Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree EMT practice questions · Patient Treatment and Transport

10 free EMT practice questions: Toxicology & Substance Use Emergencies

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A 46-year-old patient with a known history of heavy daily alcohol use is brought to the EMT by a roommate, who reports the patient's last drink was approximately 40 hours ago after running out of money. The patient is anxious, trembling, and reports seeing insects crawling on the walls that are not there. The skin is diaphoretic, and the vital signs are BP 168/98 mmHg, P 118/min, and R 22/min. There is no odor of alcohol on the breath. Which of the following is the most appropriate recognition of this presentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Alcohol withdrawal syndrome needing prompt transport

The patient is 40 hours out from the last drink, tremulous, diaphoretic, tachycardic at 118, hypertensive at 168/98, and hallucinating without any clouding of consciousness or global confusion. Chronic alcohol use downregulates GABA receptors and upregulates NMDA receptors; removing the depressant leaves that excitatory drive unchecked, producing the autonomic surge and alcoholic hallucinosis you see here. Because this can progress to withdrawal seizures or delirium tremens, your job is prompt transport and continuous monitoring rather than waiting to see if it worsens.

Why the others are wrong

Acute alcohol intoxication with a declining level of consciousness: Heavy daily alcohol use makes intoxication the reflex pick, but the last drink was about 40 hours ago with no alcohol odor on the breath, so the blood alcohol has already cleared and this is withdrawal, not intoxication.

Wernicke encephalopathy from chronic thiamine deficiency: Chronic drinkers do face real risk for Wernicke encephalopathy from thiamine deficiency, but that condition presents with confusion, ataxic gait, and abnormal eye movements like nystagmus, none of which appear here.

Delirium tremens, which begins within 6 hours of the last drink: Delirium tremens shares the tremor, tachycardia, hypertension, and diaphoresis seen here, so it's an easy reach. It requires disorientation and severe global confusion on top of the autonomic storm, and it classically begins 48 to 96 hours after the last drink. At 40 hours out, oriented enough to describe the hallucination, this is withdrawal with hallucinosis, not delirium tremens yet.

Question 2 of 10

Local protocol authorizes EMTs to administer activated charcoal for certain ingestions under online medical direction. A 19-year-old patient reports swallowing a large quantity of an over-the-counter pain reliever approximately 20 minutes ago. The patient was initially alert but has become drowsy and now responds only to loud verbal stimuli, with slurred speech. Which of the following is the most appropriate reason to withhold activated charcoal in this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The decreasing level of consciousness creates a significant aspiration risk

The finding that decides this is the change from alert to responding only to loud verbal stimuli with slurred speech: this patient's level of consciousness is actively falling, not just low. As mental status drops, the cough and gag reflexes that keep the airway clear weaken along with it, so vomiting or an inability to swallow can send charcoal straight into the lungs, where it causes severe chemical pneumonitis. Airway protection has to come before decontamination, so you withhold charcoal here and manage the airway and transport instead. Anything that threatens a patient's ability to protect their own airway rules out an oral agent, regardless of what was ingested.

Why the others are wrong

The ingestion occurred too recently for charcoal to be effective: Timing does matter for charcoal, but the direction is backwards here: with the ingestion only about 20 minutes old, most of the drug is likely still in the stomach, which is exactly when charcoal works best. This reasoning would fit an ingestion many hours old, not this one.

The patient took an over-the-counter rather than a prescription medication: Whether a drug is over the counter or prescription tells you nothing about whether charcoal binds it; that depends on the substance itself, and OTC pain relievers are commonly appropriate for charcoal. This sorts by where the drug was purchased instead of by a clinical variable, and it ignores the mental status change entirely.

Activated charcoal is only effective for ingested corrosive substances: Corrosive or caustic ingestions are a real, classic contraindication to charcoal, since charcoal binds them poorly and obscures the endoscopy view they need, so this option has the rule exactly backwards by calling corrosives the one thing charcoal treats. It also does not describe this patient, who swallowed an over-the-counter pain reliever, not a corrosive.

Question 3 of 10

A 27-year-old patient is found unresponsive with respirations of 4/min and pinpoint pupils, consistent with a suspected opioid overdose. The EMT begins positive pressure ventilations. The patient's nose is actively bleeding from a facial injury sustained in a fall, making the nasal mucosa unsuitable for medication delivery. Which of the following is the most appropriate action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Continue positive pressure ventilations and request ALS

Ventilation is the treatment here, not naloxone. Opioids kill by shutting down the drive to breathe, so the positive pressure ventilations you already started are what is keeping this patient alive, and they go on working whether or not any reversal agent ever reaches the patient. Intranasal delivery works because the nasal mucosa is thin and richly vascular, and active bleeding both washes the dose away and blocks the mucosal contact the route depends on, so that door is closed here. At the EMT level, epinephrine is the only medication you give intramuscularly, so there is no second route sitting in your bag for naloxone. That leaves the answer as the thing you can actually do: keep ventilating, and get ALS moving, because a paramedic can give naloxone by routes you cannot. None of that waits on the nosebleed.

Why the others are wrong

Administer naloxone by the intramuscular route: Intramuscular naloxone is a real route, and the paramedic meeting you will likely use it. It is not yours to give. At the EMT level epinephrine is the only medication you administer intramuscularly, so drawing up IM naloxone puts you outside your scope on a patient who is already being ventilated adequately. The key gets the same drug to the patient by calling the person licensed to give it, and keeps you doing the intervention that is already working.

Place naloxone under the tongue to be absorbed through the oral mucosa: Sublingual is a real route, and nitroglycerin is the one you know, because that drug is formulated to absorb through oral mucosa. Naloxone is not manufactured or approved for sublingual use, so absorption is unreliable. This patient is also unresponsive and cannot protect their own airway, so putting anything in the mouth to dissolve invites aspiration on top of the overdose. The key never asks an unprotected airway to hold a dissolving dose.

Delay transport until naloxone can be given by an available route: Delaying is reasonable when the treatment can safely wait. Four breaths a minute cannot, and a nosebleed from a facial injury may not stop in the field at all, so this ties the patient's care to an event that may never happen. Ventilation and transport both continue regardless of whether naloxone is ever given, because the ventilation is the treatment.

Question 4 of 10

Activated charcoal should be withheld from a patient who has ingested a poison if the patient presents with which finding?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Decreased consciousness with inability to protect the airway

Decreased consciousness with inability to protect the airway is the deciding finding because it means the gag and cough reflexes are impaired, so a slurry of charcoal poured or aspirated into the pharynx can pass into the trachea and lungs instead of staying in the GI tract. That aspiration risk causes chemical pneumonitis and airway obstruction, which outweighs any benefit of binding the ingested poison. When you see this level of consciousness, the priority shifts from GI decontamination to airway management: positioning, suction, and advanced airway control before anything is given by mouth or NG tube.

Why the others are wrong

Nausea and occasional vomiting without other symptoms: exactly what activated charcoal itself commonly produces, since the slurry is unpleasant to swallow and irritates the stomach. Vomiting after a dose calls for repeating or slowing the dose, not withholding it, so this finding treats an expected side effect as if it were a reason to stop treatment.

Passage of black, tarry stools without other symptoms: Passage of black, tarry stools looks like melena from an upper GI bleed, a condition that does present with dark, tarry stool along with hematemesis, tachycardia, and hypotension from blood loss. Here the stool is described "without other symptoms," meaning none of those bleeding signs are present, and black stool by itself is simply the expected color change charcoal produces as it passes through the gut.

Chronic constipation with no associated abdominal pain: describes a known side effect of activated charcoal, which slows GI transit, not a bowel obstruction or ileus; a true obstruction would present with pain and distension, which this option specifically excludes.

Question 5 of 10

A patient is found unresponsive with slow, shallow breathing after a suspected overdose of a prescription pain medication. Which additional finding is most consistent with an opioid overdose?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Pinpoint pupils

Opioid overdose classically causes sedation or coma, hypoventilation or respiratory arrest, hypotension, and pinpoint pupils, which is considered a classic sign of opiate/opioid intoxication.

Why the others are wrong

Dilated pupils: associated with sympathomimetic or anticholinergic overdose, not opioids.

Hypertension: seen with sympathomimetic or anticholinergic toxicity, whereas opioids typically cause hypotension.

Hyperthermia: associated with sympathomimetic or anticholinergic overdose, not opioid overdose.

Question 6 of 10

An EMT responds to a report of an elderly couple found ill in their garden immediately after liquid insecticide was sprayed for mosquito control in their neighborhood. Both patients present with excessive salivation, pinpoint pupils, visible muscle twitching, and reports of diarrhea and nausea. Both are conscious but confused. The scene has been secured. Which toxidrome is most consistent with these findings?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Cholinergic toxidrome (salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, emesis)

The pinpoint pupils (miosis) paired with visible muscle twitching are the findings no other toxidrome explains, since salivation and GI upset alone could point several directions but fasciculations mean nicotinic receptors are involved. The insecticide inhibits acetylcholinesterase, so acetylcholine floods both muscarinic receptors, producing the SLUDGEM pattern (Salivation, Lacrimation, Urination, Defecation, Gastrointestinal upset, Emesis, Miosis), and nicotinic receptors, producing the twitching. This shifts your priority to decontamination and PPE before patient contact, with atropine as the antidote once care begins.

Why the others are wrong

Anticholinergic toxidrome (dry mouth, dilated pupils, agitation, rapid heart rate): Anticholinergic toxidrome shows dry mouth, flushed dry skin, dilated pupils, agitation, and a rapid heart rate, the classic antihistamine or belladonna alkaloid picture. This couple has the opposite findings, excessive salivation and pinpoint pupils instead of dryness and dilation, because anticholinergic and cholinergic effects sit at opposite ends of the same receptor system and can't both describe one patient.

Sympathomimetic toxidrome (dilated pupils, tachycardia, hypertension, agitation): Sympathomimetic toxidrome brings dilated pupils, tachycardia, hypertension, and agitation, typical of cocaine or amphetamine toxicity. Here the pupils are pinpoint, the patients are confused rather than agitated, and the diarrhea and salivation point to parasympathetic overload, so this answers a stimulant-overdose question, not the organophosphate exposure in front of you.

Sedative-hypnotic toxidrome (lethargy, respiratory depression, hypotension): Sedative-hypnotic toxidrome causes lethargy, respiratory depression, and hypotension from a CNS depressant like a benzodiazepine or barbiturate. It gives no explanation for the salivation, muscle twitching, or diarrhea here, findings that reflect autonomic overstimulation rather than depression.

Question 7 of 10

A 28-year-old patient is brought to the EMT by their friend, who reports that the patient became increasingly agitated and paranoid over the last two hours after using a powdered substance. The patient is diaphoretic and tremulous, with P 128/min, BP 168/98 mmHg, and a temperature of 100.9°F. The patient is verbally hostile but is not armed and is not an immediate danger to the crew. Which of the following is the most appropriate action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Attempt to calm the patient and transport in a safe manner, requesting law enforcement if safety is a concern

The deciding line is that the patient is not an immediate danger to the crew despite the verbal hostility. This presentation, agitation, paranoia, tachycardia, hypertension, diaphoresis, and a temperature of 100.9°F, fits a sympathomimetic toxidrome, a catecholamine surge from a stimulant that drives the heart rate and blood pressure up and raises core temperature through increased muscle activity and vasoconstriction. Because the threat level is low, the priority is de-escalation and a calm, safe transport, keeping law enforcement on standby rather than moving straight to restraint or a drug that doesn't touch this physiology.

Why the others are wrong

Administer high-flow oxygen by NRB to slow the rapid heart rate and reduce the patient's agitation: High-flow oxygen by NRB treats hypoxia or respiratory distress, not agitation. The stem gives no low SpO2 or breathing complaint, only stimulant-driven tachycardia, so oxygen doesn't touch the catecholamine surge causing this presentation.

Apply physical restraints immediately to prevent the patient from causing harm to themselves or to the crew: Restraints fit a patient who is combative and an immediate danger to self or crew, and the agitation and hostility here make that call tempting. The stem states the patient is not an immediate danger, only verbally hostile, so force isn't justified. Restraining a hyperadrenergic patient drives catecholamines higher, raising the risk of sudden cardiac arrest.

Administer a dose of intranasal naloxone to reverse the effects of the powdered substance the patient used: Naloxone reverses opioid toxidrome: bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, pinpoint pupils. This patient has tachycardia, hypertension, and fever, the stimulant pattern, not opioid, so naloxone has no target here.

Question 8 of 10

An EMT arrives at a residence where a 24-year-old patient is found by a roommate with reduced consciousness, slow breathing at 8 breaths per minute, and pinpoint pupils. Empty heroin bags are on the nightstand. After the EMT assists ventilations and administers a dose of intranasal naloxone, the patient becomes arousable and breathes 16 times per minute, but grows drowsy again a few minutes later and now refuses further evaluation or transport. Which of the following best describes the appropriate interpretation of this response?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The naloxone has partially reversed acute opioid toxicity, but the patient requires transport because opioid levels may exceed naloxone duration

The decisive finding is the drowsiness returning a few minutes after the naloxone dose, even though the initial dose brought the respiratory rate up to 16 breaths per minute. Naloxone occupies opioid receptors for roughly 30 to 90 minutes, shorter than heroin's duration of action, so as the antagonist clears, unbound opioid reoccupies those receptors and respiratory depression can recur. That mismatch means this patient cannot be left at the scene: transport is mandatory, with continued monitoring of respiratory rate and mental status and repeat naloxone per protocol if depression returns en route.

Why the others are wrong

The naloxone has completely reversed the opioid effect, and the patient may now safely refuse further evaluation and transport: The patient aroused and the respiratory rate rose to 16 after the naloxone, looking like full reversal. The drowsiness returning minutes later shows the opioid effect is still active, just outlasting the antagonist. A patient who was unresponsive with opioid induced respiratory depression cannot give a valid refusal, and this recurrence proves the crisis isn't over.

The patient is now experiencing acute opioid withdrawal, which shows the overdose has resolved and the crisis has passed: Acute opioid withdrawal produces agitation, tachycardia, sweating, and gastrointestinal distress, not sedation, so it doesn't match this patient's renewed drowsiness. The recurring sedation reflects ongoing opioid toxicity as naloxone wears off, not withdrawal, and the crisis is not resolved.

The recurring drowsiness indicates the naloxone dose was ineffective and a different medication is needed to reverse the substance: The initial response, arousal and a respiratory rate up to 16, shows the dose worked. The later drowsiness reflects naloxone's shorter duration compared to the opioid, not treatment failure, and no alternative reversal agent exists at the EMT level.

Question 9 of 10

A 32-year-old patient is found unresponsive with slow, shallow breathing and pinpoint pupils. A family member reports finding empty prescription pill bottles nearby. The vital signs are BP 100/64 mmHg, P 58/min, R 6/min, and SpO₂ 82% on room air. Which of the following is the most appropriate EMT action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Administer intranasal naloxone and support ventilations

Three findings converge and only one thing sits at their intersection: respirations of 6, pinpoint pupils, and empty prescription bottles at the scene. Opioids suppress the brainstem's drive to breathe, which is why the respiratory rate is the number that kills first and the SpO2 of 82% is the consequence rather than the problem. Naloxone displaces the opioid off those receptors so the drive returns, but it needs minutes to work and this patient is hypoxic right now. Both actions belong together for that reason: ventilate to fix the oxygen immediately, give naloxone to fix the cause.

Why the others are wrong

Withhold ventilatory support until naloxone takes effect: Waiting to see whether a drug works before adding support is reasonable when the patient is holding their own in the meantime: someone breathing adequately while a nitroglycerin dose takes effect. This patient is breathing 6 times a minute at 82% on room air, which is not holding anything; brain tissue is hypoxic for every second of that wait. The key beats it because ventilation and naloxone are not competing choices here, and ventilating is what keeps the patient alive during the minutes the naloxone needs.

Administer oral glucose: Oral glucose is the right answer for an altered patient with a low blood glucose who can still protect their own airway. Nothing points there: pinpoint pupils are an opioid finding, not a hypoglycemia finding, and an unresponsive patient breathing 6 times a minute cannot safely take anything by mouth. The key beats it because the findings name opioids specifically, and giving glucose would delay the ventilation this patient needs immediately.

Apply a tourniquet to the affected extremity: A tourniquet is the correct immediate action for life-threatening external hemorrhage from an extremity, where direct pressure cannot control the bleeding. This question describes no injury, no bleeding, and no trauma at all. The key beats it because there is nothing for a tourniquet to control, and the actual life threat on this call is a respiratory rate of 6.

Question 10 of 10

EMS responds to a greenhouse nursery for a 51-year-old worker found confused and drooling heavily. The worker's coveralls are damp and give off a strong chemical odor, and a tipped-over backpack sprayer lies within reach. The vital signs are R 10/min, labored and wet-sounding. The pupils are pinpoint. What action should the EMT take first?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Don protective equipment and decontaminate the worker before contact

The pinpoint pupils and slow, labored breathing look like an opioid overdose at first glance. But the scene tells a different story: damp, chemical-smelling coveralls and a tipped-over backpack sprayer next to a heavily drooling worker. The finding that matters most here is not a vital sign at all. It's the contamination itself. That has to come first. Organophosphate residue on the worker's skin and clothing can transfer straight onto an EMT who makes contact without protection. So the first action is protective equipment and decontamination. The rule isn't specific to this pesticide either. With any patient still covered in a chemical, you can't give emergency care until the decontamination is done and there's no danger of the poison reaching you. Once that's finished, the priorities go straight back to this worker: the secretions filling the mouth and trachea, and support for the breathing. That's why this call starts with protecting the crew and cleaning the patient, not with naloxone or ventilations.

Why the others are wrong

Approach and administer intranasal naloxone: Pinpoint pupils and slow breathing look like an opioid overdose, and naloxone is right for that patient. But the chemical odor and sprayer point to a pesticide exposure instead. Naloxone has no effect on cholinergic toxicity.

Begin positive pressure ventilations without protective equipment: Supporting this patient's breathing is genuinely the next step. But the order matters. The same chemical soaking the coveralls can transfer onto an EMT who makes contact without protection first. So decontamination comes before hands-on ventilation.

Perform a rapid trauma assessment for open wounds: Any patient found down can pull you toward a head-to-toe trauma survey out of habit. But nothing on this call describes a fall, a crash, or any other mechanism of injury. A trauma survey is also hands-on contact with a worker who is still covered in a chemical, so it answers neither the contamination nor the failing breathing.

Find out which EMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free EMT diagnostic

More free EMT practice questions by topic