Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree AEMT practice questions · Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology

10 free AEMT practice questions: Gastrointestinal, Renal, and Genitourinary Emergencies

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

A 57-year-old patient with severe epigastric pain and vomiting asks for a sip of water during transport. The abdomen is tender without rigidity. The vital signs are BP 126/78, P 100, R 18, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. What is the appropriate response?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Keep the patient nothing by mouth and document the last oral intake

Keep this patient nothing by mouth. The patient has severe epigastric pain with vomiting, and the abdomen is tender. An abdomen that might need surgery stays empty. Anything the patient swallows can raise the risk during anesthesia. Food or drink can also make the surgical exam harder to read. Nothing by mouth is the standing rule for abdominal pain in the field. Then write down what the patient last ate or drank, and when. The surgical team will ask, and you may be the only one who heard the answer. A dry mouth is uncomfortable. Explain to the patient why you cannot give water instead of handing over a cup.

Why the others are wrong

Offer small sips of water, since the vomiting risks dehydration: Replacing lost fluid makes sense, and this patient really is losing fluid from vomiting. Water by mouth is the wrong route for an abdomen that might need surgery. The fluid this patient needs goes in through an IV line, not through the stomach.

Offer ice chips only, since they do not count as oral intake: Ice chips sound like a way to keep the patient comfortable without breaking the rule. Ice turns into water once it melts. That means ice chips count as oral intake and carry the same anesthesia risk as a drink of water.

Allow water only after the abdomen has been palpated a second time: Basing the decision on your exam sounds like good clinical thinking. Palpating the abdomen again does not change whether the stomach should be empty for surgery. The second exam gives you no new information on this question.

Question 2 of 10

A 77-year-old patient with a suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has cool skin and a weak but palpable radial pulse. Two lines are running and transport is under way. The vital signs are BP 84/62, P 124, R 22, and SpO₂ 95% on room air. Which fluid target should the AEMT work toward?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A perfusion endpoint such as a maintained radial pulse and mental status

This patient is in hemorrhagic shock from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The blood pressure is 84/62, the pulse is 124, the skin is cool, and the radial pulse is weak but present. Shock usually gets corrected with volume. Right now, the only thing slowing this bleed is the clot sitting on the tear. Pushing the blood pressure back up toward normal can knock that clot loose and make the bleeding worse. With uncontrolled bleeding inside the body, you aim for perfusion you can see instead of a number on the monitor. You want a radial pulse that stays present, a mental status that holds, and skin that is not getting worse. Give fluid in measured amounts and reassess between each one instead of running the line wide open toward a pressure goal.

Why the others are wrong

A systolic of 130 to 140 with a strong radial pulse at all times: Bringing the pressure back to normal is the right goal for most hypovolemic patients. In this patient, a normal pressure can knock loose the clot that is limiting the bleed. That's why a systolic of 130 to 140 is the wrong target here.

A fixed two liters of isotonic crystalloid regardless of the response: A fixed volume is simple to give and simple to chart. Two liters given no matter what ignores how the patient is responding. The reassessment between each amount is what decides whether you give the next one.

No fluid at all until the patient reaches the operating room: Holding fluid has some logic, because fluid can make an uncontrolled bleed worse. The fluid gets titrated, not withheld. Giving no fluid does not protect this patient. A patient who gets no fluid can lose the radial pulse completely.

Question 3 of 10

A 26-year-old patient of childbearing age reports sudden one-sided lower abdominal pain and light-headedness, and states that a period is about three weeks late. The skin is pale and cool and the abdomen is tender in the left lower quadrant. The vital signs are BP 92/68, P 124, R 22, and SpO₂ 96% on room air. How should the AEMT manage this patient?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · As internal hemorrhage, with two large-bore lines and rapid transport

This patient most likely has a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and is bleeding into the abdomen. The period is about three weeks late, the pain is on one side, and the skin is pale and cool. The pulse is 124 and the blood pressure is 92/68. Any patient of childbearing age with abdominal pain gets ectopic pregnancy on your list. A missed period with one-sided pain and signs of shock puts ectopic pregnancy at the top. A ruptured ectopic bleeds into the belly, so the patient mostly looks like a shock patient with one-sided pain. Treat the bleeding. Start two large-bore lines, give crystalloid titrated to perfusion, keep the patient warm, and transport fast. Notify early so the surgical team is ready. The pregnancy test gets done at the hospital, and you do not need the test to treat the bleeding.

Why the others are wrong

As an infectious abdomen, with warming measures and routine transport: An infection can cause lower abdominal pain, and keeping a patient warm is part of shock care. An infection builds over days and brings a fever. This pain came on suddenly with pale skin and a pulse of 124, and a routine transport wastes time this patient does not have.

As renal colic, with analgesia per protocol and a position of comfort: Renal colic does cause one-sided pain, and analgesia is the right care for a kidney stone. A patient with a kidney stone writhes in pain, but without pale, cool skin. Treating this patient as a stone delays the surgeon who has to stop the bleeding.

As an anxiety reaction, with coached breathing and reassessment on scene: Light-headedness with a fast pulse can come from anxiety. Pale, cool skin and a narrow pulse pressure are perfusion findings, and anxiety does not cause them. Staying on scene to coach breathing keeps a bleeding patient away from surgery.

Question 4 of 10

A 69-year-old patient reports two days of dull lower abdominal pain and briefly passed out while walking to the bathroom this morning. The abdomen is soft with mild diffuse tenderness. The vital signs are BP 106/78, P 108, R 18, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. Which feature of this presentation most raises concern for a serious cause?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The syncopal episode occurring along with abdominal pain

Passing out along with abdominal pain is the most serious finding here. Fainting means the brain did not get enough blood flow. This patient has had two days of abdominal pain and then passed out walking to the bathroom. Passing out tells you something about blood volume that the soft belly does not. In an older adult, abdominal pain with syncope raises concern for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Other high-risk findings with abdominal pain are pain out of proportion to the exam, a rigid abdomen, a pulsing mass, and signs of shock. Pain into the back, vomited blood, and black tarry stool are on the same list. Any one of those changes your priority. An older adult with abdominal pain already has a higher risk of a serious cause than a young adult. The syncope adds to that risk.

Why the others are wrong

The pain has been present for two days rather than for hours: A longer course can point to a slower, more chronic problem. Plenty of serious abdominal problems also run two days. The timeline here does not sort a dangerous cause from a harmless one.

The tenderness being diffuse rather than confined to one quadrant: Tenderness all over the belly can seem more worrying than tenderness in one spot. Mild tenderness all over is common with pain coming from the organs, whatever the cause. The fainting is what points to a blood flow problem, not the pattern of tenderness.

The absence of vomiting or diarrhea with the abdominal pain: Gastroenteritis usually brings vomiting or diarrhea, so their absence makes gastroenteritis less likely. Missing vomiting and diarrhea narrows the list a little. Their absence does not put this patient in the high-risk group, and the high-risk group is what the question asks about.

Question 5 of 10

A 49-year-old patient with a history of gallstones reports severe epigastric pain that bores straight through to the back, along with repeated vomiting since last night. The mucous membranes are dry and the skin is warm. The vital signs are BP 104/68, P 116, R 20, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. Which intervention should the AEMT anticipate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Vascular access with isotonic crystalloid titrated to perfusion

This patient most likely has pancreatitis and is low on fluid. The epigastric pain bores straight through to the back, and the patient has a history of gallstones. The mucous membranes are dry, and the pulse is 116. The inflamed pancreas leaks fluid into the tissue around it. The vomiting since last night pulls out even more fluid. Pancreatitis patients are usually far more volume depleted than they look. Get vascular access and give isotonic crystalloid titrated to perfusion, rechecking the patient between each amount. Pain medicine is in AEMT scope where local protocol allows it. You give the pain medicine along with the fluid, not instead of the fluid.

Why the others are wrong

A position of comfort with no vascular access required: A position of comfort is part of care for a painful abdomen, and some abdominal pain patients need nothing more. This patient has dry mucous membranes, repeated vomiting, and a pulse of 116. A position does not fix a volume problem.

Oral rehydration with sips of clear fluid during transport: Sips of clear fluid can replace fluid loss in a patient who can keep them down. An abdomen that may need surgery stays nothing by mouth. A patient who has been vomiting since last night will not keep the fluid down anyway.

Withholding fluid until the pain has been controlled: Pain control is part of good care, and analgesia is in scope where protocol allows it. Pain medicine and fluid do not compete here. Holding fluid until the pain is controlled leaves this patient's perfusion problem untreated.

Question 6 of 10

A 71-year-old patient on hemodialysis missed a treatment over a holiday weekend and now has difficulty breathing that is worse when lying flat. There are crackles to the mid-fields, the neck veins are distended, and both legs are swollen. The vital signs are BP 188/96, P 94, R 28, and SpO₂ 88% on room air. Which management approach is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Upright positioning with oxygen and CPAP

This patient has fluid overload from a missed dialysis treatment. The breathing is worse lying flat, there are crackles to the mid-fields, the neck veins are distended, and both legs are swollen. The kidneys cannot get rid of fluid, and the dialysis that removes the fluid was missed. The extra fluid backs up into the lungs. This patient has too much fluid, not too little. Sit the patient fully upright and give oxygen. Add CPAP when the patient is awake and able to cooperate. Transport to a facility that can do dialysis. A fluid bolus here makes the patient worse, the same way a bolus does in cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Why the others are wrong

A 500 mL isotonic crystalloid challenge with lung sounds reassessed after: A small fluid challenge with lung sounds rechecked afterward is careful practice in a hypovolemic patient. This patient already has fluid backing up into the lungs. Even 500 mL adds to the fluid that is already filling the lungs.

Supine positioning with oxygen by nasal cannula and routine transport: Oxygen is right for an SpO₂ of 88%. Placing a patient with pulmonary edema flat makes the work of breathing worse. This patient's breathing is already worse lying flat. Routine transport also ignores how close this patient is to needing help with ventilation.

Nebulized albuterol before any change in the patient position: Albuterol is a good treatment for an asthma attack or a COPD flare, where the airways are tight. Crackles mean fluid in the alveoli, not bronchospasm. Giving a nebulizer before you sit the patient up treats the wrong problem.

Question 7 of 10

A 64-year-old patient who missed two dialysis treatments has weakness and a 12-lead tracing showing tall peaked T waves and a broad QRS. The monitor prints an automated interpretive statement suggesting hyperkalemia. The vital signs are BP 152/90, P 62, R 18, and SpO₂ 96% on room air. What is the appropriate AEMT action with this tracing?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Transmit the tracing and describe the findings in the notification

Getting a 12-lead and transmitting the tracing are in the AEMT scope. Reading a 12-lead is a paramedic skill. This patient missed two dialysis treatments, and the tracing shows tall peaked T waves and a broad QRS. You have a tracing nobody else has yet. Send the tracing ahead so a physician can read it early. In your notification, describe what you see in plain terms, like peaked T waves and a widening QRS, without giving a diagnosis. The monitor printed its own statement suggesting hyperkalemia. That printed statement does not change your scope. The statement is a reason to transmit fast, not a reading for you to confirm.

Why the others are wrong

Record a formal interpretation of hyperkalemia in the patient care report: The findings really are on the tracing, and writing down what they mean sounds like thorough documentation. Interpreting a 12-lead is paramedic scope. An AEMT who records a formal reading of hyperkalemia has gone past the certification, even if the reading is right.

Hold the tracing for the emergency department rather than sending it early: Handing the tracing over in person seems safe, since the physician will read the tracing either way. Waiting gives up the whole reason to transmit. A tracing sent early lets the hospital get ready before this patient arrives.

Repeat the tracing with the electrodes moved to confirm the abnormality: Repeating a tracing is good practice when a lead is loose or a finding is unexpected. Moving the electrodes to confirm the finding delays your notification. A repeat with the electrodes moved can also give you a tracing that is harder to compare, not clearer.

Question 8 of 10

A 68-year-old patient on hemodialysis with nausea and weakness needs vascular access and a blood pressure. There is a mature fistula in the left forearm with good veins visible above and below it, and the right arm has smaller but usable veins. The vital signs are P 104, R 18, and SpO₂ 96% on room air. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Use the right arm for both the line and the blood pressure

Use the right arm for both the IV and the blood pressure. The left forearm has a mature fistula. The fistula arm is off limits, and that means the whole arm, not just the area near the fistula. Never start a line, put on a tourniquet, or take a blood pressure in the fistula arm. A fistula takes months to mature after surgery. If the fistula clots, the patient can lose dialysis access completely. Use the other arm, even when its veins are smaller. Write down which arm you used so the hospital keeps protecting the fistula arm. While you are there, feel for a thrill and listen for a bruit over the fistula. Document what you find either way.

Why the others are wrong

Use the left arm below the fistula and take the blood pressure on the right: Going below the fistula sounds like a safe middle ground, since the needle is not in the fistula itself. A tourniquet and a catheter anywhere in the left arm still put the fistula at risk. The rule covers the whole arm, not a distance from the fistula.

Use the left arm above the fistula and take the blood pressure on the left: Going above the fistula seems to protect the fistula while still using the better veins. Any pressure or needle stick in the left arm threatens the fistula, no matter where. A blood pressure cuff on the fistula side is never allowed.

Use the fistula itself, since it is already a mature vascular site: The fistula is a large, reliable vessel that gets needles three times a week for dialysis. Putting a needle in the fistula is a dialysis procedure, not a field procedure. An AEMT using the fistula risks infection, bleeding, and loss of the access.

Question 9 of 10

An 18-month-old patient with three days of vomiting and diarrhea had a pulse of 180 when the crew arrived. Ten minutes into transport the child has become limp and the pulse has fallen to 78. The vital signs are BP 70/40, P 78, R 14, and SpO₂ 92% on room air. What does this change indicate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Deterioration, since bradycardia in a sick child precedes arrest

This child is in decompensated shock and is close to cardiac arrest. The pulse dropped from 180 to 78, and the child became limp. The respiratory rate is 14, the saturation is 92 percent, and the blood pressure is 70/40. A slowing pulse in a child who was tachycardic is one of the most dangerous findings in pediatrics. The number moves toward normal, and a normal-looking number can fool you. In a sick child, bradycardia is a pre-arrest finding. The child's compensation has failed. Support ventilation and oxygenation now, keep the fluid going per protocol, and treat this child as an arrest about to happen.

Why the others are wrong

Improvement, since the compensatory tachycardia has resolved: A pulse moving toward normal usually means a patient is getting better. A child whose compensation is failing slows down on the way to arrest. This child is also limp with a slow respiratory rate, so the slower pulse means the opposite of improvement here.

A vagal response to the vomiting that will correct on its own: Vomiting can cause a vagal response that slows the heart for a short time, and that slowing goes away on its own. A brief vagal response does not leave a child limp. This child also has a respiratory rate of 14 and a saturation of 92 percent.

A normal resting pulse for a child who has fallen asleep: Sick children do sleep, and caregivers often describe exactly that. A pulse of 78 is below the normal resting rate for an 18-month-old. A limp child with a saturation of 92 percent is not sleeping. This child's level of consciousness is dropping.

Question 10 of 10

A 58-year-old patient with a history of cirrhosis has vomited a large amount of bright red blood and now has cool, pale skin. Vital signs are BP 82/54, P 128, R 26, SpO₂ 93%. Which action is most appropriate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Establish two large-bore IVs and titrate isotonic crystalloid to perfusion per protocol

This patient has cirrhosis and has vomited a large amount of bright red blood. Vomiting blood in a patient with cirrhosis points to bleeding esophageal varices. Varices can bleed out within minutes. This patient is already unstable. The blood pressure is 82/54, the pulse is 128, and the skin is cool and pale. Start two large-bore IVs and titrate isotonic crystalloid to perfusion per protocol. Position the patient to protect the airway, because these patients aspirate. Have suction ready, keep the patient warm, and keep monitoring. Notify the receiving facility early. This patient can get worse faster than the first set of vitals suggests.

Why the others are wrong

Establish a single peripheral IV and transport, reassessing every 15 minutes: A single IV line gives too little access for this patient. The patient already shows signs of hemorrhagic shock from what could be a massive variceal bleed. An unstable gastrointestinal bleed needs two large-bore lines.

Withhold IV fluid until the bleeding source is definitively controlled: Withholding fluid ignores the shock this patient is already in. For an unstable gastrointestinal bleed, you titrate isotonic crystalloid to perfusion. Holding all fluid delays the perfusion support this patient needs now.

Position the patient supine with legs elevated and administer oxygen only: Lying flat puts this patient at risk of aspirating while the vomiting continues. Oxygen alone, with no IV access and no fluid, does nothing for the shock this patient is already showing.

Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free AEMT diagnostic

More free AEMT practice questions by topic