9 free AEMT practice questions: Differential Diagnosis Basics
These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.
Work through all 9, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.
Question 1 of 9
An AEMT is assessing a 49-year-old patient with abdominal pain that has no obvious cause. Which approach describes correct use of a differential?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Hold several causes open and act on the most dangerous
Hold several causes open and act on the most dangerous one. A differential is a list, not one guess. The list holds the likely causes and the dangerous causes side by side. Causes move up and down the list as you find new things. You do not have to narrow the list to one cause before you treat. Treatment follows the most dangerous cause that is still possible, per protocol. For abdominal pain with no obvious cause, the dangerous causes stay on the list until the hospital can rule them out.
Why the others are wrong
Narrow the list to one cause before starting treatment: Narrowing to one cause before treatment is how classroom test questions train you to answer. Ruling out causes of abdominal pain takes imaging and lab work you do not have in the field. Waiting for that certainty leaves the time sensitive causes untreated.
Choose the most common cause and treat only that one: The most common cause usually is the right one. A differential exists so a rare, deadly cause does not get missed. Missing a deadly cause and over-treating a harmless one do not cost the same.
Report the most likely cause to the hospital as the finding: A single cause makes a radio report sound clean. Naming one cause turns your working list into a conclusion you cannot make in the field. The hospital can repeat your exam, but the hospital cannot rebuild the list you were holding or your reasons. Give the hospital your differential, not just the most likely cause.
Question 2 of 9
Bystanders report that a 34-year-old patient collapsed in a grocery store aisle and seemed confused afterward. The patient is now fully oriented and states that the confusion cleared within about 30 seconds. There is no tongue injury, no incontinence, and no weakness or speech change. Which cause does this recovery pattern support?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · A syncopal episode
This patient had a syncopal episode. Syncope and a seizure can both leave a patient on the floor and briefly confused. The recovery is what tells them apart. Once a syncopal patient is lying flat, blood flow to the brain comes back almost right away. That's why a syncopal patient is usually oriented within seconds to a minute. This patient's confusion cleared within about 30 seconds. There was no tongue injury and no incontinence. Those findings fit syncope. Syncope sends you looking for a cardiac cause rather than a neurologic one.
Why the others are wrong
A seizure with a postictal period: A seizure is more likely when the patient bit the side of the tongue, was incontinent, or was seen having rhythmic shaking. None of those are here. A patient coming out of a seizure is confused and sleepy and clears slowly, over 5 to 30 minutes. Clearing in 30 seconds is far too fast for a postictal period.
A stroke with resolving symptoms: a real event and a real reason to transport. A stroke causes focal findings. This patient had no weakness and no speech change at any point.
An episode of low blood glucose: Low blood glucose does cause collapse and confusion, and it stays on the list until you measure it. Low blood glucose does not correct itself within 30 seconds without treatment. The fast recovery argues against hypoglycemia.
Question 3 of 9
A 70-year-old patient with a long history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease woke at 2 in the morning unable to breathe and cannot lie flat. There has been no cough and no sputum for weeks. Fine crackles are heard at both bases and climb partway up both lung fields. The vital signs are BP 162/94, P 108, R 28, and SpO₂ 88% on room air. Which impression do these findings support, and for which reason?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Acute pulmonary edema, since crackles and an overnight onset both point there
This patient is in acute pulmonary edema. The question gives you fine crackles at both bases that climb partway up both lung fields. Fine crackles come from fluid sitting in the alveoli. The alveoli pop open with each breath, and that makes the crackling sound. The crackles start at the bases and climb higher as the edema gets worse. The onset fits pulmonary edema too. This patient woke at 2 in the morning unable to breathe and cannot lie flat. Pulmonary edema builds over hours, and it often wakes patients at night short of breath. A COPD exacerbation builds over days, usually after a cold, with more cough and more sputum. This patient has had no cough and no sputum for weeks.
Why the others are wrong
Acute pulmonary edema, since rhonchi mean fluid has reached the alveoli: Acute pulmonary edema is the right impression, but the reason given is backwards. Rhonchi come from secretions in the large airways. Fluid in the alveoli makes crackles, and crackles are what this patient has.
An exacerbation of the lung disease, since the patient has carried it for years: A long COPD history does make an exacerbation a fair guess in a patient this short of breath. The history tells you what the patient has had for years. Tonight the patient has crackles and an onset over hours, and both point to pulmonary edema.
An exacerbation of the lung disease, since crackles are its expected sound: A COPD exacerbation can put an older patient in severe distress, the same as pulmonary edema. The sound of an exacerbation is rhonchi, not crackles. Rhonchi are coarse and low pitched, and they often clear after a cough.
Question 4 of 9
A 54-year-old patient collapsed at a family cookout. A relative describes the body stiffening and then shaking rhythmically for more than a minute. The patient is on the ground, sleepy, and answering slowly. An AEMT is separating a faint from a seizure. Which feature settles it?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · How long the patient takes to become fully oriented again
The time it takes the patient to become fully oriented again separates a faint from a seizure. A faint and a seizure both leave a patient on the ground who is confused for a while. A patient who fainted is usually oriented within seconds to about a minute of lying flat. Lying flat lets blood get back to the brain, and the patient clears quickly. After a seizure the patient is postictal. A postictal patient is confused and sleepy and clears slowly, over 5 to 30 minutes. This patient is sleepy and answering slowly. The relative saw the body stiffen and then shake rhythmically for more than a minute. That points to a seizure. Tongue biting along the side and incontinence would point to a seizure too. The time to full recovery is still the feature that settles the call. Time how long this patient takes to clear.
Why the others are wrong
Whether the patient fell from a standing position: A fall from standing does fit a faint, and the position is worth documenting. A seizure can drop a standing patient too. Falling from standing does not point to either one by itself.
Whether the skin was pale at the moment of the collapse: Pale skin at the moment of collapse is a real sign of a faint. Here the pallor would come second hand from a relative, and pallor is a soft finding. Pale skin does not settle the question the way a timed recovery does.
Whether the patient was briefly confused after the collapse: Confusion right after the collapse is abnormal, and confusion is the finding everyone notices first. Patients are confused after a faint and after a seizure. How long the confusion lasts is what separates them.
Question 5 of 9
A 23-year-old patient is breathing fast and looks frightened after an argument. The breaths are deep as well as fast, the skin is flushed and dry, and the patient says nothing hurts. The vital signs are BP 118/74, P 122, R 34, and SpO₂ 100% on room air. An AEMT is separating anxious hyperventilation from the breathing of a metabolic acidosis. Which feature settles it?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Whether the breathing is deep as well as fast
Deep breathing separates a metabolic acidosis from anxious hyperventilation. Anxiety makes a patient breathe fast. A metabolic acidosis makes a patient breathe fast and deep. The deep breaths blow off carbon dioxide, and blowing off carbon dioxide brings the pH back up some. This patient's breaths are deep as well as fast, and the skin is flushed and dry. Those findings point to a metabolic acidosis, not anxiety. An anxious patient is usually young and has a trigger. Anxious patients often have tingling in the fingers and around the mouth, with normal skin and a normal glucose. A patient with an acidosis moves big volumes of air and looks sick in ways anxiety does not explain. Never have a fast breathing patient rebreathe into a bag. Never settle on anxiety when the skin, the glucose, or the capnography says otherwise. The deep, fast breathing is the compensation keeping an acidotic patient alive. Slowing the breathing down takes that compensation away.
Why the others are wrong
Whether the respiratory rate has passed 24 breaths in a minute: A rate of 34 is abnormal and needs attention. Anxiety and an acidosis both push the rate well past 24. A cutoff number cannot separate them.
Whether the patient can speak in full sentences between breaths: Speaking in full sentences is a quick check of how hard a patient is working to breathe. Both of these patients can usually still speak in full sentences. The ability to speak does not pick between them.
Whether an emotional trigger can be identified on scene: The argument makes anxiety look like the whole explanation. A trigger makes anxiety more likely, but a trigger does not settle the question. A patient can be upset and have an acidosis at the same time.
Question 6 of 9
A 65-year-old patient is gray, cool, and sweating, with a weak radial pulse and a complaint of chest pressure. The blood pressure was taken over a jacket sleeve in a moving ambulance and read BP 130/84. The other vital signs are P 124, R 24, and SpO₂ 94% on room air. What does an AEMT do with that blood pressure?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Repeat it on a bare arm before accepting the number
Repeat the blood pressure on a bare arm before you accept the number. The reading of 130/84 was taken over a jacket sleeve in a moving ambulance. A pressure taken that way is less accurate than one taken on a bare arm at rest. This patient is gray, cool, and sweating, with a weak radial pulse and a heart rate of 124. Those findings look like shock, and they do not match a pressure of 130/84. When a number disagrees with the patient, repeat the number before you believe it. If the repeat pressure matches how the patient looks, the patient was right. A cuff reading of 130 deserves the same doubt as a saturation of 82 from a cold finger in an alert, warm, comfortable patient.
Why the others are wrong
Treat for shock and take no further pressures before arrival: Treating the patient instead of the number is the right instinct, and treating for shock fits this patient. Taking no more pressures throws away the trend. In a patient with chest pressure, the trend tells you whether your treatment is working.
Accept it, since a measured value outranks an impression: A measured number usually does carry more weight than an impression. This number came from a poor technique, and the number disagrees with everything else about the patient. A number like that gets repeated before you accept it.
Document it and recheck at the routine fifteen minute interval: Rechecking every fifteen minutes is right for a stable patient. This patient is gray and sweating with a weak radial pulse, so the patient is not stable. A pressure that disagrees with the patient gets repeated now, not at the next routine check.
Question 7 of 9
A 57-year-old patient sat down at a warehouse and has not gotten back up. A relative insists this is nothing more than getting overheated and wants the crew to leave. An AEMT finds cool, pale, sweaty skin and a weak radial pulse. The vital signs are BP 88/60, P 128, and R 24. Which source of information carries the most weight here?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The physical findings, since the AEMT generated them personally
The physical findings carry the most weight. This patient is in decompensated shock. The skin is cool, pale, and sweaty, the radial pulse is weak, the blood pressure is 88/60, and the pulse is 128. In an adult, a systolic pressure below 90 means the blood pressure has fallen. A blood pressure that has fallen is what makes the shock decompensated. Information on a call comes from four places, and they are not equal. Dispatch gives you a first guess and nothing more. The scene gives you physical evidence. The history from the patient and the family tells you the most, and it is the least reliable source. Your own exam findings and your equipment readings get the most weight when they disagree with the other sources. Here the relative's story and your findings disagree, and your findings win. Stay, treat this patient for shock, and transport.
Why the others are wrong
The dispatch text, since it is the first information received: The dispatch text comes first, and it does shape what you expect to find. The dispatch text comes from a caller who may not have seen the patient. Dispatch information is a first guess, not evidence.
The patient, since the patient reports feeling only a little warm: What the patient says is always worth hearing, and it belongs in your report. The patient says only a little warm. The cool, pale, sweaty skin, the weak pulse, and the blood pressure of 88/60 say this patient is much sicker than a little warm. When the story and the findings disagree, the findings usually win.
The relative, since the relative knows the patient from day to day: Family often knows the patient's normal in a way you cannot learn anywhere else, and that history is useful. History from anyone is still the least reliable source on the call. Here the relative says overheating, and your findings say shock.
Question 8 of 9
A 13-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes is unresponsive on a bedroom floor with snoring respirations at a rate of 8. The blood glucose level is 38 mg/dL. The other vital signs are BP 104/64, P 118, and SpO₂ 89% on room air. What does an AEMT do first?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · Open the airway and support ventilation before anything else
Open the airway and support ventilation first. This patient is unresponsive with snoring respirations at a rate of 8 and an SpO₂ of 89% on room air. For an unresponsive patient with low blood sugar, the order is airway and ventilation, then vascular access, then dextrose. The breathing problem will kill this patient long before a blood glucose of 38 does. Fixing the airway takes seconds. Dextrose takes minutes to work. Doing these steps out of order is how a patient with low blood sugar goes into cardiac arrest with a perfect glucose reading. An airway obstruction kills in minutes, and inadequate ventilation kills in minutes too. Everything else kills more slowly.
Why the others are wrong
Establish intravenous access so dextrose can be given without delay: Vascular access does have to happen before dextrose, and it needs to happen on this call. Access comes after the airway and ventilation. A patient who is not moving air will not live long enough for the sugar to matter.
Give oral glucose between the cheek and the gum: Oral glucose is a real treatment for low blood sugar, and it is quick to grab. This patient is unresponsive with snoring respirations. Anything you put in this patient's mouth puts the airway at risk.
Recheck the glucose on a second site to confirm the reading: Rechecking a glucose that does not match the patient is a good habit, and glucometers do misread. A reading of 38 matches an unresponsive patient with type 1 diabetes. The breathing is the emergency no matter what a second reading says.
Question 9 of 9
A 36-year-old patient reports the sudden onset of the "worst headache of their life" that began abruptly about 20 minutes ago while at rest. The patient denies any head trauma, is alert and oriented, has pupils equal and reactive, has no facial droop or focal weakness, and is afebrile. Vitals are BP 148/92, P 88, R 16, and SpO₂ 99% on room air. Which statement best reflects how the AEMT should approach this patient's differential?
Show the answer and rationale
Correct answer · The sudden, severe onset raises concern for subarachnoid hemorrhage, which a normal exam does not rule out; transport as a high-priority possible neurologic emergency
This patient could have a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The patient calls this the "worst headache of their life" and says it started suddenly at rest. A headache that hits full strength right away is what a blood vessel bursting into the space around the brain feels like. Many of these patients look exactly like this one at first. The patient is alert and oriented, the pupils are equal and reactive, there is no facial droop or weakness, and there is no fever. The blood sits in the space around the brain instead of damaging one specific area. That's why a field exam often finds no droop or weakness until the patient bleeds again or develops hydrocephalus or vasospasm. A normal exam does not rule out a bleed. Only imaging at the hospital can do that. Transport this patient as a high-priority possible neurologic emergency.
Why the others are wrong
A normal neurologic exam and the absence of both fever and head trauma make a tension headache the most likely cause, so transport priority can remain routine: Tension headache is the most common headache you will see. A normal neuro exam with no fever fits a tension headache. A tension headache usually feels like a tight band around the head. The pain builds slowly over hours, and the patient has often had headaches like it before. This headache started suddenly at full strength while the patient was resting. A tension headache does not start that way. Treating a tension headache as a possible bleed only costs you a high-priority transport. Missing a bleed can cost the patient's life.
Because the vital signs and the neurologic exam are both unremarkable at this time, subarachnoid hemorrhage can reasonably be removed from active consideration: Normal vital signs and a normal neuro exam are what you expect early in a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Those findings describe how the patient is doing right now, not what is causing the headache. Using them to drop the bleed from your list is the same mistake option A makes.
The elevated blood pressure reading confirms a hypertensive emergency as the underlying cause and should be the finding that guides transport priority: A hypertensive emergency is a very high blood pressure with signs of organ damage. Those signs include altered mental status, pulmonary edema, chest pain from ischemia or a dissection, or a new neuro deficit. A pressure of 148/92 is only mildly high, too low to count as a hypertensive emergency even with those signs. Blood pressure often goes up as a response to a problem inside the head, not as the cause of it.
Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points
Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.
Take the free AEMT diagnosticMore free AEMT practice questions by topic
Airway, Respiration & Ventilation
Cardiology & Resuscitation
Trauma
Medical/Obstetrics/Gynecology
- IV Therapy and Fluid Administration
- Medication Administration Routes
- Diabetic Emergencies and Glucometry
- Respiratory Emergencies and Nebulized Medications
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies
- Neurologic Emergencies: Stroke, Seizure, and Altered Mental Status
- Endocrine Emergencies Beyond Diabetes
- Gastrointestinal, Renal, and Genitourinary Emergencies
- Toxicology and Overdose Management
- Sepsis and Systemic Infection
- Allergic Reaction and Anaphylaxis
- Environmental Emergencies: Heat, Cold, and Submersion
EMS Operations
- AEMT Scope of Practice and Medical Direction
- Specialized Transport Considerations
- Scene Safety, Personal Protection, and Infection Control
- Multiple Casualty Incidents, Triage, and Incident Command
- Documentation, Communication, and Confidentiality
- Ambulance Operations and Equipment Readiness
- Responder Wellness and Resilience