Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree AEMT practice questions · EMS Operations

10 free AEMT practice questions: Ambulance Operations and Equipment Readiness

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

An AEMT checking the airway bag finds that the reservoir bag is missing from the BVM, although the device is otherwise intact. Which function does the reservoir provide when the device is in use?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Delivery of an oxygen concentration approaching 100%

The reservoir is what lets a BVM deliver close to 100% oxygen. With oxygen running at 15 L/min, the reservoir fills with oxygen between squeezes. When the bag re-expands after a squeeze, the bag refills from that stored oxygen. Without the reservoir, the bag refills partly with room air. The oxygen in each breath then falls well short of 100%. The bag still moves the same volume, seals the same way, and can be squeezed at any rate. Patients who need a BVM are the patients who can least afford less oxygen. Put a reservoir on this BVM before it goes back in the airway bag.

Why the others are wrong

Delivery of a tidal volume large enough for an adult: Tidal volume is the amount of air in each breath. The bag still moves the same volume with each squeeze, with or without the reservoir.

Creation of an effective seal against the patient's face: The seal comes from how well the mask fits and how you hold the mask on the face. The reservoir bag plays no part in the seal.

Delivery of ventilations at the rate the patient needs: You control the rate by how often you squeeze the bag. This bag can still be squeezed at any rate. The missing reservoir only changes how much oxygen is in each of those breaths.

Question 2 of 10

An AEMT is replacing an empty portable oxygen cylinder at 2130 with a full cylinder taken from the station storage rack. The regulator will not seat because its pins do not line up with the holes in the cylinder valve. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Obtain a cylinder that matches the regulator

The pins not lining up is the Pin Index Safety System working. Each medical gas has its own pin pattern on the cylinder valve. The regulator has pins in matching spots. A regulator built for oxygen cannot seat on a cylinder holding a different gas or with a different valve. Nothing in the question says a pin is bent or a screw is stripped. The pins simply do not match. Set that cylinder aside and pull another one from the rack. The right cylinder seats with no force and no changes. The pins are the last check that the gas going to the patient is oxygen.

Why the others are wrong

Force the regulator down until the pins seat: A regulator that needs force to seat is on the wrong cylinder. The pin mismatch is the safety system warning you about a wrong gas or a wrong valve. Forcing the pins past that warning can send the wrong gas to the patient.

Remove the pin that blocks the connection: Removing the pin treats the pin as the problem. Nothing in the question describes a bent or broken pin, only pins that do not line up. Taking a pin out destroys the exact part meant to stop this cylinder from being used.

Turn the regulator over and tighten the screw: Flipping the regulator and tightening the screw is a fix for a loose or backward regulator. The question describes pins that do not line up with the holes, not a loose screw. Turning the regulator over does nothing about the real fault.

Question 3 of 10

After a call for a nosebleed, an AEMT is disposing of the disposable equipment used in the patient compartment. A gauze dressing is soaked with the patient's blood. The outer wrapper of that dressing was removed before the dressing was applied and is dry. An NRB was worn by the patient and is free of blood. An emesis basin was handed to the patient but was not used. Which item must be discarded in a biohazard container approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The gauze dressing soaked with blood

Waste from a call is sorted by what is on the item, not by whether the item was used in patient care. Anything bloody or soiled with body fluids goes into a biohazard container approved by OSHA. Items that are not contaminated go out following OSHA and local guidelines, and most of them are handled as general trash. The gauze dressing is soaked with the patient's blood. Blood on the gauze means the gauze goes in the biohazard container. The wrapper is dry and came off before the dressing was applied. The NRB is free of blood. The emesis basin was never used. None of those three has blood or body fluids on it.

Why the others are wrong

The NRB worn by the patient: An NRB would go in the biohazard container if blood or body fluids got on the mask. This NRB is free of blood. Being worn on the patient's face does not make the mask biohazard waste.

The outer wrapper from the dressing package: The wrapper came off before the dressing ever touched the patient, and the question says the wrapper is dry. The wrapper never contacted blood. Most disposable items from a call, like this wrapper, are handled as general trash.

The emesis basin handed to the patient: A basin with body fluids in it would go in the biohazard container. This basin was handed to the patient but never used. Nothing went into the basin, so the basin is not contaminated.

Question 4 of 10

An AEMT is placing a full spare oxygen cylinder into service on the ambulance. The plastic seal has been removed from the valve stem, the opening has been inspected and is free of debris, and the sealing washer is in place on the regulator collar. Which action comes next?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Open the valve briefly and close it before attaching the regulator

The plastic seal is off and the opening is clear, so the next step is cracking the cylinder. Cracking means opening the valve slowly and then closing the valve again. The short burst of oxygen helps keep dirt and other contaminants out of the oxygen flow. Never point the cylinder at yourself or anyone else while you crack it. Only after cracking the cylinder do you put the regulator on. Line up the oxygen port and the pins with the holes, and hand tighten the regulator. Then open the cylinder fully to check for leaks and read the pressure. The order matters because cracking is a clearing step. If the regulator is already on, any debris in the opening gets blown into the regulator instead of out of the valve.

Why the others are wrong

Attach the regulator, then open the valve briefly and close it: Opening the valve with the regulator attached is how you check for leaks. The brief opening is a different step. The brief opening clears the valve opening before anything is attached. Done after the regulator is on, the brief opening pushes whatever was in the opening into the regulator.

Attach the regulator and open the valve fully to read the gauge: Reading the gauge does happen, just later. You open the valve fully and read the gauge once the regulator is firmly attached. Clearing the opening still has to come first, and reading the gauge does not replace that step.

Attach the regulator and open the flowmeter to clear the opening: Opening the flowmeter does run gas through the whole setup. Gas leaving the flowmeter has already passed through the regulator. Any debris in the valve opening gets carried into the equipment instead of out of the valve.

Question 5 of 10

Which radio communication practice is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Keep transmissions brief and clear, and wait for the other party to finish before responding

Radio traffic works when each message is brief, clear, and sent one at a time. A radio channel only carries one transmission at a time. If two units key up together, neither message gets through. Brief and clear covers what you say. Waiting for the other party to finish covers when you say it. Each of the other options makes the message longer, makes it harder to understand, or talks over another unit.

Why the others are wrong

Use codes specific to the local department so transmissions stay short: Department codes do get used for routine traffic inside one agency, and they do keep transmissions short. The codes stop working once traffic crosses agencies. A mutual aid unit, a receiving hospital, or a dispatcher from another system cannot decode them. That's why plain language is the standard.

Begin transmitting as soon as a thought comes to mind, even if another unit is already talking: Talking as soon as you think of something is fine face to face. On a radio, keying up over another unit blocks both messages. Neither one gets through, and both have to be sent again.

Include personal opinions about the call to give dispatch full context: Your impressions of the call have a place in your written narrative and in the verbal handoff to the receiving nurse. On the radio, opinions make the message longer and tie up the channel. Everyone monitoring the channel hears them too. Radio traffic should carry objective information that someone can act on.

Question 6 of 10

Which entry is an example of objective documentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Patient reports drinking alcohol; speech slurred, gait unsteady

Objective documentation is anything a second crew could have seen and written down the same way. That means measurements, exam findings, behavior described as behavior, and the patient's own words in quotes. Subjective documentation is your conclusion about those findings. This entry stays objective. It gives what the patient said he did, plus two findings anyone could see: slurred speech and an unsteady gait. The entry never uses the word "drunk," and it does not need to. Any reader can reach that conclusion from the findings. This matters in a legal record, because a label can be attacked in court and an observation cannot.

Why the others are wrong

Patient was obviously drunk and belligerent throughout the assessment: "Drunk and belligerent" is a conclusion, even if you are probably right. Calling a patient intoxicated takes a blood alcohol level you do not have. A head injury, hypoglycemia, a stroke, and hypoxia can all cause the same slurred, unsteady, combative patient. "Belligerent" is your read of how the patient acted. Nobody can check either word later.

Patient was a mess and refused to cooperate with the crew: "A mess" and "refused to cooperate" are judgments about the patient, not a description of what happened. "A mess" tells the reader nothing. An objective entry would say what the patient actually did, like pulling away from the blood pressure cuff or refusing to answer questions. In the emergency department or in court, the specific behavior is evidence and the summary is worth nothing.

Patient seemed fine overall and had no real complaints: "Seemed fine overall" is vague instead of biased. "Seemed" is an impression, and "fine" is not a finding. The entry gives nothing anyone can measure. If this patient gets worse an hour after arrival, nobody can tell what he looked like while you had him. There is no baseline in the chart for a later provider to compare against.

Question 7 of 10

A patient in labor is being transported on the stretcher. Which position is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Left lateral, or supine tilted slightly to the left

A patient in labor rides on her left side, or on her back tilted slightly to the left. Near term, the uterus is heavy. When she lies flat on her back, the uterus presses on the inferior vena cava. The inferior vena cava runs on the right side of the spine. The pressure on the vein cuts the blood flowing back to the heart. Less blood comes back, so the heart pumps out less, and her blood pressure can drop. This is called supine hypotensive syndrome. Rolling her to the left, or tilting the stretcher fifteen to thirty degrees left, takes the weight off the vein. Use this position for any patient in labor, not only one who already has symptoms.

Why the others are wrong

Supine with the stretcher flat and the legs elevated: Raising the legs helps blood return from the legs. This patient's problem is the uterus pressing on the inferior vena cava. Raising her legs does not take the uterus off the vein. Lying flat on her back is the position that causes the problem.

Prone with the head of the stretcher elevated: Prone means lying face down. Face down puts her weight onto the uterus and her abdomen. Prone also keeps you from watching the perineum or delivering the baby if it comes during transport. Raising the head of the stretcher does not fix either problem.

Right lateral to improve venous return from the legs: Right lateral gets her off her back, but it is the wrong side. The inferior vena cava runs on the right side of the spine, so left is the side that moves the uterus off the vein. For a pregnant patient, the side is left, not right.

Question 8 of 10

The AEMT is treating a patient at a scene that also involves a police investigation. Which action is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Move any object blocking access to the patient and note what was moved

When patient care and evidence collide, patient care comes first. A living patient is the priority. No protocol asks you to leave a patient out of reach to protect a scene. What you owe the investigation is a record. Move only what you have to, and write down what you moved and where it was. Investigators use that record to rebuild the scene the way it was before you got there.

Why the others are wrong

Pick up and secure any weapon found near the patient: Scene safety does come first, and a weapon near the patient looks like a safety problem. Picking up the weapon ruins fingerprints and trace evidence and puts your DNA on the weapon. Handling the weapon also creates a chain of custody problem that can hurt a prosecution. An AEMT holding a firearm when more officers arrive is a hazard too. Leave the weapon in place, keep everyone away from it, and tell law enforcement exactly where it is.

Theorize with police about what likely happened at the scene: Investigators do want your input, as long as it is what you saw and not what you guess. Where the patient was found, what the patient said, and what you moved are facts police can use. A guess about what happened can point an investigation at the wrong theory. You may also have to defend that guess under oath in a deposition. Give police your findings, not your conclusions, the same as in your documentation.

Avoid documenting anything that was moved, to keep the report short: A short report is not the goal, and leaving out what you moved removes the one thing that makes moving items acceptable. Say you move a chair, kick a shell casing, or pull the patient into the hallway. If none of that is written down, investigators study a changed scene without knowing it was changed. Without that record, moving items contaminates the scene.

Question 9 of 10

The AEMT is transporting a patient with a suspected sexual assault. Which action is correct?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Avoid washing the patient and preserve clothing as evidence when possible

Patient care comes first, and preserving evidence happens alongside it. Most of evidence preservation is things you do not do. Do not let the patient wash. Avoid cutting through tears or holes in the clothing when you can. If clothing has to come off, bag it and hand it over instead of throwing it away. Discourage eating, drinking, and using the bathroom if those can reasonably wait, for the same reason. Document objectively: the patient's own words and what you actually saw, with no conclusions about what happened. All of it comes second to a calm, private approach that lets the patient lead. A patient who is not treated with care may refuse the exam altogether.

Why the others are wrong

Have the patient shower before transport for comfort: A shower is an ordinary comfort measure on almost any other call. On this call the patient will often ask for one, because washing is one of the first things an assault patient wants. Washing destroys biological evidence that cannot be recovered later. The patient may want that evidence to exist once the first distress passes. Gently discourage the shower. Keeping the evidence leaves the patient the choice later. A shower takes that choice away for good.

Discard the patient's clothing to reduce distress: Throwing out ruined clothing is routine on other calls, like a trauma patient's cut away shirt. Clothing from a suspected assault is possible evidence, and the patient may need it for the case. Clothing that has to come off can be bagged and handed over. Handle the distress with privacy and a blanket, not by throwing away evidence.

Delay transport until police complete their investigation on scene: Holding for law enforcement is right when the scene is not safe yet or police need you staged. Nothing in this question describes an unsafe scene. Waiting here delays transport only for the investigation's convenience. Evidence preservation is a list of things you do not do, so it works fine during transport and does not cost the patient any time.

Question 10 of 10

A patient later files a negligence claim against an AEMT. Which element must the patient prove, in addition to duty and breach, for the claim to succeed?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · That the breach caused measurable harm to the patient

Negligence has four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. The question already gives you duty and breach. What is left is causation and damages together. The patient has to show that the AEMT's substandard care actually caused measurable harm. That harm can be a physical injury, a worse condition, or a financial loss. Without proof that the breach caused real harm, there is nothing to compensate the patient for. The claim fails even if the AEMT clearly broke the standard of care.

Why the others are wrong

That the AEMT specifically intended to harm the patient: Intent to harm belongs to intentional tort claims, like assault or battery. Negligence is about carelessness, meaning the AEMT failed to act the way a reasonably careful AEMT would. The patient does not have to prove the AEMT meant to cause harm.

That the AEMT had a prior history of disciplinary action: A disciplinary record might come up during discovery or affect the AEMT's credibility. A past record is still not one of the four elements the patient has to prove.

That a supervisor was physically present during the call: Whether a supervisor was on scene is a question of oversight and staffing policy. A supervisor being there or not does not prove causation or damages.

Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free AEMT diagnostic

More free AEMT practice questions by topic