Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree AEMT practice questions · Trauma

10 free AEMT practice questions: Advanced Trauma Interventions

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT AEMT content specifications and kept inside the AEMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 10, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free AEMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 10

An AEMT has held firm direct pressure on a deep forearm laceration for five minutes without lifting it. Blood is now soaking through the gauze. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Add gauze on top of the soaked dressing and press harder

Direct pressure works by letting a clot form against the bleeding point, and anything that disturbs that clot restarts the bleeding. Blood soaking through the first dressing is managed by adding dressings on top and increasing pressure, never by taking the original off. Hold it squarely over the bleeding point with a gloved hand or gauze for at least five minutes without lifting the dressing to look, because lifting strips whatever clot has formed. Two steps you may have learned earlier are gone from this sequence: elevation and pressure points are no longer taught. If pressure is not controlling an extremity bleed, the next move is a tourniquet, and if the site is one a tourniquet cannot reach, the parallel move is wound packing. Soaking through the first dressing is not the same as pressure failing. Pressure has failed when the added dressings and the harder pressure also fail to hold it, and that is where the tourniquet goes on.

Why the others are wrong

Remove the soaked gauze and replace it with a dry dressing: Replacing a soaked dressing looks like good technique and keeps the wound tidy, which is why crews do it. Pulling the gauze off takes the forming clot with it, so the bleeding you were controlling starts over from the beginning.

Lift the dressing to find the exact bleeding point, then reapply: Finding the exact source seems like it would let you aim the pressure better, and precision is usually a virtue. Lifting to look is the specific action that strips the clot, and you can increase pressure over the same spot without ever seeing the vessel.

Elevate the arm above the heart while holding pressure: Elevation was taught for years and still feels intuitive, so it remains one of the most common answers here. It is no longer part of the hemorrhage control sequence, and reaching for it wastes time that belongs to added pressure or a tourniquet.

Question 2 of 10

An AEMT applied a tourniquet about three inches above a mangled lower leg wound. The bright bleeding has slowed considerably but has not stopped, and a pulse is still palpable at the ankle. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Tighten it until the bleeding and the distal pulse both stop

A tourniquet is tightened until two things are true at the same time: the bleeding stops and the distal pulse is gone. Both, not either. A device tight enough to stop venous return but not arterial inflow makes bleeding worse, because blood keeps arriving through the arteries and has nowhere to leave, so a tourniquet that is still oozing is under-tightened rather than failing. The palpable ankle pulse in this patient is the clearest evidence that arterial flow is still getting through. Tighten until it is gone. Place the device two to three inches above the wound, on skin where possible and never over a joint, and write the time on the tourniquet, on tape, or on the skin.

Why the others are wrong

Loosen it slightly and add direct pressure over the wound: Loosening feels compassionate when a patient is in pain, and adding pressure sounds like you are combining two methods. Partial occlusion is the mechanism that worsens bleeding, and pain under a tourniquet is treated with analgesia, which is within your scope, rather than by loosening the device.

Leave it exactly as applied and cover it so that it is not disturbed: Bleeding that has slowed considerably looks like success, and disturbing a working tourniquet feels risky. Slowed is not stopped, and covering a tourniquet is its own error because the receiving team needs to see the device and the time written on it.

Move it closer to the wound and retighten it there: Moving closer to the wound seems like it would concentrate the pressure where the injury is. The correct placement is already two to three inches proximal, and repositioning costs time on a patient who is still bleeding while doing nothing about the real problem, which is that the device is not tight enough.

Question 3 of 10

An AEMT finds a penetrating wound to the anterior chest that bubbles with each breath. The unit does not carry a commercial vented chest seal. Which dressing is the appropriate alternative?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · An occlusive dressing taped on three sides

An open pneumothorax, the sucking chest wound, is a hole in the chest wall that gives air a second path into the pleural space, so the lung on that side partly collapses. The dressing you want is one that lets air out on exhalation but not in on inhalation. A commercial vented seal does that with a one-way valve. Without one, an occlusive dressing taped on three sides does the same job: the untaped edge lifts when pressure rises inside and lays flat when the patient inhales. Pair it with high-concentration oxygen and ventilatory support if the effort is failing, and keep watching, because a seal that traps air can produce a tension pneumothorax under your own dressing.

Why the others are wrong

A dry sterile dressing secured with a pressure bandage: A dry dressing with pressure is the standard answer for most wounds you will treat, and the habit carries over. Gauze is porous, so air keeps moving through the chest wall defect in both directions and the lung on that side stays partly collapsed.

An occlusive dressing taped on all four sides: A four-sided seal is airtight and looks like the most thorough version of the treatment, which is why it is chosen so often. It gives trapped air no escape, and if the lung underneath is leaking, the pressure builds until venous return falls.

A petroleum gauze pad laid over the wound and left uncovered: Petroleum gauze is occlusive and is genuinely used on chest wounds, so half the reasoning is right. Left uncovered it does not stay sealed against the chest wall through movement and breathing, and it needs a backing taped in place to work as a seal at all.

Question 4 of 10

A 7-year-old patient fell off a scooter and will not use the right arm. The wrist looks normal with no swelling and no deformity, and the child has point tenderness just above the joint. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Splint the arm and treat the injury as a fracture

Children have growth plates, and adults do not. That cartilage is weaker than the bone around it, so a force that would sprain an adult ligament fractures a child through the growth plate instead, often with nothing to see from the outside. A child with point tenderness near a joint is treated as fractured even when the limb looks normal. Splint it. Check circulation, sensation, and motor function distal to the injury before the splint goes on and again after it is secured, and document both sets. The cost of splinting an injury that turns out to be a sprain is a few minutes. The cost of missing a growth plate fracture can be a limb that grows crooked.

Why the others are wrong

Apply a cold pack and reassess before deciding to splint: Cold and reassessment are reasonable for a soft tissue injury, and the normal-looking wrist invites that read. Waiting for swelling to declare itself is the trap, because growth plate fractures frequently do not swell, and a child who will not use the arm has already told you something is broken.

Have the child move the wrist to judge whether it is broken: Asking a patient to move the joint is a common way providers try to sort a sprain from a fracture, and it feels efficient. Moving an injured growth plate can displace it, and range of motion does not reliably separate the two in a child.

Use a sling alone, since there is no deformity to immobilize: A sling supports the arm and is comfortable, which makes it feel like enough for an injury with no deformity. A sling alone does not immobilize the joint above and the bone below, so the injury keeps moving inside it every time the child shifts.

Question 5 of 10

A 33-year-old patient's hand was severed in a machine. Bleeding at the stump is controlled and the amputated hand has been recovered, wrapped in lightly moistened sterile gauze, and sealed in a bag. How should the bag be handled during transport?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Kept cool beside ice, without the part touching the ice

An amputated part travels with the patient. Wrap it in sterile gauze, moisten it lightly, seal it in a bag, and keep it cool near ice rather than in direct contact with it. Cooling slows the tissue's metabolism and buys the surgical team time. Direct contact with ice freezes the tissue and destroys the cells the reattachment depends on, which is why the barrier between the part and the ice matters as much as the cooling itself. The same logic explains the light moistening and the seal: dry tissue desiccates, soaked tissue macerates, and the bag keeps meltwater out. Take the part even when reattachment looks unlikely, because that decision belongs to the surgeon and not to the field.

Why the others are wrong

Packed directly in ice so the part stays as cold as possible: Colder sounds better when the goal is preserving tissue, and packing something in ice is how you would handle anything perishable. Ice in direct contact freezes and kills the tissue, so this is the version of the right idea that ruins the part.

Kept at room temperature in the warm patient compartment: Keeping the part with the warm patient is convenient and avoids any risk of freezing it. Tissue at body temperature keeps consuming oxygen it is no longer receiving, so warm storage burns through the window for reattachment quickly.

Submerged in cold sterile saline for the whole transport: Cold saline seems to combine cooling with the moisture the tissue needs, and moisture genuinely is part of the care. Soaking waterlogs the tissue rather than lightly moistening it, and the correct handling is gauze that is damp, not a part sitting in fluid.

Question 6 of 10

A 26-year-old patient was standing about 15 feet from an explosion in a warehouse. The patient walked out on their own, has no visible injuries, and says they feel fine. The respiratory rate, pulse, and oxygen saturation are all normal and the lungs are clear. What is the appropriate disposition?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Transport for evaluation and observation even though the patient now feels well

Primary blast injury comes from the pressure wave itself acting on gas-filled organs, so the lungs, the middle ear, and the bowel take the damage while the skin looks untouched. Blast lung is the most common fatal primary blast injury among people who survive the explosion, and it presents with difficulty breathing, hypoxia, chest pain, and coughing blood. The part that matters for your decision is the timing: onset can be delayed by hours. A patient who looks well at the scene of a significant blast still warrants transport and observation, because the findings you would be waiting for have not had time to appear. Normal vital signs at ten minutes tell you nothing about hour three. Scene safety at a blast also includes the possibility of a secondary device timed for responders.

Why the others are wrong

Release the patient on scene after documenting a normal set of vital signs: Every finding you can measure is normal, and a patient who walked out and feels fine has a strong case for staying put. The mechanism is the finding here, and blast lung declares itself hours later in a patient whose first set of vitals looked exactly like this one.

Transport only if the patient develops difficulty breathing on scene: Using symptoms as the trigger is how you would triage most complaints, and it respects the patient's own report. Waiting for difficulty breathing puts the patient somewhere other than a hospital when it finally appears, which is the specific outcome the delayed-onset teaching exists to prevent.

Observe the patient on scene for about 20 minutes, then release if unchanged: A period of observation sounds like a reasonable compromise between transporting everyone and releasing everyone. Twenty minutes is nowhere near the window over which blast lung develops, so an unchanged patient at the end of it has not been cleared of anything.

Question 7 of 10

A 4-year-old patient in decompensated shock after a fall needs vascular access, and two peripheral attempts have failed. The AEMT is landmarking the left proximal tibia when a partner points out an obvious deformity of that same tibia just above the ankle. What should the AEMT do?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Insert the device in the opposite tibia

A fracture anywhere in the target bone rules that bone out for intraosseous access, because fluid pushed into a broken bone leaks out through the fracture instead of reaching the circulation. Go to a different site, and the opposite limb is usually the simplest answer. The contraindications hold across every site and are worth memorizing as one list: a fracture in the target bone, an attempt in that same bone within the past twenty-four to forty-eight hours, prosthetic joints or orthopedic hardware at the site, infection or burn over the insertion point, landmarks you cannot find, and known bone disease such as osteogenesis imperfecta. Any of those sends you somewhere else rather than justifying a cautious attempt at the compromised bone. Intraosseous access is within your scope for adults and children alike, and the usual trigger is two failed peripheral attempts or ninety seconds of trying.

Why the others are wrong

Insert the device in the same tibia below the deformity: Staying distal to the break sounds like it would keep the infusion away from the injury, and it preserves the landmark you already found. The fracture is still between the needle and the heart, so fluid entering below it has to cross the break to reach the circulation and will extravasate along the way.

Make a third and a fourth peripheral attempt instead: More peripheral attempts feel safer than a device you use less often, and some providers are reluctant to commit to the intraosseous route in a small child. Two failed attempts in a decompensated child is already the point at which you stop, and a third and fourth attempt spend minutes this patient does not have.

Proceed at the planned site, since the marrow cavity is intact: The marrow cavity at the proximal tibia genuinely may be intact when the break is near the ankle, so the reasoning is not empty. The contraindication is written for the bone rather than for the segment, because a fractured bone leaks, and a device placed under that reasoning delivers fluid into the leg instead of the patient.

Question 8 of 10

An AEMT has seated an intraosseous device in the proximal tibia of an adult trauma patient. Which step is mandatory before fluid will infuse at a useful rate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · A flush of 5 to 10 mL of saline

Marrow is not an open tube. It is a network of sinusoids packed with fat and cells, and those channels have to be opened before fluid will move through them. That is what the flush does, and it is mandatory: five to ten milliliters in an adult, two to five in a child. Skip it and the line will barely drip no matter how well the device is seated. Two other things are worth knowing about the flush. It hurts considerably in a conscious patient, and whether an AEMT may give intraosseous lidocaine beforehand is genuinely protocol-dependent. Intraosseous lines also flow poorly by gravity even after a good flush, so a pressure infuser bag or syringe pushes are usually needed to reach resuscitation rates. Palpate the calf during and after the infusion, since extravasation is the most common serious complication.

Why the others are wrong

Aspiration of marrow to confirm placement: Aspirating marrow is a satisfying confirmation that the device is in the right space, and it is taught as one way to check placement. Its absence does not prove failure, so it is a helpful finding rather than a required step, and a device that stands upright and flushes cleanly is placed correctly whether or not marrow comes back.

Injection of lidocaine to reduce the pain of infusion: Lidocaine before the flush addresses real pain in a conscious patient, and skipping it can feel cruel. Whether an AEMT may give it is set by local protocol rather than by a national rule, so it is not the step that is mandatory everywhere, and it is never what makes the line flow.

A check of the distal pulse in that limb: Checking distal circulation is good practice after placing anything in a limb, and it carries over from splinting. An intraosseous device sits inside the bone and does not compress the vessels running past it, so the distal pulse is not the check that determines whether the line will run.

Question 9 of 10

A 15-year-old patient is struck in the center of the chest by a pitched ball during a game and immediately collapses, unresponsive and pulseless. Bystander CPR is in progress when the AEMT arrives with an automated external defibrillator. What is the most appropriate next action?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Apply the AED, analyze the rhythm, and defibrillate if advised, continuing CPR between analyses

This presentation is commotio cordis: a blow to the chest landing at a vulnerable moment in the cardiac cycle precipitates ventricular fibrillation in an otherwise healthy young patient. The treatment is immediate, high-quality CPR paired with AED defibrillation, which is fully within AEMT scope, so there is nothing here that needs to wait for a paramedic. Applying the AED promptly and continuing CPR between rhythm analyses gives this patient the best chance of survival.

Why the others are wrong

Withhold defibrillation and transport immediately, because this mechanism requires a paramedic to defibrillate: AED defibrillation is a basic-level skill available to the AEMT, not a paramedic-only intervention, so withholding it and simply transporting would delay the one action most likely to restore a perfusing rhythm.

Perform a pericardiocentesis to relieve suspected cardiac tamponade before defibrillating: Pericardiocentesis is not a field skill performed at this level, and the mechanism and sudden pulseless collapse point to commotio cordis causing ventricular fibrillation, not cardiac tamponade.

Delay CPR until IV access is obtained so epinephrine can be given first: High-quality CPR and defibrillation must not be delayed to obtain IV access or give medication; compressions and shocks take priority over establishing a line in this arrest.

Question 10 of 10

A 29-year-old patient has a deep laceration high in the left groin from a chainsaw. Bright red blood is pulsing from the wound despite a trauma dressing and firm direct pressure. The wound is too proximal for a tourniquet to be applied above it. The vital signs are BP 96/64, P 130, and R 24. What should the AEMT do next?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Pack the wound with hemostatic gauze and hold firm direct pressure

Hemorrhage control escalates in a fixed order, and what moves you along it is what the wound allows. Direct pressure comes first, a tourniquet next for an extremity, but this wound is junctional, high in the groin, and the question states there is no room above it for a tourniquet. Junctional wounds sit at the groin, axilla, or neck, where there is no limb above the bleeding to compress, so that step is simply unavailable and packing replaces it. Gauze pressed firmly down into the wound tract carries pressure onto the bleeding vessel itself rather than onto the skin above it, and hemostatic gauze adds a clotting agent right at that surface. Hold continuous manual pressure for several minutes, secure the packing, and transport to a trauma center, because a junctional arterial bleed needs surgical control.

Why the others are wrong

Apply additional dressings over the trauma dressing and transport: Adding dressings on top is the right move for venous or capillary bleeding that has already slowed and only needs reinforcement while pressure continues. This blood is bright red and pulsing through a trauma dressing under firm pressure, which is arterial and not slowing. Every layer added moves the pressure further from the vessel, so the stack soaks up blood while the bleeding continues underneath, the opposite of what packing does.

Elevate the extremity and apply pressure at a proximal pressure point: Elevation and proximal pressure points are the classic legacy answer, taught for years and still the first thing many students reach for. Both were removed from current bleeding-control teaching because neither reliably stops arterial hemorrhage, and both consume time that belongs to the technique that works. Elevation is also meaningless for a groin wound, since there is nothing distal to raise, which leaves the key as the only real escalation.

Apply a tourniquet as high on the thigh as it will fit: A tourniquet is the correct next step for an arterial extremity bleed when there is limb above the wound to compress, and reaching for one is the right instinct. The question closes it: the wound is too proximal for a device to fit above it. A tourniquet placed at or below the level of the injury cannot occlude the artery feeding it and may raise venous pressure enough to increase the bleeding, so the key uses the technique designed for junctional wounds instead.

Find out which AEMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every AEMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free AEMT diagnostic

More free AEMT practice questions by topic