10 free AEMT practice questions: IV Therapy and Fluid Administration
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 10
An AEMT's first attempt at peripheral intravenous access in a 44-year-old patient's hand does not thread. The catheter has already been drawn halfway back out when the partner suggests pushing the needle down it to try the vein again. What should the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Withdraw the whole unit and start again with a new catheter
Once you have started pulling the catheter back, the needle bevel no longer lines up inside it. Slide that needle forward again and it can slice the soft plastic tip clean off inside the vein, and the fragment travels downstream as a catheter embolus. The whole unit comes out together, and you open a fresh catheter for the next attempt. Losing a catheter is cheap. Chasing a plastic fragment through the circulation is not.
Why the others are wrong
Reinsert the needle slowly and advance only if blood returns: Going slowly does not change the geometry. The bevel still sits against the inside wall of a catheter that has moved, and slow pressure shears it just as cleanly as fast pressure.
Reinsert the needle and advance the catheter under low pressure: Low pressure has the same problem. The shear happens because the needle edge meets plastic that is no longer seated on it, not because the push was forceful.
Leave the catheter in place and attach tubing to test the flow: A catheter that is half withdrawn is no longer reliably in the vessel, so running fluid through it puts that fluid into the tissue and delays the access the patient needs.
Question 2 of 10
During a peripheral intravenous attempt on a 79-year-old patient who takes Eliquis, the vein is punctured and a firm, tender, discolored swelling rises quickly at the site. What should the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Remove the catheter and hold firm direct pressure over the site
The firm, tender, discolored swelling rising quickly at the site is a hematoma: blood escaping through the punctured vessel wall into the surrounding tissue. Eliquis is apixaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, so clotting at that puncture is impaired and the bleed expands faster and larger than it would in a patient not on an anticoagulant. That's the finding that decides your response: pull the catheter, hold firm direct pressure over the site longer than you normally would, then move to a different limb for your next attempt.
Why the others are wrong
Leave the catheter in place and run fluid to keep the vein open: Running fluid to keep a vein open is standard when the catheter is patent and the vessel is intact, but here the vessel wall has already been breached. Pushing fluid through it drives more volume into the tissue and grows the hematoma you're trying to stop.
Apply a warm pack and attempt the same vein slightly higher up: A warm pack has a role later, once bleeding has stopped, because heat increases local blood flow, the opposite of what a leaking vessel needs right now; going back into the same vein just above a fresh hematoma also just sends fluid out the lower puncture.
Wrap the arm loosely and reattempt below the swelling in the hand: A loose wrap generates no real compression, and a site distal to the hematoma still drains through the same injured vein, so infused fluid leaks out at the puncture instead of running to the heart.
Question 3 of 10
A nursing facility asks an AEMT crew to transfer a 68-year-old patient to a receiving hospital. The patient has a vasopressor infusion running on a pump through a peripheral line, and the sending nurse says the rate may need adjusting during the trip. What should the crew arrange before leaving?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · A paramedic or a nurse to ride along and manage the infusion
The word that decides your scope on vascular access is medicated. You start lines and you maintain fluids that have nothing added to them. A vasopressor is a drug being titrated into a vein, which is a medicated infusion, and managing one is above your certification. That does not make the transfer impossible. It makes it a transfer that needs someone licensed to run that pump riding with you, either a paramedic or a nurse.
Why the others are wrong
Written orders from the sending physician for the pump settings: Paperwork does not change what your certification allows. An order written on a page authorizes a provider who is already permitted to perform the act.
A second AEMT to watch the pump while the first drives the unit: Two AEMTs are still two AEMTs. Adding a second set of hands at the same certification level does not add the ability to titrate a drug infusion.
A telephone line to online medical direction for the rate changes: A physician on the phone can direct choices inside your scope, and cannot reach through the phone and make a medicated infusion something you are certified to manage.
Question 4 of 10
An AEMT has placed an intraosseous needle in the proximal tibia of a 26-year-old patient with pinpoint pupils and a respiratory rate of 4. Ventilations are in progress. The partner asks whether the naloxone dose changes because the route is intraosseous rather than intravenous. What is the accurate response?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Give the same dose, because the route reaches the same circulation
The marrow cavity is a sponge of vessels that drains straight into the systemic veins, so anything you put into it arrives in the same bloodstream a peripheral line feeds. That is the whole point of the route. Everything in your medication set, and isotonic crystalloid too, goes in at the same dose it would through a vein. Treat the intraosseous line as the vein you could not get, not as a weaker version of one.
Why the others are wrong
Halve the dose, because marrow absorbs faster than a vein does: Cutting a dose because the route feels different underdoses a patient who is barely breathing. The marrow empties into the same circulation the vein does.
Double the dose, because marrow absorbs more slowly than a vein: Doubling is just as wrong in the other direction. There is no absorption penalty to compensate for once the drug is in the venous circulation.
Give the same dose, but only after the line has run for a minute: A flush is required to open the marrow before fluid will move, and there is no waiting period that has to pass before a medication may be given.
Question 5 of 10
A 35-year-old patient pulled from a house fire has circumferential burns over both lower legs and is in decompensated shock. Two peripheral attempts have failed and intraosseous access is needed. The upper arms are not burned. Which site should the AEMT use?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The proximal humerus on the unburned upper arm
The decisive finding is that the burns are circumferential over both lower legs while both upper arms are unburned, which takes the tibia off the table on either side and leaves the humerus as the only limb with an intact vascular bed for marrow perfusion. Driving an IO needle through burned, devitalized skin pushes contaminated tissue into the marrow space and risks poor flow through damaged microcirculation. With decompensated shock and two failed peripheral attempts, you need reliable, fast-flowing access now, so you go to the proximal humerus: locate the greater tubercle with the arm adducted and the hand resting on the abdomen, a site that also infuses faster than the tibia.
Why the others are wrong
The right proximal tibia, through the burned skin: The tibia is the site AEMTs default to first, but going through the burned skin on the right lower leg drives contaminated eschar and debris straight into the marrow, the exact scenario the contraindication exists to prevent.
The left proximal tibia, below the burned area: You might reach below the burn line on the left tibia since that site is standard teaching's first choice, but circumferential means the burn wraps all the way around both lower legs, leaving no unburned window anywhere on that limb; the whole leg is compromised, not just the burned patch, so it stays ruled out.
The distal femur just above the burned knee: The distal femur is the primary IO site in infants and young toddlers, not a 35-year-old, and this one also sits directly above a burned knee, giving two separate reasons to skip it.
Question 6 of 10
A 45-year-old patient who weighs about 72 kilograms is hypotensive from a gastrointestinal bleed and has a large-bore catheter and macrodrip tubing in place. The partner opens the roller clamp all the way, hangs a second liter beside the first, and walks away to set up the stretcher. What should the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Give the fluid in measured boluses with a reassessment between each
The decisive finding is the wide-open roller clamp with a second liter already hung and the partner stepping away, leaving fluid running unmonitored on a hypotensive GI bleed patient. Physiologically, GI bleeding depletes both volume and clotting factors; dumping crystalloid in fast dilutes remaining clotting factors and can push fluid into the pulmonary vasculature faster than the vascular bed can accommodate it, risking pulmonary edema in a lung field that started clear. The fix is to close that clamp, run roughly 20 mL/kg (about 1,400 mL for this 72-kg patient) in measured boluses, and recheck mental status, pulse, skin, lung sounds, blood pressure, and capnography between each one before continuing.
Why the others are wrong
Let both liters run and check a pressure after the second bag: A pressure check does count as reassessment, but the clamp is already wide open, so both liters run before that check happens, and one blood pressure after two liters is thinner evidence than the ongoing exam boluses give you between doses.
Leave the line wide open, because the pressure is the priority: Running the line wide open toward a pressure number treats blood pressure as the steering wheel, but pressure is a late sign in shock and by the time it drops the damage of over-infusion is already done; this patient needs measured, reassessed volume, not unmonitored flow.
Slow the line to a keep-vein-open rate until the hospital calls: A keep-vein-open rate fits a patient who is stable and doesn't need volume, but this patient is hypotensive from an active GI bleed and needs a real fluid bolus, not a trickle; slowing to KVO withholds the treatment the hypotension calls for.
Question 7 of 10
A 45-year-old patient requires a peripheral intravenous line for routine medication administration. Which of the following sites should the AEMT select first?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Forearm or hand vein (cephalic, basilic, or dorsal hand vein)
The forearm and dorsal hand veins (cephalic, basilic) sit over a long straight stretch of tissue away from any joint, so they don't kink or restrict flow when the patient bends the elbow or wrist. That stability lets the line run reliably for routine medication administration without needing to splint the joint or worry about dislodgement, which makes this the first site an AEMT should choose before considering the antecubital fossa or any site the patient's condition limits.
Why the others are wrong
Antecubital fossa (median cubital vein at the elbow crease): The median cubital vein at the elbow crease is large and easy to hit, which makes it tempting. It crosses the antecubital fossa, a joint, so elbow flexion can kink the catheter or shear the vessel during a routine infusion. Save this site for situations needing rapid, large-volume access, not routine medication administration when a forearm or hand vein works.
A vein in the arm on the same side as a prior mastectomy with lymph node removal: This arm is accessible and no other injury is present, but axillary lymph node removal from the mastectomy disrupts lymphatic drainage in that limb, raising the risk of lymphedema and infection if it's cannulated. That risk, not routine access needs, rules the entire limb out, not just as a second choice.
A vein located distal to a suspected forearm fracture site: A distal vein below a suspected forearm fracture assumes any patent vein will do. Cannulating distal to a fracture risks infiltration into compromised tissue and worsens swelling that already threatens circulation, so IV access should go proximal to or on the unaffected limb instead. This is a site to avoid, not a step out of order.
Question 8 of 10
EMS is called for a 62-year-old patient with signs of hypovolemic shock secondary to trauma. En route, the AEMT establishes intravenous access. Which fluid is the appropriate first-line choice for resuscitation, and why?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Normal saline, because it is isotonic and stays in the vascular space in the short term
Normal saline is an isotonic crystalloid, matching plasma osmolality, so when it hits the vascular space it stays there in the short term instead of shifting into or out of cells. That's the mechanism behind volume expansion in hypovolemic shock secondary to trauma: you need the fluid to hold the circulating volume up long enough to restore perfusion until blood products or definitive control are available. This is why normal saline is the default first-line resuscitation fluid for trauma and shock, over any fluid built around dextrose or reduced tonicity.
Why the others are wrong
D5W, because the dextrose supplies energy while the fluid expands the circulating volume: D5W looks like a reasonable volume expander because the bag itself is isotonic going in, but once the dextrose is metabolized the remaining free water disperses through total body water instead of staying in the vessels, so it produces no sustained intravascular expansion for this trauma patient in shock; it's used as a maintenance or medication-carrier fluid, not a resuscitation fluid.
D50, because a concentrated dextrose bolus acts more rapidly than a liter of crystalloid can infuse: D50 is a concentrated dextrose bolus reserved for documented hypoglycemia, and nothing in this presentation points to a low blood glucose; pushing it faster than a liter of crystalloid can infuse doesn't replace lost circulating volume.
Half-normal saline, because it rehydrates the body's cells as well as the vascular space: Half-normal saline is hypotonic, so much of the infused water moves out of the vascular space into the cells, which works against the goal of restoring the volume deficit in a hypovolemic trauma patient.
Question 9 of 10
An AEMT is transporting a 26-year-old patient with a stab wound to the right upper quadrant. External bleeding is minimal, the abdomen is rigid and tender, and the skin is cool and pale. Two large-bore intravenous lines were established en route and 500 mL of normal saline has been infused. The patient now answers questions appropriately. Breath sounds are clear bilaterally and the neck veins are flat. The vital signs are BP 86/58, P 116, R 22, and SpO₂ 97% on room air. The trauma center is 14 minutes away. What should the AEMT do with the fluid?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Titrate the infusion to keep the systolic pressure between 70 and 90
Fluid resuscitation for bleeding that is still happening inside the abdomen is titrated, not maximized. For internal and non-compressible bleeding the guidance is warmed isotonic solution in 250 to 500 mL boluses while maintaining a blood pressure between 70 and 90 mmHg, rather than driving toward a normal pressure before the source is controlled. The rigid, tender abdomen with minimal external bleeding is the finding that identifies this as non-compressible hemorrhage, and the flat neck veins and clear breath sounds confirm the fluid given so far has not overloaded the patient. The same reassessment rule also disposes of slowing to a keep-vein-open rate: that step belongs to a patient whose vital signs have returned to normal and stayed there, which 86/58 with a pulse of 116 has not.
Why the others are wrong
Infuse both lines wide open until the systolic pressure reaches 120: A normal blood pressure looks like the goal of fluid resuscitation. Bleeding into the abdomen cannot be compressed in the field, and the fluid guidance for internal and non-compressible bleeding names a pressure band well below normal rather than restoration of a normal pressure.
Slow both lines to a keep-vein-open rate now that the patient is talking: A patient talking appropriately reads as a good response. The infusion is slowed to a keep-vein-open rate when the vital signs return to normal and stay normal; a blood pressure of 86/58 with a pulse of 116 is not a normal set of vital signs.
Titrate the infusion to keep the systolic pressure between 100 and 110: A chronically hypertensive patient can be in shock above 100, and this carries that number across. That rule adjusts how shock is recognized in a hypertensive patient; it is not the titration target for uncontrolled internal hemorrhage, where the stated band runs lower.
Question 10 of 10
An AEMT is at the side of a 22-year-old patient with a gunshot wound to the left thigh. Direct pressure and a tourniquet have stopped the bleeding. The skin is cool and pale, capillary refill is four seconds, and breath sounds are clear bilaterally. The vital signs are BP 84/54, P 132, R 26, and SpO₂ 96% on room air. The patient is already loaded on the stretcher in the patient compartment and the crew is ready to move. The trauma center is 12 minutes away. The partner suggests getting the lines in before pulling away so the fluid can start sooner. What should the AEMT do?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Begin transport and establish two large-bore lines en route
The sequencing question in hemorrhagic shock is settled before the access question. Shock management runs scene safety, body substance isolation, and rapid transport without unnecessary scene delays, and then, under circulation, control of external bleeding followed by two large-bore intravenous lines started en route. Both halves of that instruction are being tested at once. The bleeding is already controlled by direct pressure and a tourniquet, the patient is already loaded, and the receiving trauma center is 12 minutes away, so nothing about staying parked improves the odds. The lines still get established, they are still two, and they are still large bore: the moving ambulance is simply where that happens.
Why the others are wrong
Establish both lines on scene before beginning transport: A stationary ambulance is an easier place to cannulate and starting fluid sooner sounds like better care. Shock management calls for rapid transport without unnecessary scene delays; the patient is already loaded and the crew is ready, so time spent parked buys line access at the cost of time to definitive hemorrhage control.
Establish one line on scene and the second en route: Splitting the difference feels safe: one line secured now, one later. It is still a scene delay for a patient who is already loaded, and it is the delay itself, not the number of attempts, that the guidance targets.
Begin transport and establish one small-bore line en route: A smaller catheter threads more easily into the collapsed veins of a poorly perfused patient. Catheter diameter is one of the factors the guidance names as affecting flow, and shock management specifies two large-bore lines started en route; a small-bore line in a patient this poorly perfused delivers volume too slowly to change the outcome.
Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free AEMT diagnosticMore free AEMT practice questions by topic
Airway, Respiration & Ventilation
Cardiology & Resuscitation
Trauma
Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology
- IV Therapy and Fluid Administration
- Medication Administration Routes
- Diabetic Emergencies and Glucometry
- Respiratory Emergencies and Nebulized Medications
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies
- Neurologic Emergencies: Stroke, Seizure, and Altered Mental Status
- Endocrine Emergencies Beyond Diabetes
- Gastrointestinal, Renal, and Genitourinary Emergencies
- Toxicology and Overdose Management
- Sepsis and Systemic Infection
- Allergic Reaction and Anaphylaxis
- Environmental Emergencies: Heat, Cold, and Submersion
EMS Operations
- AEMT Scope of Practice and Medical Direction
- Specialized Transport Considerations
- Scene Safety, Personal Protection, and Infection Control
- Multiple Casualty Incidents, Triage, and Incident Command
- Documentation, Communication, and Confidentiality
- Ambulance Operations and Equipment Readiness
- Responder Wellness and Resilience