10 free AEMT practice questions: Advanced Airway Management and Adjuncts
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 10
A 30-year-old patient is unresponsive after being struck in the head, has snoring respirations, and gags when the oropharynx is touched. The AEMT is about to place a nasopharyngeal airway and reassesses the head and face first. Which finding makes the nasal route the wrong choice?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Bruising behind one ear
Bruising behind the ear, along with bruising around both eyes and clear drainage from the nose or ears, says the base of the skull is fractured. That matters for a nasal airway because the roof of the nasal cavity is a thin, perforated sheet of bone that also forms part of the floor of the skull, so a fracture there opens a route a device passed through the nose can follow. Most systems treat that as a hard contraindication, so you pick a plan that does not pass through the nose. A patient who gags is telling you the oral airway is out too, which leaves you with manual positioning, suction, and ventilation.
Why the others are wrong
A hematoma over the left forehead: A forehead hematoma tells you where the impact landed, and any sign of head trauma should make you look harder at everything else. A hematoma over the frontal bone does not tell you the skull base is involved, and it does not change which route you use.
Bleeding from a scalp laceration: Scalp bleeding is dramatic and it pulls your eye first, since the scalp bleeds heavily from small wounds. A laceration is a soft tissue injury, and on its own it says nothing about the bone underneath or about the nasal passage.
A left pupil larger than the right: Unequal pupils is a genuinely serious finding and it should change how fast you move. It points at rising pressure inside the skull rather than at a fracture of the skull base, and it has no bearing on which airway adjunct you reach for.
Question 2 of 10
A 3-month-old patient choked during a feed and now has milky secretions in the mouth and nose with noisy breathing. The crew's suction unit is set at its usual working pressure. How does the AEMT clear this infant's airway?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Use a bulb syringe, clearing the mouth first
Two things change for an infant and one thing does not. What changes is the tool, a bulb syringe rather than the unit and a catheter, and the time limit, 5 seconds rather than the adult's 15. What does not change is the force, because the vacuum setting is the same across every age, and a unit turned down far enough to feel gentle simply fails to move the secretions. Clear the mouth before the nose, because an infant who takes a breath while you are working on the nose pulls whatever is still sitting in the mouth straight down. Babies under about six months breathe mostly through the nose, so clearing those nares is real airway management rather than housekeeping.
Why the others are wrong
Use a bulb syringe, clearing both nares first: Clearing the nares matters more in an infant than in anyone else, since an infant breathes through the nose by preference, which is exactly why this order is tempting. Going to the nose first triggers a breath that pulls the milk still sitting in the mouth down into the airway, so the mouth comes first.
Use a soft catheter in the nares with the unit's pressure turned down: Lowering the pressure for a small patient sounds like the careful thing to do, and it is the single most common thing students believe about pediatric suctioning. Suction force is not adjusted by age, and a unit turned down that far does not clear the secretions at all.
Use a rigid catheter in the mouth for no more than 10 seconds: A rigid catheter is what you reach for with an adult airway full of fluid, so it is a habit carried into the wrong patient. It is too large for an infant's mouth, and 10 seconds is the child's limit rather than the infant's 5 seconds.
Question 3 of 10
A paramedic on a shared call placed an endotracheal tube in a 49-year-old patient, and the AEMT is managing the airway during transport. Secretions are visible in the tube and the capnogram has become erratic. The AEMT preoxygenates and measures the catheter against the tube. How is the catheter used?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Inserted with no suction, then withdrawn with suction while rotating
Suctioning below the cords follows the rule you already use in the mouth, with one addition. The vacuum is off on the way down, because suction applied while you advance strips oxygen out of the lungs and drags the tip against the tracheal wall. The vacuum goes on as you withdraw, and you roll the catheter between your fingers so the side holes sweep the whole circumference instead of grabbing one spot. Depth comes from the length of the tube, so the tip advances only a little past the far end. Preoxygenate first, ventilate with high concentration oxygen immediately after, and watch the heart rate, because stimulating the trachea can drop it through a vagal response, especially in a child.
Why the others are wrong
Inserted with suction applied so secretions are caught on the way down: Catching secretions on the way down sounds more efficient, and the mental picture of a vacuum cleaner makes it feel right. Suction on the way in pulls oxygen out of the lungs during the trip down and lets the tip grab tracheal tissue, so you cause injury and hypoxia for nothing.
Advanced to the carina, then withdrawn with the suction cycled on and off: Advancing to the carina and cycling the vacuum comes from thinking deeper is more thorough. Touching the carina sets off the strongest vagal response and the worst coughing, and the catheter is measured against the tube for exactly that reason, so the tip sits just past the end.
Inserted and withdrawn with continuous suction for a full 15 seconds: Continuous suction on a stopwatch sounds disciplined, and 15 seconds is a real number you should know. The limit is a ceiling rather than a target, and leaving the vacuum on during insertion is what makes this wrong no matter how long the attempt runs.
Question 4 of 10
An AEMT is inserting a supraglottic airway in an apneic 57-year-old patient. The device stops advancing about halfway in, and the depth marking is well short of the teeth. What does the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Withdraw it slightly and add a jaw thrust before readvancing
Resistance partway in almost always means the tip has caught on the tongue or the epiglottis rather than that the device is too big. Backing out a little unhooks it, a jaw thrust lifts the tongue and the epiglottis out of the path, and the device usually slides the rest of the way on the second try. The one thing you never do is force it, because the tissue in front of the tip is what tears. Keep the head neutral or slightly sniffing and the device midline, and if it still will not seat, go back to two-provider bag-valve-mask ventilation rather than making a third hard attempt.
Why the others are wrong
Hold steady pressure until the device passes through the resistance: Pushing through feels like persistence, and a patient who is not breathing puts real pressure on you to get the airway in. Force is what causes bleeding and swelling in the tissue you need, and the device is not going to pass an epiglottis it has already folded over.
Remove it and insert the next smaller size instead: Downsizing is a reasonable thought and it is the right move when the device genuinely does not fit. Resistance at the halfway point is a path problem rather than a size problem, and swapping devices spends an insertion attempt you did not need to spend.
Rotate it 90 degrees and advance along the lateral pharynx: Rotation is a real technique for an oral airway, so borrowing it here has a logic to it. Taking a blind insertion device off the midline points the tip into the piriform recess instead of the hypopharynx, which makes the seat worse rather than better.
Question 5 of 10
A 45-year-old patient is unresponsive after falling from a ladder and does not gag when the mouth is suctioned. Respirations are 12 and snoring. There is bruising behind the left ear and clear fluid draining from the right nostril. A partner hands the AEMT a lubricated nasopharyngeal airway. What should the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Insert an oropharyngeal airway instead
Bruising behind the ear, bruising around both eyes, and clear drainage from the nose or ears all say the same thing: the base of the skull may be fractured, and the floor of the nasal cavity may no longer be intact. A device advanced along that floor can follow the fracture instead of the airway, so most systems treat these findings as a reason to pick a different plan entirely. Switching nostrils does not help you, because the fracture is at the base of the skull rather than in one side of the nose. What makes the oral airway available here is that the patient did not gag when you suctioned, and no gag reflex is the one requirement that device has. Keep the head neutral while you work, since this patient fell from a height.
Why the others are wrong
Insert the nasopharyngeal airway in the opposite nostril: Drainage from one nostril makes the other side look clean and usable, and switching sides is what you would do for a deviated septum or a nosebleed. The contraindication is not a property of one nostril. It sits at the base of the skull, which both nasal passages share.
Suction the drainage away and then insert the nasopharyngeal airway: Clearing fluid before you place a device is good habit, and clear drainage looks like something you should be able to suction away. That fluid is a sign of the injury, not an obstruction to get past, and suctioning it changes nothing about where the device would travel.
Hold a manual jaw thrust for the rest of the transport: A jaw thrust is exactly right for a patient who fell from a ladder, because it opens the airway without extending the neck, so this option gets the positioning half correct. It leaves the tongue unsupported for the whole transport and occupies a provider who will be needed elsewhere. Use the jaw thrust and place the adjunct this patient can take.
Question 6 of 10
A 5-year-old patient is unresponsive with no gag reflex after being pulled from a backyard pool. The AEMT has sized an oropharyngeal airway from the corner of the mouth to the angle of the jaw. How should the device be inserted?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Right side up, with a tongue depressor holding the tongue down
The adult trick of going in upside down and rotating exists to keep the device from dragging the tongue backward, and it works because adult palate tissue tolerates the sweep. A child's soft palate is far easier to tear, so that rotation trades one problem for a bleeding airway. In a child or an infant you hold the tongue down with a depressor and slide the device in facing the way it will sit. The sizing named here, corner of the mouth to the angle of the jaw, is one of the two accepted landmarks for an oral airway, and corner of the mouth to the earlobe is the other. Both are used at any age. Keep the head neutral while you work, because a child's soft trachea kinks closed when the head is pushed too far back.
Why the others are wrong
With the tip toward the roof of the mouth, rotating it 180 degrees: This is the adult technique, taught early and practiced often, so it is the first thing most hands reach for. In a child that rotation drags the hard plastic across soft palate tissue that tears easily, and bleeding into an airway you were trying to open is a trade you never want.
Sideways into the mouth, rotating it 90 degrees once it clears the teeth: A partial rotation feels like a compromise between the adult method and something gentler. There is no 90 degree technique in the pediatric method, and any rotation inside a child's mouth carries the same risk to the palate that the full turn does.
Straight back with the head extended as far as it will go: More extension does feel like more airway, and it is the reflex that head-tilt training builds. A child's trachea is soft enough that full extension kinks it closed, so pushing the head back further shuts the airway you are trying to open.
Question 7 of 10
A 48-year-old patient choked while eating and could not speak or cough. Abdominal thrusts were performed without relieving the obstruction, and the patient is now unresponsive on the floor. Two ventilation attempts produce no chest rise even after the airway is repositioned. What is the most appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Begin chest compressions, looking in the mouth before each breath
Once a choking patient becomes unresponsive, the management changes from thrusts to chest compressions. Compressions generate airway pressure comparable to an abdominal thrust and have the advantage of also circulating blood in a patient who is now at high risk of arrest. The airway is opened before each ventilation attempt and the mouth is inspected at that moment; an object is removed only if it is actually seen. That sequence, compressions then look then attempt to ventilate, continues until the obstruction clears or care is transferred.
Why the others are wrong
Perform a blind finger sweep to remove the object: A finger sweep is a real maneuver, but only when the object is visible in the mouth of an unresponsive patient and can be hooked out. Nothing in this question says the object is visible; the failure to get chest rise tells you the obstruction is still there, not that it is within reach of a finger. Performed blind, a sweep more often drives the object deeper past the cords, which is why the key builds a look-first step into the compression cycle instead of reaching in on faith.
Insert a supraglottic airway in an attempt to bypass the obstruction: A supraglottic airway is the right tool for an unresponsive, apneic patient whose airway below the glottis is open, such as a cardiac arrest or an overdose you cannot mask-ventilate well. It seats in the hypopharynx and ventilates through the glottic opening, so it does not bypass anything sitting at that level, and the two repositioned ventilation attempts that produced no chest rise are the evidence that the obstruction is right there. Placing one buys nothing and stops the compressions that are actually raising airway pressure against the object.
Remove the object with Magill forceps under direct laryngoscopy: Instrumented removal with forceps under direct laryngoscopy is the definitive fix for an obstruction that will not clear, and an advanced life support (ALS) crew carrying that scope will attempt it. It is not an AEMT skill, and even where it is available it happens during ongoing resuscitation rather than in place of it. Compressions start now because they both pressurize the airway and perfuse the patient, and the instrumented look is the step after, never the step instead.
Question 8 of 10
An AEMT is ventilating a 61-year-old patient in cardiac arrest. Two-person BVM ventilation with an oropharyngeal airway has been attempted, the head has been repositioned, and a large volume of air still escapes around the mask with each breath. The chest does not rise, and waveform capnography shows no waveform. Compressions are in progress. What is the most appropriate action regarding the airway?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Insert a supraglottic airway and confirm placement
A supraglottic airway earns its place when the mask has been optimized and still fails, and every optimization step has already been taken here: two rescuers, an oropharyngeal airway in place, and the head repositioned. Air escaping around the mask with no chest rise and no capnography waveform means no ventilation is occurring at all, which is a failed technique rather than a technique that needs more patience. The supraglottic airway solves the specific problem, because it seals below the level of the face and takes the mask seal out of the equation entirely. Confirm it the same way any airway gets confirmed: chest rise, breath sounds, silence over the epigastrium, and a sustained rectangular waveform, which is the only confirmation that keeps reporting after the first check. Note the boundary: this is the ceiling of the AEMT airway kit, and the tube is not part of it.
Why the others are wrong
Continue the current BVM technique: Continuing is correct when the mask is working, and the absent waveform proves it is not. Repeating a technique that has already been optimized and still delivers no ventilation costs the patient every minute it continues.
Intubate the trachea to secure the airway: Endotracheal intubation is above the AEMT scope of practice and cannot be the action regardless of how difficult the airway is. The supraglottic airway is the AEMT-level answer to the same problem.
Insert a nasopharyngeal airway and continue: A nasopharyngeal airway addresses obstruction by the tongue and soft tissue, which the oropharyngeal airway already in place is doing. It does nothing about a mask that will not seal, so the leak and the absent chest rise continue.
Question 9 of 10
An AEMT responds for a 68-year-old patient whose larynx was surgically removed two years ago and who is now unresponsive and apneic with a carotid pulse. There is a single midline opening at the base of the neck with no tube in it, and the opening is clear of secretions. A partner has begun BVM ventilation over the mouth and nose, and there is no chest rise and no waveform on capnography. What is the most appropriate action?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Seal an infant mask over the neck opening and ventilate through it
A patient who has had a laryngectomy breathes through a permanent tracheal stoma, and the midline opening at the base of the neck is the only opening that can be used to ventilate. Because the upper airway no longer connects to the trachea, ventilating over the mouth and nose moves no air, which is what the absent chest rise and the absent capnography waveform show. With no tube in the stoma, an infant or child mask is used with the bag-valve device to make a seal directly over the opening, and the mouth and nose are sealed with one hand during the breath so that air does not leak out through the upper airway, then released for exhalation. Sealing the opening and ventilating from above is the technique for a patient whose upper airway is still connected to the lungs, which is not the case once the larynx has been removed, and neither the head tilt-chin lift nor the jaw-thrust maneuver is needed to ventilate through a stoma.
Why the others are wrong
Seal the neck opening and keep ventilating the mouth and nose: A student picks this because they learned that a patient with a neck opening can be ventilated from above by covering the opening so the delivered breaths are not vented out through it, which is correct when the upper airway is still connected to the lungs. The question states the larynx was surgically removed, so the mouth and nose no longer reach the trachea and sealing the opening closes off the only route that does.
Suction the neck opening before attempting to ventilate through it: A student picks this because they think absent chest rise through a neck opening means it is plugged with secretions. Suctioning the stoma is the step for a patient who cannot be ventilated through it, and no breath has yet been delivered through this stoma; the question states the opening is clear of secretions, so there is nothing to remove and suctioning only delays the first breath that can actually reach the lungs.
Perform a jaw-thrust maneuver and keep ventilating the mouth and nose: A student picks this because absent chest rise usually means the tongue is obstructing and a jaw thrust is the fix. In a patient whose larynx has been removed, the mouth and nose no longer connect to the trachea, so no manual maneuver on the upper airway will move air into the lungs.
Question 10 of 10
An AEMT inserts a nasopharyngeal airway in a 52-year-old patient who is unresponsive with an intact gag reflex and snoring respirations. The airway was lubricated and met no resistance during insertion, and the flange rests against the nostril. Ventilations by BVM continue at the same rate and volume as before insertion, and chest rise is unchanged. Within a minute the pulse falls from 92 to 48 and the upper abdomen begins to distend with each delivered breath. What is most likely causing these findings?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The airway is too long for the patient
Two findings appeared together right after insertion, a pulse that fell from 92 to 48 and a stomach that began to inflate with each delivered breath, while nothing about the ventilation changed. Both are what a nasopharyngeal airway that is too long produces: the tip reaches far enough to stimulate the vagus nerve and slow the heart rate, or it passes into the esophagus so that delivered air is carried into the stomach. The correct length is measured from the tip of the nose to the earlobe before insertion. The device is withdrawn, sized again, and reinserted at the correct length while the pulse and chest rise are reassessed.
Why the others are wrong
The airway was placed in the smaller nostril: A student picks this because they know the airway belongs in the larger nostril and reach for the sizing error they remember. The question states the airway met no resistance going in and that the flange rests against the nostril, and the corpus attaches the vagal bradycardia and the gastric distention to a device that is too long, not to the choice of nostril.
The airway has become obstructed by mucus: A student picks this because a nasal airway with a small diameter can be obstructed by mucus, blood, or vomitus. An obstructed airway would show as reduced airflow and poorer chest rise, and the question states chest rise is unchanged, so air is still reaching the lungs at the same volume.
The bag is being squeezed with too much force: A student picks this because forceful ventilation is the usual reason a stomach fills with air. The question states ventilations are continuing at the same rate and volume as before the airway was inserted, so the technique did not change; what changed was the device now sitting in the airway.
Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free AEMT diagnosticMore free AEMT practice questions by topic
Airway, Respiration & Ventilation
- Advanced Airway Management and Adjuncts
- Ventilation and Oxygenation Support
- Pulmonary Disease Processes: Sorting the Dyspneic Patient
Cardiology & Resuscitation
Trauma
Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology
- IV Therapy and Fluid Administration
- Medication Administration Routes
- Diabetic Emergencies and Glucometry
- Respiratory Emergencies and Nebulized Medications
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies
- Neurologic Emergencies: Stroke, Seizure, and Altered Mental Status
- Endocrine Emergencies Beyond Diabetes
- Gastrointestinal, Renal, and Genitourinary Emergencies
- Toxicology and Overdose Management
- Sepsis and Systemic Infection
EMS Operations
- AEMT Scope of Practice and Medical Direction
- Specialized Transport Considerations
- Scene Safety, Personal Protection, and Infection Control
- Multiple Casualty Incidents, Triage, and Incident Command
- Documentation, Communication, and Confidentiality
- Ambulance Operations and Equipment Readiness
- Responder Wellness and Resilience