Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree EMT practice questions · Scene Size-up and Safety

10 free EMT practice questions: Requesting Additional Resources

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

An EMT responds to a third-floor apartment with no elevator for a 61-year-old patient who fell and cannot get up. The patient is alert, reports hip pain, and weighs about 400 pounds (180 kilograms). The stairway is narrow and turns sharply at each landing. Only the two-person crew is on scene. What should the EMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Request additional personnel to assist with the move

Personnel are a resource, and recognizing that a scene needs more of them is part of the size-up. A 400-pound (180-kilogram) patient carried down a narrow stairway that turns at every landing exceeds what two providers can control, and the consequences of trying are a dropped patient and injured providers. The request is made before the move starts, because once a crew has committed to a carry there is no safe way to stop partway down. Recognizing the limits of the crew on scene is a resource decision, not a strength problem.

Why the others are wrong

Ask family members to help carry the patient down: Asking family members to help carry the patient brings untrained people into a physically demanding move on a narrow, sharply turning stairway, risking injury to them and the patient.

Have the patient walk down the stairs with assistance: Having the patient walk down with assistance isn't appropriate for a patient reporting hip pain from a fall, walking risks worsening a possible hip injury.

Move the patient down the stairway on a stair chair: Moving the patient down on a stair chair without adequate personnel repeats the same problem: two providers still can't safely control a 400-pound patient on this stairway alone.

Question 2 of 10

A rural EMS service operates two ambulances, and both are on scene at a community hall where a roof section collapsed. Initial triage identifies two immediate, three delayed, and three minor patients. The nearest hospital is 25 minutes away. What should the EMT request?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Mutual aid from neighboring EMS agencies

A multiple-patient incident is defined by the gap between the patients present and the resources available, not by a headcount: the same eight patients would be routine for a large urban system and overwhelming for a two-ambulance service. Here both of the agency's ambulances are already committed, each round trip to the hospital costs roughly 50 minutes, and two immediate patients cannot wait for a unit to come back. The only place additional transport capability can come from is outside the agency, which is what mutual aid agreements exist to provide, and the request is made now rather than after the local system has already failed.

Why the others are wrong

Additional units from the same EMS service: Requesting additional units from the same EMS service doesn't help when both of the service's ambulances are already committed on scene. There's nothing more to draw from internally.

A supervisor to respond to the scene: Requesting a supervisor to respond to the scene doesn't add any additional transport capability, which is what this scene actually needs given two immediate patients and both local units already tied up.

Law enforcement to assist with moving patients: Requesting law enforcement to assist with moving patients doesn't solve the transport gap: the problem is a shortage of ambulances and definitive care capacity, not a shortage of hands to move people.

Question 3 of 10

Dispatch sends three ambulances to a reported collision involving a passenger van on a city street. The EMT arrives first, finds one patient with a small forearm laceration, and confirms with the drivers and witnesses that no one else was in either vehicle. What should the EMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Cancel the additional ambulances through dispatch

Requesting resources and releasing them are the same job task viewed from both ends: the size-up sets the resource level, and once the size-up shows one patient with a minor injury, the extra units are no longer part of that level. Every ambulance held at this scene is an ambulance not available for the next call, and the units are still responding, which carries its own crash risk. The EMT who completed the size-up is the one with the information, so the release goes back through dispatch immediately. Resources can always be requested again if the picture changes.

Why the others are wrong

Stage the additional ambulances nearby: Staging the additional ambulances nearby keeps them tied up and unavailable for other calls even though the size-up has already shown they aren't needed for this scene.

Have the additional ambulances search the area: Having the additional ambulances search the area isn't warranted once witnesses and drivers have confirmed no one else was in either vehicle. There's no indication of a missing patient here.

Assign the additional ambulances to traffic control: Assigning the additional ambulances to traffic control uses resources meant for patient care on a task that isn't what they were dispatched for, when the correct move is simply releasing them back into service.

Question 4 of 10

An EMT crew from a basic life support service is transporting a 38-year-old patient whose generalized seizure has continued without stopping for 9 minutes. The airway is being managed with suction and positioning, and oxygen is being given. The hospital is 30 minutes away. Which additional resource should the EMT request?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · An advanced life support intercept

A seizure lasting 9 minutes without stopping is status epilepticus, defined as continuous seizure activity beyond 5 minutes. At that point ongoing neuronal firing outstrips the brain's oxygen and glucose supply, risking permanent injury, and the only way to break the seizure is a benzodiazepine such as midazolam, diazepam, or lorazepam, none of which sit in the EMT scope. That makes this a resource problem: keep managing the airway with suction, positioning, and oxygen, and request an advanced life support intercept, which can meet the moving ambulance en route and add the missing drug without slowing transport toward the 30-minute hospital.

Why the others are wrong

A second basic life support ambulance: A second BLS unit adds more hands for airway suctioning or moving the patient, useful when staffing is short. Neither BLS ambulance carries a benzodiazepine, so a second one still can't stop a seizure that has run 9 minutes straight; the missing capability is pharmacological, not personnel.

Law enforcement for an emergency escort: Law enforcement escorts cut transport time through traffic or crowds, which matters when minutes to definitive care are critical. This seizure won't stop from arriving faster; at 9 minutes it needs a benzodiazepine now, something an escort can't supply, so it doesn't address what the patient needs.

Air medical transport to the hospital: Air medical transport earns its call when ground transport is long or terrain blocks a ground unit, cutting overall time to definitive care. Here the hospital is only 30 minutes out by ground, and a helicopter takes longer to launch and land than a ground ALS unit meeting the ambulance already en route.

Question 5 of 10

The EMT responds to a call for an injured patient at a residence. The patient's husband is present, appears angry, and is demanding that the EMT not touch the patient. The scene is quiet, no weapons are visible, but the patient has bruising on the arms and neck. What is the EMT's best initial action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Request police to stage at the scene before approaching the patient

The husband's demand that you not touch the patient, combined with bruising on the arms and neck, is the pattern for suspected domestic violence: an unpredictable, potentially volatile person controlling access to a patient with injuries consistent with assault. Scene safety comes before patient care, and a scene isn't safe just because no weapon is visible; a hostile bystander can become violent without warning. Stage and wait for police before you or your partner make contact, so the scene gets secured before anyone approaches the patient.

Why the others are wrong

Enter the scene, perform your assessment, and notify police afterward if abuse is suspected: This is the sequence that follows from treating "assess and treat first, report suspected abuse later" as always correct, since that is the rule once a scene is secured. Here the husband is actively hostile and demanding no contact, so the scene isn't secured yet; entering anyway skips the safety step that has to come first.

Leave the scene immediately and call for fire department backup: Fire department backup is the right call for extrication, hazmat, or extra hands, not for an unsecured scene with a hostile person; leaving without requesting the correct resource, police, abandons the patient instead of solving the safety problem.

Approach the patient directly while documenting the husband's behavior for the police report: Documenting the husband's behavior for police is useful information, but walking up to the patient while he is actively angry and telling you not to touch her ignores the immediate threat his behavior represents and puts you in reach before the scene is controlled.

Question 6 of 10

The EMT is dispatched to a motor-vehicle collision with multiple patients on a busy highway. The EMT's initial scene size-up reveals four patients with varying degrees of injury, and traffic is still moving past the scene at highway speeds. What should the EMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Request additional ambulances, establish scene safety with hazard control, then begin triage

The finding that decides this is traffic still moving at highway speeds past four patients. An unsecured lane means the scene itself is still producing casualties: EMTs and patients are exposed to being struck while care is attempted. Physiologically, treating anyone before the hazard is controlled risks converting a rescuer or a walking patient into a second trauma victim, and one crew cannot manage four patients' airways and hemorrhages simultaneously anyway. The sequence has to run: call for enough ambulances to match the patient count, get hazard control (cones, blocking apparatus, law enforcement) between traffic and the scene, then triage to sort who needs the first unit's hands.

Why the others are wrong

Begin treatment of the most critically injured patient while waiting for additional units: This fits a single-patient call where you go straight to treatment, but here you have four patients and a live traffic lane, so one EMT locked onto the sickest patient leaves three others unassessed and the scene hazard unaddressed.

Wait for fire department to arrive before treating any patients: Fire is genuinely needed for extrication or hazmat, but requesting more ambulances, controlling traffic, and starting triage do not require fire on scene first; you don't freeze all action waiting on one resource.

Transport the first patient immediately to reduce the number of patients at the scene: Moving one patient before triage is done treats the symptom of scene congestion, not the cause, and abandons the other three patients along with any coordinated sorting of who's worst.

Question 7 of 10

The EMT responds to a motor-vehicle collision on a steep hillside where one vehicle has left the road and is perched on the edge of a 40-foot ravine, partially off the embankment. The patient appears conscious and alert but is unable to safely exit the vehicle. What is the EMT's best course of action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Request technical rescue/rope rescue team, establish scene safety, and stage at a safe location uphill

The vehicle is perched on the edge of a 40-foot ravine, partially off the embankment, and that instability is the deciding finding. Any added weight, whether a rescuer's foot on the frame or a rope pulling from the road, shifts the load and can send the vehicle over with the patient still inside. Because the patient is conscious and alert, you have time to work the call correctly instead of fast: request a technical rescue/rope rescue team, establish scene safety, and stage uphill in a safe position until they arrive.

Why the others are wrong

Rappel down to the vehicle using climbing gear from the ambulance to reach the patient: Rappelling to a patient is technique for a trained rope rescue tech with rated rope, anchors, and a belay, not ambulance gear. The rig carries none of that, and stepping onto the slope above a vehicle perched at the edge of a 40-foot ravine adds weight that can tip it over.

Use the ambulance winch to pull the vehicle back onto the road while the patient remains inside: Winching a vehicle back onto stable ground is legitimate recovery work for a tow operator or rescue rig with a rated line. An ambulance has no winch, and pulling on a vehicle already partway off the embankment can just as easily drag it over the 40-foot ravine with the patient belted inside.

Coach the patient to carefully exit the vehicle and climb back up the hillside while you stabilize with hand holds: Coaching a patient to self-extricate is the right move when they can move under their own power and the ground is stable. Here the patient is stated as unable to safely exit, and the only way out is a steep hillside above a 40-foot ravine, where an injured patient climbing, or you bracing with only hand holds, can both go over the edge.

Question 8 of 10

The EMT is called to a residence where a strong smell of natural gas is found inside the home and a patient is complaining of headache and nausea. No one reports a gas leak, but the odor is unmistakable. What should the EMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Do not enter the home; evacuate all occupants, stage outside, and request the gas utility company and fire department

The unmistakable gas odor combined with a patient already showing headache and nausea tells you the concentration inside is high enough to be both toxic and potentially explosive. Natural gas displaces oxygen and depresses the central nervous system, producing those symptoms as an early sign of hypoxia, while any spark, from a light switch to your radio, can ignite an accumulated gas-air mixture. That risk means you stay outside, evacuate every occupant to a safe staging area, and let the gas utility company and fire department handle the atmosphere before any assessment or entry happens.

Why the others are wrong

Enter the home quickly, perform a rapid assessment, and move the patient outside for immediate transport: Headache and nausea suggest gas exposure is already harming the patient, making a quick grab feel protective, but the unconfirmed, unmistakable odor means the air could be near an explosive gas-air mixture, and entering before the fire department confirms it is safe puts you and the patient at risk. Scene safety always precedes patient contact.

Advise the occupants to open the windows for ventilation and stay on scene to monitor for worsening symptoms: Opening windows to ventilate makes sense for a mild odor that's dissipating, but this scene describes a strong, unmistakable smell with a symptomatic patient, meaning the leak is active and heavy. Staying on scene to monitor still exposes everyone to explosion risk and worsening exposure.

Enter the home to locate the source of the leak and shut off the supply valve to stop the flow of gas: Shutting off the supply valve does stop the source once located, but that task belongs to trained utility or fire personnel, not the EMT crew described here. Entering the home to search for a valve risks generating a spark that ignites the accumulated gas.

Question 9 of 10

An EMT responds to a call at a residential address and finds a 32-year-old patient sitting in the front yard with a laceration to the forehead. The patient states, 'I fell,' but the injury pattern suggests blunt force trauma. Shouting and the sound of breaking glass are coming from inside the house. What is the EMT's immediate priority?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Stage at a safe distance, notify dispatch of the scene hazard, and request police to secure the scene before providing care

The finding that decides this is the shouting and breaking glass coming from inside the house, an active, unresolved hazard on scene, not just the laceration itself. That sound tells you the threat is still in progress and its source and number of persons involved are unknown, so approaching the patient means walking into an uncontrolled danger zone. EMT safety takes priority over patient contact when a scene is not secure. The correct move is to stage at a safe distance, notify dispatch of the hazard, and request police response so law enforcement secures the house before anyone provides care.

Why the others are wrong

Enter the house to assess the full scene and determine if other patients require assistance: Entering the house to check for other patients is the right instinct when you suspect additional victims, but the shouting and glass breaking mean the scene is still active and unsecured, and EMTs are not equipped or trained to intervene in ongoing violence.

Quickly assess and transport the patient to the hospital before the situation inside escalates further: Rapid assessment and transport looks appealing as a way to get the patient clear before things get worse, but it still requires approaching and treating the patient in the yard while the hazard inside remains unresolved, putting both of you at risk before the scene is confirmed safe.

Provide full assessment and treatment from inside the ambulance while monitoring the house until police arrive: Watching the house from the ambulance while treating the patient seems like a safety compromise, since it keeps the EMT off the property, but the patient is still in the yard within reach of whoever is inside, so this approaches and treats before police have actually secured the scene rather than truly staging clear of it.

Question 10 of 10

The EMT responds to a report of a possible drowning at a public beach. Upon arrival, the EMT finds bystanders pointing to an area approximately 150 feet offshore where a swimmer went underwater 20 minutes ago and has not resurfaced. The water is rough with a strong current, and the bottom is not visible from shore. Coast Guard rescue boat is approximately 30 minutes away. What is the EMT's immediate action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Request Coast Guard water rescue while establishing scene safety and preparing rescue equipment

This is an open-water drowning with a patient submerged offshore. The EMT must immediately request water rescue resources (Coast Guard in this case). EMTs without water rescue certification must NOT enter deep water or rough conditions, as this creates a second victim and compromises the original rescue. The EMT should establish scene safety, prepare rescue breathing equipment, and be ready to provide care once the patient is retrieved by rescue personnel.

Why the others are wrong

Wade or swim out into the water to search for and retrieve the patient: EMTs without water rescue certification should not enter deep water or rough water; this endangers the provider and does not improve outcomes.

Instruct bystanders to throw flotation devices into the water and hope the patient grabs one: While throwing flotation devices may provide some benefit if the patient surfaces, this does not address a submerged drowning victim.

Wait for the Coast Guard since you are not trained for water rescue: The EMT should immediately request water rescue resources rather than delaying the response.

Find out which EMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free EMT diagnostic

More free EMT practice questions by topic