench is specifically excluded unless a commercially manufactured device designed for that purpose is used, and the question states no such device is on the unit. The patient straps are made to hold a patient on the stretcher, and the stretcher itself moves in and out of the ambulance.
Lay the cylinder on the floor behind the airway seat, out of the walkway: This is the misconception that low and out of the way is the same as secured. Keeping the cylinder out of the walkway addresses tripping, not the hazard that governs here: an unsecured tank becomes a projectile in a collision regardless of where in the compartment it started.
Stow the cylinder in the outside compartment with the extrication tools: This is the misconception that moving the cylinder outside the patient compartment removes the risk to the crew. The requirement to secure tanks by fixed clasps or housings applies regardless of where they are carried, and an unsecured cylinder among loose extrication tools is also exposed to damage to its valve-gauge assembly.
Question 8 of 10
An EMT is checking the spare portable oxygen cylinders carried on the ambulance. One aluminum cylinder is labeled for medical oxygen, its plastic valve seal was intact until the EMT removed it, and the regulator gauge reads 2,000 psi once the regulator is attached. The month and year stamped into the collar show that the cylinder was last tested 6 years ago. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Remove it from service and report it for retesting
Three separate facts are given about this cylinder and they check different things. The medical oxygen label confirms the contents, the intact plastic valve seal confirms it has not been opened since it was filled, and the gauge confirms how much oxygen is inside. None of those addresses the letters and numbers stamped into the collar, where the month and year record when the cylinder was last tested. Aluminum cylinders are generally tested every 5 years and composite cylinders every 3 years, so a cylinder last tested 6 years ago is overdue under either interval and its condition is no longer established, whatever the gauge reads. The cylinder comes off the unit and goes back for testing, and the shortfall is reported on the written checklist so a replacement is obtained before the unit is placed in service.
Why the others are wrong
Place it in service, since the gauge reads full: This is the misconception that a full gauge is the whole readiness check for a cylinder. Pressure describes how much oxygen is inside; the collar stamp describes when the cylinder itself was last tested, and those are separate questions. A cylinder can read 2,000 psi and still be overdue for the test that establishes it is safe to hold that pressure.
Crack the valve to confirm it holds pressure: This is the misconception that a field pressure check substitutes for the periodic test. Cracking the valve is a step for clearing debris from the opening before the regulator is attached, and holding pressure for a few seconds on the station floor is not the test that the collar stamp records.
Keep it as the backup and use the newer one: This is the misconception that an overdue cylinder is acceptable as long as it is not the first one reached for. The backup cylinder is the one carried for the second patient or the long transport, so demoting it to backup does not take it out of use; it just delays the moment it is relied on.
Question 9 of 10
An EMT is restocking the ambulance after a 90-minute transfer between two hospitals during which the mounted oxygen system was used with a disposable humidifier. The humidifier bottle still holds most of its sterile water and shows no visible contamination. The next call may be another long transport. Which action is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Discard the humidifier and fit a new single-use bottle
Two different rules apply to a humidifier and they answer different questions. The first decides whether to use one: humidification is considered for runs lasting longer than 1 hour and is not usually necessary on shorter runs, which is why the bottle was in the circuit on a 90-minute transfer. The second decides what happens to it afterward: humidification equipment is disposable and should be used only on a single patient to prevent the spread of infection. The remaining water and the absence of visible contamination speak to neither rule, because the concern is the organisms a used bottle can carry rather than how it looks or how full it is. The bottle is therefore discarded during restocking and a new single-use humidifier is fitted, so the unit is ready if the next call is again long enough to warrant humidification.
Why the others are wrong
Top off the sterile water and leave it in place: This is the misconception that the water is the consumable and the bottle is the equipment. Humidification equipment is disposable and is used on one patient only; refilling it keeps the same used bottle in the oxygen path for the next patient, which is the transmission route the single-patient rule exists to close.
Empty and air-dry the bottle before the next patient: This is the misconception that drying a disposable item makes it reusable. Emptying and air-drying is a reasonable instinct drawn from reusable equipment, but a single-use humidifier is not returned to service by any cleaning step short of replacement, and the question states it has already been used on a patient.
Keep the bottle for the next transport over 1 hour: This is the misconception that reuse is acceptable so long as the next run also meets the threshold that justified humidification. The 1-hour figure decides whether a humidifier is used at all, not how many patients one bottle may serve; a second long transport is a second patient.
Question 10 of 10
During a shift check, an EMT finds that the cervical collars stocked on the ambulance are all one size. What is the concern with this finding?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · A single size cannot properly fit every patient who may need one
Keeping equipment in working order and adequately stocked includes having the range of sizes a piece of equipment requires to be used correctly. A single cervical collar size cannot properly fit every patient, so an ambulance stocked with only one size is not equipped to perform spinal motion restriction correctly across the range of patients it may encounter.
Why the others are wrong
There is no concern, since one size fits all adult patients: Saying there's no concern because one size fits all adult patients is incorrect: patients vary in neck size and a single collar size can't properly fit every one of them.
Cervical collars are not required equipment on an ambulance: Saying cervical collars aren't required equipment misstates their role. They're a standard part of spinal motion restriction equipment that should be available in appropriate sizes.
The concern only applies if a pediatric patient is anticipated: Saying the concern only applies if a pediatric patient is anticipated understates the problem, even among adult patients, a single collar size can't fit the full range of neck sizes encountered.
Find out which EMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free EMT diagnosticMore free EMT practice questions by topic
Scene Size-up and Safety
Primary Assessment
Secondary Assessment
Patient Treatment and Transport
- Cardiovascular Emergencies & Cardiac Arrest
- Respiratory Emergencies & Airway Management
- Shock (All Types) & Hemorrhage Control
- Neurological & EENT Emergencies
- Endocrine Disorders
- Abdominal, GI, GU & Renal Disorders
- Hematologic, Immunologic & Infectious Disorders
- Psychiatric & Behavioral Emergencies
- Toxicology & Substance Use Emergencies
- Head, Spinal & Nervous System Trauma
- Chest, Abdominal & Multi-System Trauma
- Orthopedic, Soft-Tissue & Burn Trauma
- Obstetric, Neonatal & Gynecologic Emergencies
- Pediatric, Geriatric & Special Populations
- Medication Administration
- Environmental Emergencies
Operations
- Equipment Readiness & Ambulance Check
- Medication & Supply Inventory
- Documentation (PCR)
- Responder Wellness & Stress Management