Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree AEMT practice questions · Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology

10 free AEMT practice questions: Allergic Reaction and Anaphylaxis

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A 38-year-old patient developed itching and a patch of raised red welts across both forearms about twenty minutes after weeding a garden. The voice is clear, speech comes in full sentences, the lung sounds are clear in all fields, and there is no swelling of the lips or tongue. The vital signs are BP 126/74, P 84, R 16, and SpO₂ 98% on room air. How should the AEMT classify this reaction?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A localized allergic reaction, since no other body system is involved

Sorting an allergic reaction comes down to one question: has the histamine release stayed in the skin, or has it reached the airway or the circulation. Here the voice is clear, the lungs are clear, and the pressure and pulse are ordinary, so the skin is carrying the whole reaction. That makes it a localized allergic reaction, and it earns monitoring and transport rather than epinephrine. Keep reassessing on the way in, because the same patient can cross the line later, but you classify what is in front of you right now.

Why the others are wrong

Anaphylaxis, since hives cover more than one part of the body: How much skin is involved feels like it should matter, and widespread hives do look alarming. Area is not the measure. A body covered in hives with nothing else involved is still one system, and one system is a localized reaction.

An anaphylactic reaction in its early stage, ahead of the airway signs: Calling it early anaphylaxis feels cautious, and caution is usually the right instinct. The problem is that it turns a classification into a prediction. Treat the airway and pressure findings you actually have, and reassess for the ones you do not.

A biphasic reaction returning after an exposure earlier in the day: A biphasic reaction is symptoms coming back hours after a reaction that was already treated. This patient has had one reaction that has not gone away and come back, so there is no first round for this to be the second of.

Question 2 of 10

A 79-year-old patient with coronary artery disease and two prior stents has hives, swelling of the lips, and audible wheezing about eight minutes after a wasp sting. A crew member says epinephrine could strain this heart and suggests oxygen, an antihistamine, and a fast trip instead. The vital signs are BP 94/56, P 118, R 24, and SpO₂ 93% on room air. Which action should the AEMT take?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Give epinephrine into the thigh muscle and monitor the heart closely

Your partner is not wrong about the drug. Epinephrine raises heart rate, blood pressure, and how much oxygen the heart muscle demands, and in a patient with coronary disease that is a genuine cost. It is still the wrong call, because there is no absolute contraindication in true anaphylaxis and the reaction itself is already threatening this heart with a systolic of 94 and a pulse of 118. A cardiac history changes what you watch afterward, not whether you give it. Give the drug, then keep a close eye on the rhythm and the chest.

Why the others are wrong

Give the antihistamine now and hold epinephrine for a falling pressure: Reserving a stimulating drug for the sickest moment sounds like exactly the judgment an experienced provider would show. The pressure is already falling and the airway is already involved, so the sickest moment has arrived, and holding the drug lets a treatable reaction keep stressing the heart.

Give a nebulized bronchodilator, which carries less cardiac risk here: A bronchodilator does open the lower airways and it feels gentler on a coronary patient. It is not gentler in the way that matters, since albuterol also drives the heart rate up, and it leaves the swelling and the vessel dilation completely untreated.

Establish a line and give fluid, then reassess before any epinephrine: Fluid is a real part of anaphylaxis care and it does not stress the coronaries, which makes it the safest looking action on the page. Fluid cannot shrink a dilated container, so the pressure keeps drifting down while the minutes epinephrine works best in go by.

Question 3 of 10

A 60-year-old patient in anaphylaxis after eating shellfish received epinephrine into the thigh muscle, high-concentration oxygen, and airway support. The throat tightness has resolved and the wheezing has eased, but the patient is still pale and weak. An intravenous line is in place. The vital signs are BP 82/54, P 124, R 22, and SpO₂ 96% on oxygen. Which action should the AEMT take?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Give an isotonic crystalloid bolus through the line and reassess

Anaphylaxis is distributive shock, which means the vessels dilated and then leaked. Epinephrine tightens the container back down and that is why it comes first, but it does not replace the plasma that has already escaped into the tissue. When the pressure stays down after intramuscular epinephrine and airway management, the next step at your level is a bolus of isotonic crystalloid with a reassessment after it. You are filling a container that is closer to its normal size than it was, which is why the fluid does more now than it would have before the drug.

Why the others are wrong

Give a nebulized bronchodilator to finish clearing the lower airways: Treating the remaining wheeze is reasonable thinking, and a bronchodilator is in your scope. The wheezing has already eased and the number that has not moved is the blood pressure, so this treats the part of the patient that is improving.

Place the patient on the side and recheck the pressure in five minutes: Repositioning and rechecking is safe and costs nothing, which is what makes it attractive. A systolic of 82 with a pulse of 124 after the drug is a patient who needs volume, not another five minutes of observation.

Hold further treatment, since the airway findings have already cleared: The airway clearing really is the most dangerous half turning around, so that reads as the call going well. Perfusion is still failing, and the reaction keeps leaking volume out of the vessels while you wait.

Question 4 of 10

A 25-year-old patient used a prescribed epinephrine auto-injector after a bee sting fifteen minutes ago. The hives have faded, the wheezing is gone, the patient feels completely well, and the question is why an ambulance ride is still necessary. The vital signs are BP 126/80, P 88, R 16, and SpO₂ 99% on room air. Which explanation should the AEMT give?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The symptoms can return hours later even without another exposure

Feeling well after an auto-injector is not the same as being finished. Epinephrine wears off on a timetable the reaction does not follow, and the histamine release can flare again hours later with nothing new touched or eaten. That second round is a biphasic reaction, and it is the reason every anaphylaxis patient is transported, including the ones who improve dramatically. Say it that way to the patient, because a normal set of vital signs at minute fifteen is the most convincing argument for going home and the least reliable one.

Why the others are wrong

The epinephrine itself has to be watched for several hours afterward: Monitoring after a strong drug sounds like standard care and it puts the focus on something concrete. The concern is the reaction coming back rather than the drug lingering, and epinephrine is short acting, which is the opposite of a drug you would babysit for hours.

The sting site has to be checked for infection before the day is out: Sting sites do get infected and a wound check is honest advice, so this feels responsible. It also makes the trip sound optional and routine, which undersells the actual reason and gives the patient an easy way to decline.

The blood pressure tends to drop once the swelling starts coming down: Pressure drops are the feared event here, so this has the right anxiety attached to it. It is not how the reaction behaves. Swelling coming down is improvement, and there is no rule that the pressure falls afterward.

Question 5 of 10

A 72-year-old patient in anaphylaxis after a medication exposure has hives, swelling of the tongue, and wheezing. A family member hands the crew a bottle of oral antihistamine and asks whether that should be given while the crew sets up. Where do antihistamines belong in the treatment of anaphylaxis?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · After epinephrine, as a hospital and advanced life support addition

Antihistamines and steroids are real anaphylaxis drugs, but they are hospital and advanced life support additions and they never come before epinephrine. The reason is timing and reach. An oral antihistamine takes far too long to matter in a reaction measured in minutes, and it does nothing for a tongue that is swelling or vessels that are already dilated. Epinephrine reverses both halves right now. Give it first, and let the rest of the pharmacy happen later in a building with a physician in it.

Why the others are wrong

Before epinephrine, since blocking histamine stops the whole cascade: Blocking the chemical that causes the problem is elegant reasoning and it is how the drug actually works. The block only stops histamine from attaching to receptors it has not reached yet, and it arrives far too slowly to matter while a tongue is swelling.

Alongside epinephrine, so both drugs reach the tissue at the same time: Giving both at once sounds efficient, and in the hospital the patient often does get both. The risk is what happens on scene, where setting up a second drug delays the first one, and the first one is the only one that reverses the reaction.

In place of epinephrine when the reaction is caught within ten minutes: Catching a reaction early does make everything easier, so the instinct that timing matters is right. Nothing substitutes for epinephrine at any point in the reaction, and an early reaction is exactly the one where the drug works best.

Question 6 of 10

Two patients are treated on the same shift for allergic reactions. One began having symptoms within two minutes of a sting, and the other began having symptoms about forty minutes after a meal. What does the speed of onset tell the AEMT about a reaction?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A faster onset tends to mean the reaction will be more severe

Most reactions start within minutes of the exposure, and how fast they start is a rough measure of how hard they will hit. The faster the onset, the more histamine is reaching more tissue in less time, so the reaction has less runway before it involves the airway and the circulation. That does not make a slow starting reaction safe, and it does not let you predict the ending. It does tell you which of these two patients you get set up for first, and which one you plan on watching more closely.

Why the others are wrong

Onset speed reflects the amount of allergen rather than the severity: Dose and effect usually do go together, so tying speed to the amount of allergen sounds mechanically sensible. Speed of onset is used as a severity marker rather than as a measure of how much got in, and a tiny exposure can produce a very fast reaction.

A slower onset is more dangerous, since the reaction builds unnoticed: Slow and quiet problems really are dangerous in a lot of medicine, which gives this a ring of truth. Allergic reactions run the other way, since the faster ones are the ones already flooding tissue with histamine when you arrive.

Onset speed predicts which body system the reaction will involve first: Wanting a clue about which system gets hit first is a reasonable thing to want on this call. Onset speed does not sort airway from circulation from skin, so this offers information the finding cannot give.

Question 7 of 10

A 90-year-old patient in anaphylaxis after eating shrimp has just received epinephrine into the thigh muscle. The voice is hoarse and the face is visibly swelling. The vital signs are BP 106/64, P 112, R 22, and SpO₂ 93% on room air. Which action should the AEMT take next?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Give high-concentration oxygen and keep a BVM within reach

Epinephrine buys time, but it does not undo swelling that is already in the tissue, and a face that is still swelling with a hoarse voice is an airway on its way to closing. High-concentration oxygen loads the patient while the passage is still open, and having suction and a BVM in your hand rather than in the bag is what makes the next two minutes survivable if the airway gets worse. Prepare for the airway you may have shortly, not the one you have now.

Why the others are wrong

Set up a nebulized bronchodilator for the narrowing that is developing: A bronchodilator is useful when bronchospasm is the trouble and it is a normal part of this call later. The findings here are a hoarse voice and a swelling face, which sit above the vocal cords where a nebulized drug cannot reach.

Establish a line and start an isotonic crystalloid bolus for the swelling: Fluid is the next step for anaphylaxis that stays hypotensive after epinephrine, so the rule exists. This pressure is holding at 106 systolic, and fluid does nothing about tissue swelling, so this spends your hands on the wrong problem.

Lay the patient flat and recheck the pressure in about five minutes: Lying flat with a recheck is the right answer for the hypotensive version of this patient. Laying a patient flat whose face and throat are swelling makes the airway harder to manage at the moment it needs the most room.

Question 8 of 10

An 88-year-old patient has hives, tongue swelling, and audible wheezing about ten minutes after a first dose of a new antibiotic. An intravenous line is already in place from an earlier transfer, and a crew member is reaching for the roller clamp to run fluid wide open. The vital signs are BP 76/44, P 130, R 24, and SpO₂ 92% on room air. Which action should the AEMT take?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Give epinephrine into the thigh muscle first, then address the volume

The low pressure is real, and fluid is part of this call, but the order matters more than either. Anaphylaxis is distributive shock driven by histamine mediated vasodilation and capillary leak rather than blood loss, which is why fluid alone does not fix it. Pouring saline into a container that keeps getting bigger and leakier buys very little. Epinephrine tightens the vessels and stops the leak, and once it is in, an isotonic crystalloid bolus is exactly what you give if the pressure stays down.

Why the others are wrong

Run the fluid wide open, since the vessels have lost their volume: A line is already in and a systolic of 76 makes fluid feel urgent, which is what makes this the tempting one. The volume was never lost, it moved into the tissue through leaking vessels, so fluid alone chases a problem that keeps regenerating.

Give an antihistamine through the line to stop the histamine effect: An antihistamine aims straight at the chemical named in the mechanism, and the line makes it easy to give. Antihistamines are hospital and advanced life support additions and never come before epinephrine, and this one would work far too slowly here.

Raise the legs and recheck the pressure before committing to a drug: Leg elevation is the right position for this patient and costs almost nothing to do. Doing it instead of giving the drug delays the treatment, and there is nothing about this presentation that a recheck would clarify.

Question 9 of 10

An AEMT cannot tell whether a wheezing patient is having an asthma attack or an anaphylactic reaction, and the guidance is to treat as anaphylaxis when the call is genuinely too close to make. Why is that the safer error?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Epinephrine also helps an asthmatic, while a bronchodilator misses swelling

Guess wrong in one direction and the patient still gets better. Intramuscular epinephrine given to an asthmatic improves the bronchospasm, so an asthmatic who did not need it is treated anyway. Guess wrong in the other direction and albuterol given to a patient in anaphylaxis treats the least dangerous part of the problem while the airway closes. The two mistakes are not the same size, and that is the whole argument. When the picture is genuinely unclear, take the error that still helps the patient you actually have.

Why the others are wrong

Epinephrine and a bronchodilator reach the narrowed airway equally fast: Both drugs do work quickly, so comparing them on speed sounds like the right axis. Speed is not what separates them here, since a bronchodilator never reaches swollen tissue above the vocal cords no matter how fast it is given.

Anaphylaxis is far more common than asthma among adults who wheeze: Choosing the more common condition is usually sound reasoning in a close call. Asthma is far more common than anaphylaxis among people who wheeze, so this gets the frequency backwards, and the argument rests on consequences rather than counts.

A bronchodilator cannot be given once epinephrine is already on board: Ruling out the second drug makes the choice sound final and high stakes. Nothing stops you from giving a bronchodilator after epinephrine, and doing exactly that is common once the reaction is treated and wheezing remains.

Question 10 of 10

A 17-year-old patient ate shellfish at a family dinner about twelve minutes ago and now has hives across the trunk, has vomited twice, and reports cramping abdominal pain. The voice is clear, the lungs are clear, and the patient speaks in full sentences. The vital signs are BP 116/72, P 104, R 18, and SpO₂ 98% on room air. How should the AEMT classify this presentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Anaphylaxis, because two body systems are involved at the same time

Two systems are in play and neither of them is the one everyone watches for. Hives are the skin, and gastrointestinal cramping, vomiting, or diarrhea counts as a second system, so this patient meets the definition with a clear voice and a normal blood pressure. The mistake that costs patients is waiting for hypotension before calling it anaphylaxis. Twelve minutes after shellfish, with the skin and the gut both reacting, this is anaphylaxis and it is treated as anaphylaxis right now.

Why the others are wrong

A localized allergic reaction, since breathing and pressure are normal: Normal breathing and a normal pressure are genuinely reassuring numbers, and they are the ones everyone checks. A localized reaction stays in one place and one system, and this reaction has already reached the skin and the gut at once.

Food poisoning, since vomiting and cramping came on after a meal: Vomiting and cramping after a meal is the classic food poisoning story, so the setting fits. Food poisoning takes hours rather than twelve minutes and does not produce hives, and the timing here points straight at an allergen.

A biphasic reaction that will declare itself over the next few hours: Biphasic reactions are worth knowing about and this patient may still have one later. That term describes symptoms coming back after treatment appeared to work, and this reaction is the first one and it is happening now.

Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free AEMT diagnostic

More free AEMT practice questions by topic