10 free EMT practice questions: Respiratory Emergencies & Airway Management
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 10
A 34-year-old patient reports facial swelling and difficulty breathing that began about 20 minutes after taking a new blood pressure medication. On exam, there is visible swelling of the lips and tongue, a harsh sound heard during inhalation, and no wheezing at the lung bases. The patient can only speak in a whisper. Which finding indicates the airway obstruction is located above the vocal cords rather than in the lower airway?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Stridor on inspiration only
Airway sounds localize the obstruction, and that is the whole point of listening. The upper airway is one rigid tube, so narrowing there makes air rush turbulently past a fixed point during the strongest inward flow: a harsh, high-pitched sound on inspiration, which is stridor. The lower airway is millions of small collapsible tubes; narrowing there makes wheezing, and it is loudest on exhalation because those airways narrow further as the chest recoils. This patient has inspiratory stridor with no wheeze at the bases, and that pairing places the obstruction above the vocal cords, matching the visible lip and tongue swelling of an angioedema reaction to the new blood pressure medication. Getting the location right drives the plan: upper airway swelling can close completely, so this is an airway emergency needing rapid transport and advanced life support (ALS), and nothing aimed at the lower airway will reach it.
Why the others are wrong
Difficulty breathing: tells you the patient is in trouble and is the reason to move urgently, so it is never a finding to dismiss. It is also the one symptom shared by every respiratory emergency: asthma, pulmonary edema, pneumothorax, and angioedema all produce it, so it cannot point to a location. The key uses a finding that only upper airway narrowing produces, which is what the question is asking for.
Whispered speech: a legitimate severity marker; how many words a patient can string together is one of the fastest bedside measures of air movement, and a whisper means very little is moving. It changes with anything limiting airflow or vocal cord motion, upper or lower, so it grades how bad this is without saying where the narrowing sits. The key names the location; this finding names only the degree.
Facial and lip swelling: shows where the swelling is visible externally, and it is exactly why you should suspect the tongue and airway are involved. It is the reason this patient gets treated as an airway emergency. Visible swelling on the outside is not evidence of where airflow is actually obstructed; a patient can have facial swelling with a completely patent airway. The key is a finding produced by air moving past the narrowing itself, which is direct evidence rather than inference.
Question 2 of 10
A 68-year-old patient reports feeling more tired than usual for the past 2 days and mild difficulty breathing but denies significant distress. On exam, the patient is speaking in full sentences without noticeably increased effort. The lips and fingertips appear cyanotic, and the patient is difficult to keep alert, drifting off between questions. Lung sounds reveal crackles in the right lower lobe. The vital signs are BP 108/68 mmHg, P 104/min, and R 22/min. Which oxygen delivery approach is most appropriate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · An NRB at 15 L/min
Judge oxygenation by what the body shows you, not by what the patient says. Cyanotic lips and fingertips indicate central cyanosis, meaning the hemoglobin arriving at the tissues is not carrying enough oxygen, and a patient who cannot be kept alert and drifts off between questions is showing you the brain feeling that same deficit. Those two objective findings outrank a subjective denial of distress, and they are especially unreliable narrators in an older patient with a pneumonia picture, who often under-reports how bad things have gotten. An NRB at 15 liters per minute delivers the highest oxygen concentration available to an EMT without taking over the patient's breathing, which is what a patient with failing oxygenation and intact ventilation needs. Then reassess constantly, because a patient this obtunded can lose the ventilation side next.
Why the others are wrong
No supplemental oxygen, since the patient denies significant distress: Taking the patient's own report seriously is good practice, and there are absolutely patients with mild complaints who need no oxygen at all. It fails here because the question deliberately puts the subjective and objective findings in conflict and then tells you which is which: the patient denies distress, but the lips are cyanotic and consciousness is slipping. When those two disagree, the physical findings win, and withholding oxygen on the strength of the complaint leaves a hypoxic patient hypoxic.
Nasal cannula titrated to effect: A nasal cannula is the right device for mild hypoxia, for a patient who will not tolerate a mask, and for titrating gently toward a target saturation in someone with chronic lung disease. Its ceiling is low-flow, low-concentration delivery, which is not sized to a patient who is already cyanotic and losing alertness. The key starts high because the deficit is large; you can always titrate down once the color and mental status recover.
Assist ventilations with a BVM: Assisting ventilations is the answer when the bellows are failing: an inadequate rate, poor tidal volume, apnea, or agonal breathing. This patient is at 22 with no noticeably increased effort and is speaking in full sentences, which is a lot of air movement and tells you ventilation is not the failing component. Oxygenation is, so the key targets that directly, while keeping in mind that continued deterioration in mental status would change the answer.
Question 3 of 10
A 74-year-old with baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic diffuse wheezing began coughing forcefully immediately after taking a bite of a sandwich. A family member states the cough is different from the patient's usual chronic cough and started suddenly mid-bite. The patient is currently coughing forcefully, can say "I'm okay, still coughing" between coughs, and the skin is pink. Which of the following is the most appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Encourage continued coughing and monitor closely
Split airway obstruction into two branches before anything else: mild or partial, where the patient is still moving air, and severe or complete, where they are not. Coughing forcefully, speaking between coughs, and pink skin all say air is moving, which puts this patient squarely in the mild branch. A forceful cough generates more airway pressure than any thrust you can deliver, so the treatment is to stay out of the way, keep the patient calm, and watch for the moment it turns severe. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease history is the bait here, not the answer. The sudden onset mid-bite and the family's report that this cough is different from the usual one are what mark it as a new obstruction rather than baseline disease.
Why the others are wrong
Deliver back blows, since the patient is at higher risk due to the underlying lung disease: Back blows are correct for a choking infant under one year, paired with chest thrusts, and appear in severe-obstruction sequences for older patients in many systems. What rules them out here is the effective cough, intervening on a patient who is still moving air risks dislodging a partially obstructing object into a fully obstructing position. Underlying lung disease changes how much reserve this patient has, not the air-movement rule that decides whether you intervene at all.
Assume the cough is from the patient's baseline COPD and continue the assessment: Attributing a chronic cough and chronic diffuse wheezing to baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is entirely reasonable when nothing has changed. Two details say something changed: the cough started suddenly on a bite of food, and the family, who know this patient's baseline, report it sounds different. Writing off a new, sudden, food-associated change as baseline disease is how a foreign body gets missed until the patient goes silent.
Perform abdominal thrusts due to the patient's underlying lung disease: Abdominal thrusts become the right answer the moment this patient stops moving air, goes silent, cannot speak, or turns cyanotic. Right now the patient is speaking in short phrases and is pink, so the criterion for thrusts is not met. This option and the key sit on the same treatment ladder; the key is simply the rung that matches current air movement, and thrusts are what you escalate to the second that changes.
Question 4 of 10
A 3-year-old develops a sudden high fever and excessive drooling and excessive salivation this afternoon, with reluctance to swallow. There has been no cough at any point. The child sits upright in a tripod position with the chin thrust forward and refuses to lie down. Inspiratory stridor is present, and the voice sounds muffled. Which finding most strongly distinguishes this presentation from croup?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · No preceding cough, with drooling
Croup and epiglottitis both narrow a small child's upper airway, so everything they share, fever, inspiratory stridor, tripod posture, real distress, is useless for telling them apart. Two things separate them. Croup is viral swelling below the vocal cords that follows a day or two of cold symptoms and produces the barking, seal-like cough; epiglottitis is a swollen epiglottis sitting directly over the airway, which develops within hours, hurts far too much to swallow, and therefore produces pooling drool and a muffled voice. This child has a sudden onset this afternoon, no cough at any point, and excessive drooling with reluctance to swallow, which is the epiglottitis pattern. That recognition changes your hands immediately: keep the child calm and upright with the caregiver, offer blow-by oxygen only if tolerated, put nothing in the mouth to look, and transport, because agitation can close that airway completely.
Why the others are wrong
Presence of inspiratory stridor: Inspiratory stridor correctly tells you the obstruction is in the upper airway, which is a genuinely useful piece of information and part of why this child is sick. It just does not discriminate, because croup is the textbook cause of pediatric stridor and epiglottitis produces it as well. A finding shared by both candidates on the differential can never be the discriminator between them.
Presence of fever without other signs: Fever is present in both conditions, and in croup it is often the first thing a parent notices. The option's own premise also does not match the question. This child has fever alongside drooling, stridor, a muffled voice, and tripoding, so the fever is anything but isolated. Fever narrows the field to an infectious cause and stops there, which is not far enough to change management.
Tripod positioning during breathing: Tripod positioning is a real and important finding: the child is instinctively holding the airway in its most open position, and you should never force them out of it. It occurs in croup, in epiglottitis, and in severe asthma alike, because it is a response to any high work of breathing rather than to one specific infection. It tells you how hard the child is working, not which disease is making them work, so it cannot settle the question.
Question 5 of 10
A 6-year-old was eating grapes at a birthday party, surrounded by bystanders the entire time, when the child suddenly began coughing forcefully, then went silent, and is now unresponsive and not breathing. What is the most appropriate immediate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Begin CPR, checking for a visible object first
Responsiveness sets the maneuver. A responsive choking child gets abdominal thrusts; the moment they go unresponsive, you lower them to the ground and start CPR. Compressions do double duty here. They circulate whatever oxygenated blood is left and generate the same intrathoracic pressure as a chest thrust, so every compression is another attempt to expel the grape. Each time you open the airway to give breaths, look in the mouth first and remove an object only if you can actually see it. A blind finger sweep is not performed because it can drive a round, slick object like a grape deeper and convert a partial obstruction into a complete one, and this obstruction was witnessed by bystanders the entire time, so there is no diagnostic doubt about what is in there.
Why the others are wrong
Position the child upright for transport: Positioning a patient upright for transport suits a responsive patient with a partial obstruction who is still moving air. You let them hold the position they choose and get moving. This child is unresponsive and not breathing, which is an arrest situation managed on a firm flat surface, not in a seat. Packaging first spends the minutes that decide this outcome and delays the compressions that are the only thing likely to move the object.
Assist ventilations with a BVM: BVM ventilation is exactly right for an unresponsive, apneic patient whose airway is open, an overdose, a head injury, a respiratory arrest with a pulse. The question hands you the reason it will not work: a witnessed foreign body lodged in the airway means air has nowhere to go. Squeezing the bag against a complete obstruction wastes time and can force air into the stomach, raising the aspiration risk without delivering any oxygen.
Insert an oropharyngeal airway and ventilate: An oropharyngeal airway holds the tongue off the back of the throat, which is the right fix for the most common airway obstruction in an unresponsive patient. It does nothing for an object sitting below it, and sliding a rigid device in can push a foreign body further down. The key starts compressions, which is the maneuver that can actually generate the pressure needed to expel the grape, and looks for the object where it can be safely removed.
Question 6 of 10
After a witnessed tonic-clonic seizure, a 30-year-old patient is now postictal, does not open the eyes to voice, withdraws to painful stimulus, and makes incomprehensible sounds. Respirations are 16/min with good, equal chest rise on both sides. The skin is pink, warm, and dry. What is the most appropriate airway management at this time?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Position the airway and insert a nasopharyngeal airway
Airway and breathing are two separate questions, and this item is built on keeping them apart. Breathing is adequate here, at 16 per minute with good, equal chest rise and pink, warm, dry skin, so rate and tidal volume, the actual triggers for assisted ventilation, are both being met. The airway is what is at risk: a postictal patient who does not open the eyes to voice, withdraws to pain, and makes only incomprehensible sounds cannot reliably keep the tongue and secretions out of the way. That calls for positioning, an adjunct, and suction as needed. A nasopharyngeal airway is the right adjunct because it is tolerated by a patient who still has some gag reflex, which is exactly the semi-responsive postictal patient in front of you.
Why the others are wrong
Assist ventilations with a BVM: BVM ventilation is correct when rate or tidal volume fails, meaning respirations too slow, too fast, or too shallow to move air. A decreased level of consciousness by itself is not that trigger, and this patient is at 16 per minute with good, equal chest rise. Forcing positive pressure on a patient who is already ventilating adequately risks gastric insufflation and vomiting, and the key supports the part that is actually failing, which is the airway rather than the breathing.
Insert an oropharyngeal airway and begin ventilating: An oropharyngeal airway is the right adjunct for a deeply unresponsive patient with no gag reflex, and in that patient it holds the tongue forward better than a nasal airway does. This patient still withdraws to pain and vocalizes, so enough protective reflex remains that an OPA is likely to be gagged out or provoke vomiting. This option also adds ventilation the patient does not need, so it gets both the adjunct choice and the breathing assessment wrong at once.
Apply an NRB without an airway adjunct: An NRB is a reasonable oxygen device for a patient with an intact airway who needs a higher concentration, and oxygen may well be part of this patient's care. A mask does nothing to hold an airway open, though, because a tongue that falls back obstructs just as completely with 15 liters flowing over it. The key addresses the mechanical obstruction risk first, since a patent airway is the prerequisite for any oxygen device to accomplish anything.
Question 7 of 10
A patient with a known history of asthma is wheezing and has difficulty breathing during an exacerbation. The patient has a prescribed albuterol metered-dose inhaler. What is the primary effect of albuterol that helps this patient?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · It dilates the bronchioles, easing airflow
Albuterol is a bronchodilator; it relaxes the smooth muscle of the smaller air passages (bronchioles), dilating them and easing airflow during an asthma exacerbation.
Why the others are wrong
It reduces airway swelling over several hours: Reducing swelling over several hours describes an anti-inflammatory medication's slower action, a different mechanism from albuterol's fast bronchodilating effect.
It thins mucus so it can be coughed up: Thinning mucus is not albuterol's mechanism: its action is on the smooth muscle of the bronchioles, not on mucus consistency.
It sedates the patient to reduce anxiety-driven breathing: Albuterol is a bronchodilator with no sedating properties; it does not act on anxiety or sedation.
Question 8 of 10
A 3-year-old child with pneumonia is brought to the ambulance by the mother. Initially, the child was very agitated and using accessory muscles with rapid, labored breathing at 40 breaths per minute. During transport, the EMT notices the child is now calmer, breathing more slowly at 28 breaths per minute with fewer visible retractions. The mother comments the child seems less fussy. The child's level of consciousness appears to be declining. The child is not responding as readily to the mother's voice. What does this change indicate?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The child is decompensating from respiratory distress to respiratory failure and needs immediate reassessment
In a pediatric patient with respiratory disease, a decrease in respiratory effort (fewer retractions, slower breathing) combined with declining mental status (decreased responsiveness) signals progression from respiratory distress to respiratory failure: this is decompensation, not improvement. A child in respiratory failure may paradoxically appear 'calmer' as the work of breathing decreases, but this occurs because the child is tiring and oxygen delivery to the brain is failing. This is a critical finding requiring immediate escalation and airway preparation.
Why the others are wrong
The child is improving in response to the oxygen therapy and should continue the current treatment unchanged: The declining level of consciousness with reduced respiratory effort indicates failure, not a response to therapy; continuing the current treatment without escalation misses the deterioration.
The child has responded well to the oxygen and can be weaned off the supplemental oxygen during transport: Weaning oxygen is only considered in a patient who is genuinely improving; this child's decreasing responsiveness shows worsening, so supplemental oxygen must continue while the EMT prepares to assist ventilations.
The child is calming in response to the mother's reassurance, and the slower breathing reflects improving oxygenation: A parent's reassurance does not explain a falling level of consciousness; a slower respiratory rate with declining responsiveness in a sick child signals fatigue and impending respiratory failure, not improving oxygenation.
Question 9 of 10
A 71-year-old patient with a history of COPD presents with acute difficulty breathing for the past 2 hours. The patient is sitting upright, leaning forward, and breathing through pursed lips. Respiratory rate is 26 breaths per minute with slight accessory muscle use. Oxygen saturation is 88% on room air. The patient can speak only in short 3-4 word phrases. Which of the following represents the most appropriate EMT management?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Position the patient upright and provide supplemental oxygen, titrated to clinical response
This is a COPD exacerbation with hypoxemia. Positioning the patient upright for comfort and providing supplemental oxygen titrated to clinical response is standard EMT management: oxygen is given to treat the hypoxia and adjusted based on how the patient responds, rather than being pushed to a fixed high number or withheld.
Why the others are wrong
Apply high-flow oxygen by NRB to achieve an oxygen saturation of 98% or greater: Forcing the oxygen saturation to 98% or greater with an NRB overshoots for a patient with COPD whose baseline saturation runs lower; titrating to clinical response is the correct approach rather than chasing a fixed high target.
Withhold supplemental oxygen to avoid suppressing the patient's hypoxic respiratory drive: Withholding oxygen out of fear of suppressing the hypoxic respiratory drive is based on an outdated and debunked idea: current EMS teaching does not support withholding needed oxygen from a hypoxic patient.
Place the patient supine and begin positive pressure ventilations with a BVM: This patient is upright by choice, speaking in short phrases, and moving air; supine positioning and positive pressure ventilations are reserved for inadequate breathing and would work against the position that supports this patient's respiratory effort.
Question 10 of 10
A 56-year-old patient who underwent knee surgery 5 days ago and has been mostly immobilized presents with acute difficulty breathing and chest discomfort. The patient denies cough or fever. Vital signs: respiratory rate 28, heart rate 116, blood pressure 118/76, oxygen saturation 94% on room air. Lung sounds are clear and equal. There is no lower extremity swelling or calf pain. Which respiratory emergency should be suspected?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Pulmonary embolism from post-surgical immobility
The clinching combination is hypoxia with clear lungs. A saturation of 94% alongside tachypnea at 28 and a heart rate of 116, in lungs that are clear and equal in every field, means the problem is not in the airways or the alveoli: air is getting in fine. It is on the blood side: a clot lodged in the pulmonary circulation, so part of the lung is ventilated but not perfused, and blood returning to the left heart was never oxygenated. Then read the history for why a clot formed. Knee surgery five days ago with mostly immobility since is the textbook setup: stasis in the leg veins, surgical injury, and the inflammatory state after an operation. Do not let the normal legs talk you out of it: a clot that has already broken loose and traveled leaves the calf looking and feeling normal, so absent swelling and absent calf pain never rule out pulmonary embolism. Field care is oxygen, position of comfort, monitoring, and rapid transport.
Why the others are wrong
Acute COPD exacerbation with bronchospasm: A COPD exacerbation is the answer in a patient with known chronic lung disease whose breathing has worsened past baseline, and the lungs tell you so: wheezing, rhonchi, prolonged expiration, diminished air movement. This patient has clear and equal lung sounds and no chronic lung disease in the history. You also would not explain an onset five days after knee surgery with a disease that has been present for years.
Community-acquired pneumonia with pleuritic pain: Pneumonia is right when infection has filled alveoli, and it announces itself with fever, a productive cough, and focal crackles or rhonchi over the involved area, usually building across a day or more. This question removes both halves specifically: the patient denies cough and fever, and the lungs are clear. That is the clean split: pneumonia puts something in the alveoli that you can hear and that makes the patient febrile, while an embolism blocks blood upstream of alveoli that stay clear.
Anxiety attack with hyperventilation syndrome: Anxiety and panic can absolutely produce tachypnea, tachycardia, and chest discomfort, and this is the most dangerous distractor in the set because it is the one that gets a real embolism dismissed. Anxiety does not lower oxygen saturation, hyperventilating tends to push it up, so the 94% on room air is the objective finding anxiety cannot explain. Add a major risk factor five days old and calling this panic means missing a diagnosis that can kill within the hour.
Find out which EMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free EMT diagnosticMore free EMT practice questions by topic
Scene Size-up and Safety
Primary Assessment
Secondary Assessment
Patient Treatment and Transport
- Cardiovascular Emergencies & Cardiac Arrest
- Respiratory Emergencies & Airway Management
- Shock (All Types) & Hemorrhage Control
- Neurological & EENT Emergencies
- Endocrine Disorders
- Abdominal, GI, GU & Renal Disorders
- Hematologic, Immunologic & Infectious Disorders
- Psychiatric & Behavioral Emergencies
- Toxicology & Substance Use Emergencies
- Head, Spinal & Nervous System Trauma
- Chest, Abdominal & Multi-System Trauma
- Orthopedic, Soft-Tissue & Burn Trauma
- Obstetric, Neonatal & Gynecologic Emergencies
- Pediatric, Geriatric & Special Populations
- Medication Administration
- Environmental Emergencies